Christopher V DeSimone1, Paul A Friedman, Amit Noheria, Nikhil A Patel, Daniel C DeSimone, Sami Bdeir, Christopher A Aakre, Vaibhav R Vaidya, Joshua P Slusser, David O Hodge, Michael J Ackerman, Alejandro A Rabinstein, Samuel J Asirvatham. 1. Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (C.V.D, D.C.D, C.A.A, V.R.V.); Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (C.V.D, P.A.F., M.J.A, S.J.A.); Division of Cardiology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA (A.N.); Mayo Medical School, Rochester, MN (N.A.P.); Mayo Graduate School of Medicine Visiting Scholars Program, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (S.B.); Department of Statistics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (J.P.S., D.O.H.); Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (M.J.A., S.J.A.); and Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (A.A.R.).
Abstract
BACKGROUND: A patent foramen ovale (PFO) may permit arterial embolization of thrombi that accumulate on the leads of cardiac implantable electronic devices in the right-sided cardiac chambers. We sought to determine whether a PFO increases the risk of stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA) in patients with endocardial leads. METHODS AND RESULTS: We retrospectively evaluated all patients who had endocardial leads implanted between January 1, 2000, and October 25, 2010, at Mayo Clinic Rochester. Echocardiography was used to establish definite PFO and non-PFO cohorts. The primary end point of stroke/TIA consistent with a cardioembolic etiology and the secondary end point of mortality during postimplantation follow-up were compared in PFO versus non-PFO patients with the use of Cox proportional hazards models. We analyzed 6075 patients (364 with PFO) followed for a mean 4.7 ± 3.1 years. The primary end point of stroke/TIA was met in 30/364 (8.2%) PFO versus 117/5711 (2.0%) non-PFO patients (hazard ratio, 3.49; 95% confidence interval, 2.33-5.25; P<0.0001). The association of PFO with stroke/TIA remained significant after multivariable adjustment for age, sex, history of stroke/TIA, atrial fibrillation, and baseline aspirin/warfarin use (hazard ratio, 3.30; 95% confidence interval, 2.19-4.96; P<0.0001). There was no significant difference in all-cause mortality between PFO and non-PFO patients (hazard ratio, 0.91; 95% confidence interval, 0.77-1.07; P=0.25). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with endocardial leads, the presence of a PFO on routine echocardiography is associated with a substantially increased risk of embolic stroke/TIA. This finding suggests a role of screening for PFOs in patients who require cardiac implantable electronic devices; if a PFO is detected, PFO closure, anticoagulation, or nonvascular lead placement may be considered.
BACKGROUND: A patent foramen ovale (PFO) may permit arterial embolization of thrombi that accumulate on the leads of cardiac implantable electronic devices in the right-sided cardiac chambers. We sought to determine whether a PFO increases the risk of stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA) in patients with endocardial leads. METHODS AND RESULTS: We retrospectively evaluated all patients who had endocardial leads implanted between January 1, 2000, and October 25, 2010, at Mayo Clinic Rochester. Echocardiography was used to establish definite PFO and non-PFO cohorts. The primary end point of stroke/TIA consistent with a cardioembolic etiology and the secondary end point of mortality during postimplantation follow-up were compared in PFO versus non-PFO patients with the use of Cox proportional hazards models. We analyzed 6075 patients (364 with PFO) followed for a mean 4.7 ± 3.1 years. The primary end point of stroke/TIA was met in 30/364 (8.2%) PFO versus 117/5711 (2.0%) non-PFO patients (hazard ratio, 3.49; 95% confidence interval, 2.33-5.25; P<0.0001). The association of PFO with stroke/TIA remained significant after multivariable adjustment for age, sex, history of stroke/TIA, atrial fibrillation, and baseline aspirin/warfarin use (hazard ratio, 3.30; 95% confidence interval, 2.19-4.96; P<0.0001). There was no significant difference in all-cause mortality between PFO and non-PFO patients (hazard ratio, 0.91; 95% confidence interval, 0.77-1.07; P=0.25). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with endocardial leads, the presence of a PFO on routine echocardiography is associated with a substantially increased risk of embolic stroke/TIA. This finding suggests a role of screening for PFOs in patients who require cardiac implantable electronic devices; if a PFO is detected, PFO closure, anticoagulation, or nonvascular lead placement may be considered.
Entities:
Keywords:
International Classification of Diseases; defibrillators; foramen ovale, patent; ischemic attack, transient; pacemaker, artificial; stroke
Authors: Kolade M Agboola; Jin-Moo Lee; Xiaoyan Liu; Eric Novak; Phillip S Cuculich; Daniel H Cooper; Amit Noheria Journal: Pacing Clin Electrophysiol Date: 2019-01-31 Impact factor: 1.976
Authors: Ammar M Killu; Niyada Naksuk; Zdeněk Stárek; Christopher V DeSimone; Faisal F Syed; Prakriti Gaba; Jiří Wolf; Frantisek Lehar; Martin Pesl; Pavel Leinveber; Michal Crha; Dorothy Ladewig; Joanne Powers; Scott Suddendorf; David O Hodge; Gaurav Satam; Miroslav Novák; Tomas Kara; Charles J Bruce; Paul A Friedman; Samuel J Asirvatham Journal: JACC Clin Electrophysiol Date: 2017-07
Authors: Christopher V DeSimone; Elisa Madhavan; Sébastien Ebrille; Alejandro A Rabinstein; Paul A Friedman; Samuel J Asirvatham Journal: J Atr Fibrillation Date: 2013-12-31
Authors: Charles J Lenz; Christopher V DeSimone; Shiva P Ponamgi; Alan Sugrue; Lawrence J Sinak; Krishnaswamy Chandrasekaran; Douglas L Packer; Samuel J Asirvatham Journal: J Interv Card Electrophysiol Date: 2016-02-22 Impact factor: 1.900
Authors: Vaibhav R Vaidya; Christopher V DeSimone; Samuel J Asirvatham; Vishnu M Chandra; Amit Noheria; David O Hodge; Joshua P Slusser; Alejandro A Rabinstein; Paul A Friedman Journal: J Interv Card Electrophysiol Date: 2014-04-27 Impact factor: 1.900
Authors: Amit Noheria; Shiva P Ponamgi; Christopher V Desimone; Vaibhav R Vaidya; Christopher A Aakre; Elisa Ebrille; Tiffany Hu; David O Hodge; Joshua P Slusser; Naser M Ammash; Charles J Bruce; Alejandro A Rabinstein; Paul A Friedman; Samuel J Asirvatham Journal: Europace Date: 2015-03-12 Impact factor: 5.214
Authors: Shiva P Ponamgi; Vaibhav R Vaidya; Christopher V Desimone; Amit Noheria; David O Hodge; Joshua P Slusser; Naser M Ammash; Charles J Bruce; Alejandro A Rabinstein; Paul A Friedman; Samuel J Asirvatham Journal: Pacing Clin Electrophysiol Date: 2017-02-07 Impact factor: 1.976
Authors: Alan Sugrue; Christopher V DeSimone; Charles J Lenz; Douglas L Packer; Samuel J Asirvatham Journal: J Interv Card Electrophysiol Date: 2015-12-09 Impact factor: 1.900
Authors: Christopher V DeSimone; Malini Madhavan; Elisa Ebrille; Alejandro A Rabinstein; Paul A Friedman; Samuel J Asirvatham Journal: Card Electrophysiol Clin Date: 2014-03