A Bertsche 1 , A-J Dahse , M P Neininger , M K Bernhard , S Syrbe , R Frontini , W Kiess , A Merkenschlager , T Bertsche . Show Affiliations »
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Anticonvulsants require special consideration particularly at the interface from hospital to ambulatory care. PATIENTS AND METHOD: Observational study for 6 months with prospectively enrolled consecutive patients in a neuropediatric ward of a university hospital (age 0-<18 years) with long-term therapy of at least one anticonvulsant. Assessment of outpatient prescriptions after discharge. Parent interviews for emergency treatment for acute seizures and safety precautions. RESULTS: We identified changes of the brand in 19/82 (23%) patients caused by hospital's discharge letters (4/82; 5%) or in ambulatory care (15/82; 18%). In 37/76 (49%) of patients who were deemed to require rescue medication, no recommendation for such a medication was included in the discharge letters. 17/76 (22%) of the respective parents stated that they had no immediate access to rescue medication. Safety precautions were applicable in 44 epilepsy patients. We identified knowledge deficits in 27/44 (61%) of parents. CONCLUSION: Switching of brands after discharge was frequent. In the discharge letters, rescue medications were insufficiently recommended. Additionally, parents frequently displayed knowledge deficits in risk management. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.
BACKGROUND: Anticonvulsants require special consideration particularly at the interface from hospital to ambulatory care. PATIENTS AND METHOD: Observational study for 6 months with prospectively enrolled consecutive patients in a neuropediatric ward of a university hospital (age 0-<18 years) with long-term therapy of at least one anticonvulsant. Assessment of outpatient prescriptions after discharge. Parent interviews for emergency treatment for acute seizures and safety precautions. RESULTS: We identified changes of the brand in 19/82 (23%) patients caused by hospital's discharge letters (4/82; 5%) or in ambulatory care (15/82; 18%). In 37/76 (49%) of patients who were deemed to require rescue medication, no recommendation for such a medication was included in the discharge letters. 17/76 (22%) of the respective parents stated that they had no immediate access to rescue medication. Safety precautions were applicable in 44 epilepsy patients . We identified knowledge deficits in 27/44 (61%) of parents. CONCLUSION: Switching of brands after discharge was frequent. In the discharge letters, rescue medications were insufficiently recommended. Additionally, parents frequently displayed knowledge deficits in risk management. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.
Entities: Disease
Species
Mesh: See more »
Substances: See more »
Year: 2013
PMID: 23946090 DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1345174
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Klin Padiatr ISSN: 0300-8630 Impact factor: 1.349