Literature DB >> 23945408

Acute effects of oral preloads with increasing energy density on gastric emptying, gut hormone release, thermogenesis and energy intake, in overweight and obese men.

Natalie D Luscombe-Marsh1, Radhika V Seimon, Erin Bollmeyer, Judith M Wishart, Gary A Wittert, Michael Horowitz, Max Bellon, Christine Feinle-Bisset.   

Abstract

This study investigated the effect of high- and low-energy density preloads on gastrointestinal and metabolic factors, which act to regulate acute energy intake. Sixteen overweight and obese men (BMI range: 27.2-36.5 kg/m2) each received 3 oral preloads in randomised order: i) high-energy-density, high-fat (1.5 kcal/g), ii) low-energy density, high-fat (1.1 kcal/g), and iii) low-energy-density, high-protein (1.1 kcal/g). Over 180 min, gastric emptying, plasma glucagon-like peptide-1 concentrations, and diet-induced thermogenesis were assessed, and subsequent energy intake was determined. Total energy intake did not differ between preloads (high-energy-density, high-fat, 2059±72 kilocalories (kcal); low-energy-density, high-fat, 1876±91 kcal; and low-energy-density, high protein, 1867±63 kcal). Gastric emptying was slower following the high-energy-density, high-fat preload (158±8 min) compared with the low-energy-density, high-protein preload (130±9 min) (p=0.05), but did not differ between the high-energy-density, high-fat and low-energy-density, high-fat (147±8 min) preloads. Plasma glucagon- like peptide-1 did not differ substantially between preloads. Diet-induced thermogenesis was lower following high-energy-density, high-fat (10.4±0.7 %) than low-energy-density, high-fat (14.9±1.2 %) and low-energy density, high-protein (18.1±1.1 %) preloads (p<0.01 for both). We conclude that an increased energy density slows gastric emptying and reduces thermogenesis, but that a high fat content overrides the effect of energy density on gastric emptying. The counter-regulatory modulation of these gastric and metabolic factors may explain, at least in part, the lack of differences in subsequent energy intake in response to oral preloads with increasing energy density.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23945408     DOI: 10.6133/apjcn.2013.22.3.11

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Asia Pac J Clin Nutr        ISSN: 0964-7058            Impact factor:   1.662


  5 in total

1.  Anti-obesity Effects of Ginsenosides in High-Fat Diet-Fed Rats.

Authors:  Hyun-Jung Park; Ji Hyun Kim; Insop Shim
Journal:  Chin J Integr Med       Date:  2019-05-30       Impact factor: 1.978

Review 2.  Gut-Based Strategies to Reduce Postprandial Glycaemia in Type 2 Diabetes.

Authors:  Md Kamruzzaman; Michael Horowitz; Karen L Jones; Chinmay S Marathe
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-04-09       Impact factor: 5.555

3.  Deciphering the Relationship between Obesity and Various Diseases from a Network Perspective.

Authors:  Lei Chen; Yu-Hang Zhang; JiaRui Li; ShaoPeng Wang; YunHua Zhang; Tao Huang; Yu-Dong Cai
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2017-12-18       Impact factor: 4.096

Review 4.  Neuronal mechanisms of ginseng on antiobesity effects: implication of its synergistic benefits with physical exercise.

Authors:  Hyun Jung Park; Sung Ja Rhie; Insop Shim
Journal:  J Exerc Rehabil       Date:  2021-12-27

5.  Association of Dietary Energy Intake With Constipation Among Men and Women: Results From the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.

Authors:  Shuai Yang; Xiao-Li Wu; Shou-Qing Wang; Xiang-Ling Guo; Fu-Zheng Guo; Xiao-Feng Sun
Journal:  Front Nutr       Date:  2022-04-12
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.