Literature DB >> 23946100

Assessment of protein disorder region predictions in CASP10.

Bohdan Monastyrskyy1, Andriy Kryshtafovych, John Moult, Anna Tramontano, Krzysztof Fidelis.   

Abstract

The article presents the assessment of disorder region predictions submitted to CASP10. The evaluation is based on the three measures tested in previous CASPs: (i) balanced accuracy, (ii) the Matthews correlation coefficient for the binary predictions, and (iii) the area under the curve in the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis of predictions using probability annotation. We also performed new analyses such as comparison of the submitted predictions with those obtained with a Naïve disorder prediction method and with predictions from the disorder prediction databases D2P2 and MobiDB. On average, the methods participating in CASP10 demonstrated slightly better performance than those in CASP9.
Copyright © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CASP; assessment of disorder prediction; intrinsically disordered proteins; prediction of disordered regions; unstructured proteins

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23946100      PMCID: PMC4406047          DOI: 10.1002/prot.24391

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteins        ISSN: 0887-3585


  31 in total

1.  The Protein Data Bank.

Authors:  H M Berman; J Westbrook; Z Feng; G Gilliland; T N Bhat; H Weissig; I N Shindyalov; P E Bourne
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 2.  Intrinsically unstructured proteins: re-assessing the protein structure-function paradigm.

Authors:  P E Wright; H J Dyson
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1999-10-22       Impact factor: 5.469

3.  Comprehensive comparative assessment of in-silico predictors of disordered regions.

Authors:  Zhen-Ling Peng; Lukasz Kurgan
Journal:  Curr Protein Pept Sci       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 3.272

4.  Definition and classification of evaluation units for CASP10.

Authors:  Todd J Taylor; Chin-Hsien Tai; Yuanpeng J Huang; Jeremy Block; Hongjun Bai; Andriy Kryshtafovych; Gaetano T Montelione; Byungkook Lee
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2013-11-22

5.  An assignment of intrinsically disordered regions of proteins based on NMR structures.

Authors:  Motonori Ota; Ryotaro Koike; Takayuki Amemiya; Takeshi Tenno; Pedro R Romero; Hidekazu Hiroaki; A Keith Dunker; Satoshi Fukuchi
Journal:  J Struct Biol       Date:  2012-11-07       Impact factor: 2.867

6.  Intrinsic protein disorder in complete genomes.

Authors:  A K Dunker; Z Obradovic; P Romero; E C Garner; C J Brown
Journal:  Genome Inform Ser Workshop Genome Inform       Date:  2000

Review 7.  Bioinformatical approaches to characterize intrinsically disordered/unstructured proteins.

Authors:  Zsuzsanna Dosztányi; Bálint Mészáros; István Simon
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2009-12-10       Impact factor: 11.622

8.  Prediction and functional analysis of native disorder in proteins from the three kingdoms of life.

Authors:  J J Ward; J S Sodhi; L J McGuffin; B F Buxton; D T Jones
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2004-03-26       Impact factor: 5.469

9.  UniProt Knowledgebase: a hub of integrated protein data.

Authors:  Michele Magrane
Journal:  Database (Oxford)       Date:  2011-03-29       Impact factor: 3.451

Review 10.  A decade and a half of protein intrinsic disorder: biology still waits for physics.

Authors:  Vladimir N Uversky
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2013-04-29       Impact factor: 6.725

View more
  63 in total

1.  Resolving the ambiguity: Making sense of intrinsic disorder when PDB structures disagree.

Authors:  Shelly DeForte; Vladimir N Uversky
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2016-01-09       Impact factor: 6.725

2.  How disordered is my protein and what is its disorder for? A guide through the "dark side" of the protein universe.

Authors:  Philippe Lieutaud; François Ferron; Alexey V Uversky; Lukasz Kurgan; Vladimir N Uversky; Sonia Longhi
Journal:  Intrinsically Disord Proteins       Date:  2016-12-21

3.  Genes encoding intrinsic disorder in Eukaryota have high GC content.

Authors:  Zhenling Peng; Vladimir N Uversky; Lukasz Kurgan
Journal:  Intrinsically Disord Proteins       Date:  2016-12-15

Review 4.  Comprehensive review of methods for prediction of intrinsic disorder and its molecular functions.

Authors:  Fanchi Meng; Vladimir N Uversky; Lukasz Kurgan
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2017-06-06       Impact factor: 9.261

Review 5.  Principles and Overview of Sampling Methods for Modeling Macromolecular Structure and Dynamics.

Authors:  Tatiana Maximova; Ryan Moffatt; Buyong Ma; Ruth Nussinov; Amarda Shehu
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 4.475

6.  AUCpreD: proteome-level protein disorder prediction by AUC-maximized deep convolutional neural fields.

Authors:  Sheng Wang; Jianzhu Ma; Jinbo Xu
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 6.937

7.  Prediction of secondary structure population and intrinsic disorder of proteins using multitask deep learning.

Authors:  Xu Ying; Andre Leier; Tatiana T Marquez-Lago; Jue Xie; Antonio Jose Jimeno Yepes; James C Whisstock; Campbell Wilson; Jiangning Song
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2021-01-25

8.  IDPology of the living cell: intrinsic disorder in the subcellular compartments of the human cell.

Authors:  Bi Zhao; Akila Katuwawala; Vladimir N Uversky; Lukasz Kurgan
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2020-09-30       Impact factor: 9.261

9.  Protein structure prediction.

Authors:  Haiyou Deng; Ya Jia; Yang Zhang
Journal:  Int J Mod Phys B       Date:  2017-12-11       Impact factor: 1.219

10.  DISOselect: Disorder predictor selection at the protein level.

Authors:  Akila Katuwawala; Christopher J Oldfield; Lukasz Kurgan
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2019-11-07       Impact factor: 6.725

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.