Literature DB >> 23946327

Impact of the World Health Organization's Decision-Making Tool for Family Planning Clients and Providers on the quality of family planning services in Iran.

Hamidreza Farrokh-Eslamlou1, Siamak Aghlmand, Mohammad Eslami, Caroline S E Homer.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We investigated whether use of the World Health Organization's (WHO's) Decision-Making Tool (DMT) for Family Planning Clients and Providers would improve the process and outcome quality indicators of family planning (FP) services in Iran.
METHODS: The DMT was adapted for the Iranian setting. The study evaluated 24 FP quality key indicators grouped into two main areas, namely process and outcome. The tool was implemented in 52 urban and rural public health facilities in four selected and representative provinces of Iran. A pre-post methodology was undertaken to examine whether use of the tool improved the quality of FP services and client satisfaction with the services. Quantitative data were collected through observations of counselling and exit interviews with clients using structured questionnaires.
RESULTS: Different numbers of FP clients were recruited during the baseline and the post-intervention rounds (n=448 vs 547, respectively). The DMT improved many client-provider interaction indicators, including verbal and non-verbal communication (p<0.05). The tool also impacted positively on the client's choice of contraceptive method, providers' technical competence, and quality of information provided to clients (p<0.05). Use of the tool improved the clients' satisfaction with FP services (from 72% to 99%; p<0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: The adapted WHO's DMT has the potential to improve the quality of FP services.

Keywords:  education and training; family planning service provision

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23946327     DOI: 10.1136/jfprhc-2012-100290

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care        ISSN: 1471-1893


  6 in total

1.  The family planning "know-do" gap among married women of reproductive age in urban Pakistan.

Authors:  S Yameen; S Nausheen; I Hussain; K Hackett; A Rizvi; U Ansari; Z S Lassi; D Canning; I Shah; S B Soofi
Journal:  Public Health Action       Date:  2021-09-21

2.  Dissemination and use of WHO family planning guidance and tools: a qualitative assessment.

Authors:  Joan Marie Kraft; Titilope Oduyebo; Tara C Jatlaoui; Kathryn M Curtis; Maura K Whiteman; Lauren B Zapata; Mary Eluned Gaffield
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2018-05-22

3.  Efficacy of a Digital Health Tool on Contraceptive Ideation and Use in Nigeria: Results of a Cluster-Randomized Control Trial.

Authors:  Stella Babalola; Caitlin Loehr; Olamide Oyenubi; Akinsewa Akiode; Allison Mobley
Journal:  Glob Health Sci Pract       Date:  2019-06-27

4.  Interventions to improve participation in health-care decisions in non-Western countries: A systematic review and narrative synthesis.

Authors:  Hankiz Dolan; Mu Li; Lyndal Trevena
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2019-06-09       Impact factor: 3.377

5.  Evaluation of family planning service delivery in Gondar city public health facilities, Northwest Ethiopia: A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Sefiw Abay; Tsega Hagos; Endalkachew Dellie; Lake Yazachew; Getachew Teshale; Ayal Debie
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-09-23       Impact factor: 3.752

6.  A systematic review of the effectiveness of counselling strategies for modern contraceptive methods: what works and what doesn't?

Authors:  Francesca L Cavallaro; Lenka Benova; Onikepe O Owolabi; Moazzam Ali
Journal:  BMJ Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2019-12-11
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.