Donna H McCree1, Gregorio Millett, Chanza Baytop, Scott Royal, Jonathan Ellen, Perry N Halkitis, Sandra A Kupprat, Sara Gillen. 1. Donna H. McCree is with the Division of HIV/AIDS Prevention, National Center for HIV, Viral Hepatitis, STD and TB Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia. Gregorio Millett is with Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Washington, DC. Chanza Baytop and Scott Royal are with Abt Associates, Bethesda, MD. Jonathan Ellen is with the Department of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD. Perry N. Halkitis and Sandra A. Kupprat are with the Center for Health, Identity, Behavior and Prevention Studies, Steinhardt School of Culture and Human Development, New York University, New York, NY. Sara Gillen is with Community Health Services, Harlem United, New York, NY.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: We report lessons derived from implementation of the Social Network Strategy (SNS) into existing HIV counseling, testing, and referral services targeting 18- to 64-year-old Black gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (MSM). METHODS: The SNS procedures used in this study were adapted from a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention-funded, 2-year demonstration project involving 9 community-based organizations (CBOs) in 7 cities. Under the SNS, HIV-positive and HIV-negative men at high risk for HIV (recruiters) were enlisted to identify and recruit persons from their social, sexual, or drug-using networks (network associates) for HIV testing. Sites maintained records of modified study protocols for ascertaining lessons learned. The study was conducted between April 2008 and May 2010 at CBOs in Washington, DC, and New York, New York, and at a health department in Baltimore, Maryland. RESULTS: Several common lessons regarding development of the plan, staffing, training, and use of incentives were identified across the sites. Collectively, these lessons indicate use of SNS is resource-intensive, requiring a detailed plan, dedicated staff, and continual input from clients and staff for successful implementation. CONCLUSIONS: SNS may provide a strategy for identifying and targeting clusters of high-risk Black MSM for HIV testing. Given the resources needed to implement the strategy, additional studies using an experimental design are needed to determine the cost-effectiveness of SNS compared with other testing strategies.
OBJECTIVES: We report lessons derived from implementation of the Social Network Strategy (SNS) into existing HIV counseling, testing, and referral services targeting 18- to 64-year-old Black gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (MSM). METHODS: The SNS procedures used in this study were adapted from a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention-funded, 2-year demonstration project involving 9 community-based organizations (CBOs) in 7 cities. Under the SNS, HIV-positive and HIV-negative men at high risk for HIV (recruiters) were enlisted to identify and recruit persons from their social, sexual, or drug-using networks (network associates) for HIV testing. Sites maintained records of modified study protocols for ascertaining lessons learned. The study was conducted between April 2008 and May 2010 at CBOs in Washington, DC, and New York, New York, and at a health department in Baltimore, Maryland. RESULTS: Several common lessons regarding development of the plan, staffing, training, and use of incentives were identified across the sites. Collectively, these lessons indicate use of SNS is resource-intensive, requiring a detailed plan, dedicated staff, and continual input from clients and staff for successful implementation. CONCLUSIONS: SNS may provide a strategy for identifying and targeting clusters of high-risk Black MSM for HIV testing. Given the resources needed to implement the strategy, additional studies using an experimental design are needed to determine the cost-effectiveness of SNS compared with other testing strategies.
Authors: Lisa W Kimbrough; Holly E Fisher; Kenneth T Jones; Wayne Johnson; Sekhar Thadiparthi; Samuel Dooley Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2009-04-16 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Alexandra M Oster; Ryan E Wiegand; Catlainn Sionean; Isa J Miles; Peter E Thomas; Lehida Melendez-Morales; Binh C Le; Gregorio A Millett Journal: AIDS Date: 2011-05-15 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Nina T Harawa; Sander Greenland; Trista A Bingham; Denise F Johnson; Susan D Cochran; William E Cunningham; David D Celentano; Beryl A Koblin; Marlene LaLota; Duncan A MacKellar; William McFarland; Douglas Shehan; Sue Stoyanoff; Hanne Thiede; Lucia Torian; Lucia A Valleroy Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2004-04-15 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Marya Gwadz; Charles M Cleland; David C Perlman; Holly Hagan; Samuel M Jenness; Noelle R Leonard; Amanda S Ritchie; Alexandra Kutnick Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2017-04-15 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Janet S St Lawrence; Jeffrey A Kelly; Julia Dickson-Gomez; Jill Owczarzak; Yuri A Amirkhanian; Cheryl Sitzler Journal: AIDS Educ Prev Date: 2015-06
Authors: Shanell L McGoy; April C Pettit; Melissa Morrison; Leah R Alexander; Phadre Johnson; Brandon Williams; Darion Banister; Mary K Young; Carolyn Wester; Peter F Rebeiro Journal: Public Health Rep Date: 2018 Nov/Dec Impact factor: 2.792
Authors: Mesfin S Mulatu; Tamika Hoyte; Kim M Williams; Raekiela D Taylor; Thomas Painter; Pilgrim Spikes; Cynthia Prather; William L Jeffries; Kirk Henny; Tanjina Shabu Journal: Public Health Rep Date: 2018 Nov/Dec Impact factor: 2.792