Literature DB >> 23948332

Changes in timing of muscle contractions and running economy with altered stride pattern during running.

Mark J Connick1, Francois-Xavier Li.   

Abstract

Large alterations to the preferred running stride decrease running economy, and shorter strides increase leg muscle activity. However, the effect of altered strides on the timing of leg muscle activation is not known. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of moderate alterations to the running stride on running economy and the timing of biceps femoris (BF), vastus lateralis (VL) and gastrocnemius (GAST) muscle contractions. The preferred stride pattern for eleven trained male runners was measured prior to a separate visit where participants ran for bouts of 5 min whilst synchronising foot contacts to a metronome signal which was tuned to (1) the preferred stride, and (2) frequencies which related to ± 8% and ± 4% of the preferred stride length. Running economy was measured at each stride pattern along with electromyography and three-dimensional kinematics to estimate onset and offset of muscle contractions for each muscle. Running economy was greatest at the preferred stride length. However, a quadratic fit to the data was optimised at a stride which was 2.9% shorter than preferred. Onset and offset of BF and VL muscle contractions occurred earlier with shorter than preferred strides. We detected no changes to the timing of muscle contractions with longer than preferred strides and no changes to GAST muscle contractions. The results suggest that runners optimise running economy with a stride length that is close to, but shorter than, the preferred stride, and that timing of BF and VL muscle contractions change with shorter than preferred strides.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EMG; Eccentric contraction; Electromechanical delay; Stride frequency; Stride length

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23948332     DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2013.07.112

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gait Posture        ISSN: 0966-6362            Impact factor:   2.840


  8 in total

1.  Movement consistency during repetitive tool use action.

Authors:  Sandra Dorothee Starke; Chris Baber
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Small Step Frequency Changes Due to Footwear Condition Have No Effect on Running Economy.

Authors:  Joe Warne; Kieran Andrew Moran; Giles D Warrington
Journal:  Sports Med Int Open       Date:  2018-05-16

3.  Humans Optimize Ground Contact Time and Leg Stiffness to Minimize the Metabolic Cost of Running.

Authors:  Isabel S Moore; Kelly J Ashford; Charlotte Cross; Jack Hope; Holly S R Jones; Molly McCarthy-Ryan
Journal:  Front Sports Act Living       Date:  2019-11-04

Review 4.  Resistance Exercise for Improving Running Economy and Running Biomechanics and Decreasing Running-Related Injury Risk: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Anja Šuc; Pija Šarko; Jernej Pleša; Žiga Kozinc
Journal:  Sports (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-24

5.  What is the Effect of Changing Running Step Rate on Injury, Performance and Biomechanics? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Laura M Anderson; Joel F Martin; Christian J Barton; Daniel R Bonanno
Journal:  Sports Med Open       Date:  2022-09-04

6.  Maximum aerobic speed, maximum oxygen consumption, and running spatiotemporal parameters during an incremental test among middle- and long-distance runners and endurance non-running athletes.

Authors:  Arturo Casado; José Luis Tuimil; Xavier Iglesias; Miguel Fernández-Del-Olmo; Pedro Jiménez-Reyes; Rafael Martín-Acero; Ferran A Rodríguez
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2022-10-05       Impact factor: 3.061

Review 7.  Is There an Economical Running Technique? A Review of Modifiable Biomechanical Factors Affecting Running Economy.

Authors:  Isabel S Moore
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 11.136

8.  Optimal stride frequencies in running at different speeds.

Authors:  Ben T van Oeveren; Cornelis J de Ruiter; Peter J Beek; Jaap H van Dieën
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-10-23       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.