| Literature DB >> 23946697 |
Yan Lan1, Yan-Zhao Yang, Xian Jiang, Li-Wei Li, Guang-Shi Jin, Min Sun Kim, Byung Rim Park, Yuan-Zhe Jin.
Abstract
Contribution of the vestibular end organ to regulation of arterial pressure was quantitatively compared with the role of baroreceptors in terms of baroreflex sensitivity and c-Fos protein expression in the rostral ventrolateral medulla (RVLM). Baroreflex sensitivity and c-Fos protein expression in the RVLM were measured in conscious rats that had undergone bilateral labyrinthectomy (BL) and/or baroreceptor unloading. BL attenuated baroreflex sensitivity during intravenous infusion of sodium nitroprusside (SNP), but did not significantly affect the sensitivity following infusion of phenylephrine (PE). Baroreflex sensitivity became positive following sinoaortic denervation (SAD) during infusion of PE and attenuated sensitivity during infusion of SNP. Baroreflex sensitivity also became positive following double ablation (BL+SAD) during infusion of PE, and attenuated sensitivity during infusion of SNP. c-Fos protein expression increased significantly in the RVLM in the sham group after SNP administration. However, the BL, SAD, and SAD+BL groups showed significant decreases in c-Fos protein expression compared with that in the sham group. The SAD group showed more reduced c-Fos protein expression than that in the BL group, and the SAD+BL group showed less expression than that in the SAD group. These results suggest that the vestibular system cooperates with baroreceptors to maintain arterial pressure during hypotension but that baroreceptors regulate arterial pressure during both hypotension and hypertension. Additionally, afferent signals for maintaining blood pressure from the vestibular end organs and the baroreceptors may be integrated in the RVLM.Entities:
Keywords: Baroreceptor; Blood pressure; Rostral ventrolateral medulla; Vestibular system; c-Fos protein
Year: 2013 PMID: 23946697 PMCID: PMC3741494 DOI: 10.4196/kjpp.2013.17.4.367
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Korean J Physiol Pharmacol ISSN: 1226-4512 Impact factor: 2.016
Effect of phenylephrine on MAP and HR
MAP, mean arterial pressure; HR, heart rate; sham, sham treated; BL, bilateral labyrinthectomy; SAD, sinoaortic denervation; SAD+BL, double destruction (8 rats/group). Values are means±standard errors. *Significant difference compared with values before intravenous infusion of phenylephrine (**p<0.01).
Effect of sodium nitroprusside on MAP and HR
MAP, mean arterial pressure; HR, heart rate; sham, sham treated; BL, bilateral labyrinthectomy; SAD, sinoaortic denervation; SAD+BL, double destruction (8 rats/group). Values are means±standard errors. *Significant difference compared with values before intravenous infusion of sodium nitroprusside (**p<0.01).
Fig. 1Change in baroreflex sensitivity in the bilateral labyrinthectomy (BL), sinoaortic denervation (SAD), and double destruction (SAD+BL) groups. (A) intravenous infusion of phenylephrine; (B) intravenous infusion of sodium nitroprusside. Sham, sham treated; BL, bilateral labyrinthectomy; SAD, sinoaortic denervation; SAD+BL, double destruction (8 rats/group). Values are means±standard errors. *Significant difference compared with sham group (**p<0.01); †Significant difference compared with BL group (‡p<0.01); ⋆Significant difference compared with SAD group (⋆⋆p<0.01).
Fig. 2Photomicrographs showing the effect of sodium nitroprusside (SNP) infusion on expression of c-Fos protein in the rostral ventrolateral medulla. Expression of c-Fos protein was measured 90 min after SNP infusion. Sham, sham treated; BL, bilateral labyrinthectomy; SAD, sinoaortic denervation; SAD+BL, double destruction. RVLM, rostral ventrolateral medulla (the coordinate: 11.90 mm posterior to bregma). Scale bar=10 µm.
Fig. 3Effect of sodium nitroprusside (SNP) infusion on expression of c-Fos protein in the rostral ventrolateral medulla. Sham, sham treated; BL, bilateral labyrinthectomy; SAD, sinoaortic denervation; SAD+BL, double destruction (6 rats/group). Values are means± standard errors. *Significant difference compared with group injected with saline (**p<0.01 ). #Significant difference compared with sham group injected with SNP (##p<0.01); @Significant difference compared with BL group injected with SNP (@@p<0.01); ⋆Significant difference compared with SAD group injected with SNP (⋆⋆p<0.01); †Significant difference compared with sham group injected with saline (‡p<0.05).