OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of transtympanic L-N-Acetylcysteine (L-NAC) administration in patients receivingcisplatin chemotherapyfor head and neck cancer. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective randomized nonblinded open-label clinical trial. METHODS:Transtympanic 2% L-NAC was administered to one randomly selected ear with the other ear as control in each patient. Primary outcome parameter was the difference in the loss of pure tone averages (PTA) at 2, 4, and 8 kHz between the L-NAC and control ear at 1 to 2 months following chemotherapy. RESULTS: Eleven patients completed the study, with two patients demonstrating significantly better hearing in the L-NAC treated ear (18.2%). However, for the overall group, the difference in hearing preservation did not reach significance. Two percent L-NAC administration was well tolerated in this patient population. There were no adverse effects associated with L-NAC. CONCLUSION: Although the study did not demonstrate a significant benefit overall, transtympanic L-NAC was associated with significantly better hearing in two patients. Better delivery methods may improve the efficacy of this treatment. L-NAC remains a promising drug in preventing cisplatin-induced ototoxicity.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of transtympanic L-N-Acetylcysteine (L-NAC) administration in patients receiving cisplatin chemotherapy for head and neck cancer. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective randomized nonblinded open-label clinical trial. METHODS: Transtympanic 2% L-NAC was administered to one randomly selected ear with the other ear as control in each patient. Primary outcome parameter was the difference in the loss of pure tone averages (PTA) at 2, 4, and 8 kHz between the L-NAC and control ear at 1 to 2 months following chemotherapy. RESULTS: Eleven patients completed the study, with two patients demonstrating significantly better hearing in the L-NAC treated ear (18.2%). However, for the overall group, the difference in hearing preservation did not reach significance. Two percent L-NAC administration was well tolerated in this patient population. There were no adverse effects associated with L-NAC. CONCLUSION: Although the study did not demonstrate a significant benefit overall, transtympanic L-NAC was associated with significantly better hearing in two patients. Better delivery methods may improve the efficacy of this treatment. L-NAC remains a promising drug in preventing cisplatin-induced ototoxicity.
Authors: Naomi Lomeli; Kaijun Di; Jennifer Czerniawski; John F Guzowski; Daniela A Bota Journal: Free Radic Biol Med Date: 2016-11-28 Impact factor: 7.376
Authors: Andrew C Little; Arvis Sulovari; Karamatullah Danyal; David E Heppner; David J Seward; Albert van der Vliet Journal: Free Radic Biol Med Date: 2017-05-31 Impact factor: 7.376
Authors: Mohammad N Kayyali; Andrew J Ramsey; Elizabeth M Higbee-Dempsey; Lesan Yan; Bert W O'Malley; Andrew Tsourkas; Daqing Li Journal: J Assoc Res Otolaryngol Date: 2018-01-18
Authors: David R Freyer; Penelope R Brock; Kay W Chang; L Lee Dupuis; Sidnei Epelman; Kristin Knight; Denise Mills; Robert Phillips; Emma Potter; Demie Risby; Philippa Simpkin; Michael Sullivan; Sandra Cabral; Paula D Robinson; Lillian Sung Journal: Lancet Child Adolesc Health Date: 2019-12-19