Literature DB >> 23948629

Neural response to emotional stimuli associated with successful antidepressant treatment and behavioral activation.

Sakina J Rizvi1, Tim V Salomons, Jakub Z Konarski, Jonathan Downar, Peter Giacobbe, Roger S McIntyre, Sidney H Kennedy.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) is a leading cause of disability globally. Currently available treatments have limited efficacy and combination strategies are frequently used. Several lines of research have demonstrated that MDD patients experience impairments in various components of affective processing, including regulation of affective states. AIM: To identify baseline and 1-week neuroimaging predictors of response to a 6-week trial of fluoxetine/olanzapine combination treatment during an affective processing task.
METHODS: Twenty-one MDD patients and 18 healthy controls were enrolled in the study. MDD patients were treated for 6 weeks with fluoxetine (40-60 mg/day) and olanzapine (5-12.5mg/day). All participants viewed images from the International Affective Picture Rating System during a functional magnetic resonance (fMRI) scan at baseline and 1 week.
RESULTS: There was a 57% response rate (defined as a 50% decrease in Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression-17 item) at 6 weeks. At baseline, responders had increased premotor activity while viewing negative images compared to non-responders and healthy controls. Higher baseline premotor activity was also predictive of greater percent change on the HAMD-17 and improvement in negative disposition and behavioral drive. Non-responders exhibited increased insular activity at baseline compared to responders. Higher activity in the posterior cingulate cortex was also predictive of greater percent change on the HAMD-17. Change from baseline to 1 week did not produce any significant predictive findings.
CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with fluoxetine/olanzapine demonstrated similar biomarkers of response to monotherapeutic strategies. In particular, posterior cingulate cortex, anterior insula, and premotor cortex may show predictive differences in their response to affective images prior to treatment. Further research needs to be conducted to determine the utility of early changes in emotion circuitry in predicting antidepressant response.
© 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antidepressant combination; Biomarker; Emotional processing; Major depressive disorder; Response; fMRI

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23948629     DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2013.06.050

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Affect Disord        ISSN: 0165-0327            Impact factor:   4.839


  19 in total

Review 1.  Abnormal neural activities in adults and youths with major depressive disorder during emotional processing: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xuqian Li; Junjing Wang
Journal:  Brain Imaging Behav       Date:  2021-04       Impact factor: 3.978

2.  Regulation of emotional response in juvenile monkeys treated with fluoxetine: MAOA interactions.

Authors:  M S Golub; C E Hogrefe; A M Bulleri
Journal:  Eur Neuropsychopharmacol       Date:  2016-11-13       Impact factor: 4.600

Review 3.  Progress in Elucidating Biomarkers of Antidepressant Pharmacological Treatment Response: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Last 15 Years.

Authors:  G Voegeli; M L Cléry-Melin; N Ramoz; P Gorwood
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 9.546

4.  The Canadian Biomarker Integration Network in Depression (CAN-BIND): magnetic resonance imaging protocols

Authors:  Glenda M. MacQueen; Stefanie Hassel; Stephen R. Arnott; Addington Jean; Christopher R. Bowie; Signe L. Bray; Andrew D. Davis; Jonathan Downar; Jane A. Foster; Benicio N. Frey; Benjamin I. Goldstein; Geoffrey B. Hall; Kate L. Harkness; Jacqueline Harris; Raymond W. Lam; Catherine Lebel; Roumen Milev; Daniel J. Müller; Sagar V. Parikh; Sakina Rizvi; Susan Rotzinger; Gulshan B. Sharma; Claudio N. Soares; Gustavo Turecki; Fidel Vila-Rodriguez; Joanna Yu; Mojdeh Zamyadi; Stephen C. Strother; Sidney H. Kennedy
Journal:  J Psychiatry Neurosci       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 6.186

5.  Neural Correlates of Antidepressant Treatment Response in Adolescents with Major Depressive Disorder.

Authors:  Kathryn R Cullen; Bonnie Klimes-Dougan; Dung Pham Vu; Melinda Westlund Schreiner; Bryon A Mueller; Lynn E Eberly; Jazmin Camchong; Ana Westervelt; Kelvin O Lim
Journal:  J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 2.576

Review 6.  The neuroscience of depression: implications for assessment and intervention.

Authors:  Manpreet K Singh; Ian H Gotlib
Journal:  Behav Res Ther       Date:  2014-09-04

7.  Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Chronically Impairs Sleep- and Wake-Dependent Emotional Processing.

Authors:  Janna Mantua; Owen S Henry; Nolan F Garskovas; Rebecca M C Spencer
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 5.849

8.  Salience Network Functional Connectivity Predicts Placebo Effects in Major Depression.

Authors:  Magdalena Sikora; Joseph Heffernan; Erich T Avery; Brian J Mickey; Jon-Kar Zubieta; Marta Peciña
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging       Date:  2016-01

9.  Impact of Fluoxetine on Behavioral Invigoration of Appetitive and Aversively Motivated Responses: Interaction With Dopamine Depletion.

Authors:  Carla Carratalá-Ros; Laura López-Cruz; Andrea Martínez-Verdú; Régulo Olivares-García; John D Salamone; Mercè Correa
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2021-07-09       Impact factor: 3.558

10.  Pathways to Neuroprediction: Opportunities and challenges to prediction of treatment response in depression.

Authors:  Scott A Langenecker; Natania A Crane; Lisanne M Jenkins; K Luan Phan; Heide Klumpp
Journal:  Curr Behav Neurosci Rep       Date:  2018-01-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.