Literature DB >> 23948108

Impact of atrial fibrillation on early complications and one year-survival after cardioverter defibrillator implantation: results from the German DEVICE registry.

Julia Köbe1, Kristina Wasmer, Dietrich Andresen, Thomas Kleemann, Stefan G Spitzer, Joachim Jehle, Johannes Brachmann, Christoph Stellbrink, Matthias Hochadel, Jochen Senges, Helmut U Klein, Lars Eckardt.   

Abstract

AIMS AND
OBJECTIVE: Outcome data of patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) and atrial fibrillation (AF) are conflicting. The German DEVICE registry aims to add further information on this particular cohort. METHODS AND
RESULTS: The German DEVICE registry is a nationwide prospective multicenter database of ICD implantations. 3261 patients are included (81% males, 2701 (82.8%) first ICD implantations, 560 (17.2%) ICD replacements). Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT-D) was performed in 882 patients (27.0%). Sinus rhythm (SR) was present in 2654 (81.4%) and atrial fibrillation (AF) in 607 (18.6%). Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) did not differ between groups (SR 32.3%, AF 30.4%; p = 0.09). AF patients were older (AF 70.9 versus SR 63.9 years; p < 0.0001), presented with more co-morbidities (diabetes, hypertension, chronic kidney disease; all p < 0.001). In-hospital complications were not significantly different between groups (p = 0.58). Follow-up information after one year was available in 2967 patients (91%). One-year overall mortality after first ICD implantation was 4.9% for SR and 11.2% for AF patients (p < 0.0001); mortality one year after ICD replacement was 8.4% for SR and 12.0% for AF (p = 0.34). No statistically significant difference between SR and AF patients receiving a CRT device was observed (SR 6.9%, AF 10.7%, p = 0.16) in terms of one-year mortality.
CONCLUSION: The German DEVICE registry demonstrates that patients with AF who receive ICD devices are older, have more co-morbidity and more severe heart failure. AF carries an independent 1.39 fold risk (95% CI 1.02-1.89) of death after one year in patients only with first ICD implantation.
© 2013.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Atrial fibrillation; Complications; ICD; Mortality; Registry

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23948108     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.07.110

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiol        ISSN: 0167-5273            Impact factor:   4.164


  4 in total

1.  Clinical and serum-based markers are associated with death within 1 year of de novo implant in primary prevention ICD recipients.

Authors:  Yiyi Zhang; Eliseo Guallar; Elena Blasco-Colmenares; Darshan Dalal; Barbara Butcher; Sanaz Norgard; Fleur V Y Tjong; Zayd Eldadah; Timm Dickfeld; Kenneth A Ellenbogen; Joseph E Marine; Gordon F Tomaselli; Alan Cheng
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2014-10-30       Impact factor: 6.343

2.  Outcomes of cardiac resynchronisation therapy in patients with heart failure with atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.

Authors:  Usman Mustafa; Jessica Atkins; George Mina; Desiree Dawson; Catherine Vanchiere; Narendra Duddyala; Ryan Jones; Pratap Reddy; Paari Dominic
Journal:  Open Heart       Date:  2019-03-19

3.  Atrial Fibrillation Is Associated With Higher Overall Mortality in Patients With Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Usman Mustafa; Parinita Dherange; Rohit Reddy; Joseph DeVillier; Jessica Chong; Alarozia Ihsan; Ryan Jones; Narendra Duddyala; Pratap Reddy; Paari Dominic
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 5.501

4.  Predictors of rhythm outcomes after cardiac resynchronization therapy in atrial fibrillation patients: When should we use an atrial lead?

Authors:  Sotirios Nedios; Michael Doering; Angeliki Darma; Johannes Lucas; Borislav Dinov; Arash Arya; Nikolaos Dagres; Gerhard Hindricks; Andreas Bollmann; Sergio Richter; Kerstin Bode
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2020-12-09       Impact factor: 2.882

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.