Literature DB >> 23945677

Teleconsultations reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

Tiago Cravo Oliveira1, James Barlow, Luís Gonçalves, Steffen Bayer.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Health services contribute significantly to greenhouse gas emissions. New models of delivering care closer to patients have the potential to reduce travelling and associated emissions. We aimed to compare the emissions of patients attending a teleconsultation - an outpatient appointment using video-conferencing equipment - with those of patients attending a face-to-face appointment.
METHODS: We estimated the total distances travelled and the direct and indirect greenhouse gas emissions for 20,824 teleconsultations performed between 2004 and 2011 in Alentejo, a Portuguese region. These were compared to the distances and emissions that would have resulted if teleconsultations were not available and patients had to attend face-to-face outpatient appointments. Estimates were calculated using survey data on mode of transport, and national aggregate data for car engine size and fuel. A sensitivity analysis using the lower and upper quartiles for survey distances was performed.
RESULTS: Teleconsultations led to reductions in distances and emissions of 95%. 2,313,819 km of travelling and 455 tonnes of greenhouse gas emissions were avoided (22 kg of carbon dioxide equivalent per patient). The incorporation of modes of transport and car engine size and fuel in the analysis led to emission estimates which were 12% smaller than those assuming all patients used an average car.
CONCLUSIONS: The availability of remote care services can significantly reduce road travel and associated emissions. At a time when many countries are committed to reducing their carbon footprint, it is desirable to explore how these reductions could be incorporated into technology assessments and economic evaluations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  carbon footprint; remote consultation; telemedicine

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23945677     DOI: 10.1177/1355819613492717

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Health Serv Res Policy        ISSN: 1355-8196


  7 in total

Review 1.  Does telemedicine reduce the carbon footprint of healthcare? A systematic review.

Authors:  Amy Purohit; James Smith; Arthur Hibble
Journal:  Future Healthc J       Date:  2021-03

2.  The environmental impacts of telemedicine in place of face-to-face patient care: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ramyadevi Ravindrane; Jay Patel
Journal:  Future Healthc J       Date:  2022-03

3.  A Transparency Checklist for Carbon Footprint Calculations Applied within a Systematic Review of Virtual Care Interventions.

Authors:  Oliver Lange; Julian Plath; Timo F Dziggel; David F Karpa; Mattis Keil; Tom Becker; Wolf H Rogowski
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-06-18       Impact factor: 4.614

4.  Environmental and Patient Impact of Applying a Point-of-Care Ultrasound Model in Primary Care: Rural vs. Urban Centres.

Authors:  Francesc X Marín-Gomez; Jacobo Mendioroz Peña; Vicenç Canal Casals; Marcos Romero Mendez; Ana Darnés Surroca; Antoni Nieto Maclino; Josep Vidal-Alaball
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Impact on the reduction of CO2 emissions due to the use of telemedicine.

Authors:  César Morcillo Serra; Ana Aroca Tanarro; Catherine Mary Cummings; Araceli Jimenez Fuertes; José Francisco Tomás Martínez
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 4.996

6.  Carbon footprint modelling of national health systems: Opportunities, challenges and recommendations.

Authors:  Amy Booth
Journal:  Int J Health Plann Manage       Date:  2022-02-24

7.  Impact of a Telemedicine Program on the Reduction in the Emission of Atmospheric Pollutants and Journeys by Road.

Authors:  Josep Vidal-Alaball; Jordi Franch-Parella; Francesc Lopez Seguí; Francesc Garcia Cuyàs; Jacobo Mendioroz Peña
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-11-08       Impact factor: 3.390

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.