Literature DB >> 23945244

[Clinical significance of detection of cathepsin X and cystatin C in the sera of patients with lung cancer].

Xuede Zhang1, Yanli Hou, Zequn Niu, Wei Li, Xia Meng, Na Zhang, Shuanying Yang.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
OBJECTIVE: Cathepsin X (Cat X) has been identified as a member of cathepsin family. Studies have shown that Cat X is involved in tumorigenesis and tumor development of various cancers. The aim of this study is to investigate the relationship between the clinicopathological prognosis and the levels of Cat X and cystatin C in the serum of patients with lung cancer.
METHODS: Blood samples were collected from 84 patients with lung cancer and 36 healthy control subjects. Cat X and cystatin C were determined by quantitative ELISA.
RESULTS: Cat X and cystatin C levels were significantly higher in the patients with lung cancer than that in the healthy control subjects (P<0.01). Cat X level was correlated with the pathological types of lung cancer (P=0.076). Cystatin C was positively correlated with TNM stage (P=0.01). Furthermore, cystatin C/Cat X was correlated with lymph node metastasis (P=0.058). The patients with high Cat X levels experienced significantly shorter overall survival rates compared with those with low Cat X. Univariate analysis indicated that Cat X and TNM stage were related to overall survival. Multivariate Cox analysis indicated that TNM stage may be used as an independent prognostic variable in patients with lung cancer.
CONCLUSIONS: Cat X and cystatin C levels were significantly higher in patients with lung cancer. Cat X and cystatin C detection in the sera may contribute to the diagnosis of lung cancer and may be used to evaluate the prognosis of patients with NSCLC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23945244      PMCID: PMC6000661          DOI: 10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2013.08.04

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi        ISSN: 1009-3419


组织蛋白酶(Cathepsins, Cats)属于溶酶体半胱氨酸蛋白酶,最初发现涉及到溶酶体内蛋白转换,近年来研究[表明,还参与肿瘤的发生、发展、转移,有希望成为新的肿瘤诊断和预后判断标记物。Cat B、Cat L等在肺癌、乳腺癌、头颈癌及结肠癌等肿瘤中表达明显增高,且高表达的患者预后更差,对预测肿瘤的复发和预后有潜在价值[。Cat X是最近发现的一种Cats家族成员,它的结构和功能特点明显不同于其它Cats,有一个区别于其它Cats的非常短的原区(pro-region)和一个独特的迷你环(mini-loop),Cat X不像其它Cats作为肽链内切酶发挥生物学作用,而靠水解羧基端氨基酸起作用。Cat X表达主要局限于各类免疫细胞中,如单核、巨噬细胞及树突状细胞[。它涉及到细胞间信号传导、细胞粘附、增生以及迁移等作用[。研究表明Cat X表达上调与幽门螺旋杆菌感染[、多发创伤[、肺结核[有关,也有报道发现Cat X在前列腺癌[、胃癌[、恶性黑色素瘤[中表达明显增高。此外,已经在多种肿瘤中发现染色体20q13中编码Cat X基因明显扩增[。 Cystatin C是半胱氨酸蛋白酶抑制剂蛋白质中的一种,在所有的有核细胞内以恒定速度持续转录与表达,无组织特异性,并存在于各种体液之中,不受年龄、性别、体重、炎症等因素影响,是一种反映肾小球滤过情况的重要指标。目前研究[表明,它作为Cats抑制剂与Cats互相作用参与肿瘤发生、发展。近期研究发现血液、体液中cystatin C高表达的患者预后差,有希望作为预测肿瘤预后标记物。 目前为止,我们尚未发现肺癌患者血清Cat X的研究,cystatin C在肺癌患者血清研究的报道也少见,cystatin C作为Cats强有力的抑制剂,它与Cat X血清表达水平之间可能存在相关性。目前已有cystatin CCat B、Cat L的相关性研究,但是尚无cystatin CCat X之间的研究。本研究旨在检测肺癌患者和健康人血清Cat Xcystatin C表达水平以及二者相关性和与肺癌临床病理、预后关系。

材料与方法

研究对象

选择2007年3月-9月西安交大二附院84例肺癌患者,其中男性50例,女性34例,年龄41岁-78岁,中位年龄61.5岁;鳞癌30例,腺癌40例,小细胞肺癌(small cell lung cancer, SCLC) 14例。临床分期(TNM分期),Ⅰ期+Ⅱ期28例,Ⅲ期+Ⅳ期56例。所有患者均经过组织学或病理学检查确诊为肺癌,采血前均未行手术、放化疗以及中成药等其它抗肿瘤治疗。另外,选取健康查体者36例作为对照组,男性20例,女性16例;年龄40岁-79岁,中位年龄60.4岁。本研究得到西安交大二附院伦理委员会许可,患者均签署知情同意书。

标本采集

所有肺癌患者和健康体检者分别抽取晨间空腹静脉血3 mL,抽取后1 h内,4 ℃,3, 000 g离心10 min,分离的血清-80 ℃冻存待检。

检测方法

Cat Xcystatin C水平均采用酶联免疫吸附法测定。严格按照ELISA检测试剂盒(上海郎卡公司)的说明书操作,标准品孔各加不同浓度的标准品50 μL;然后样本孔先加待测样本10 μL,再加样本稀释液40 μL;后分别加入辣根过氧化物酶(HRP)标记的检测抗体100 μL,封板膜封孔,37 ℃恒温箱温育60 min。手工洗板法清洗,每孔加入底物A、B各50 μL,37 ℃避光孵育15 min,后每孔加入终止液50 μL,15 min内,在450 nm波长处测定各孔的OD值。实验重复3次。

随访

84例患者术后均进行了随访,总生存期OS定义为首次确诊至患者死亡时间或末次随访时间。死于非肺癌相关原因的患者排除在本研究外。随访最长时间为60个月。

统计学处理

数据采用SPSS 16.0软件进行统计分析。每组数据均采用Mean±SD表示。组间差异采取Mann-Whitney和Kruskal-Wallis检验。Pearson's相关系数评价Cat Xcystatin C之间的相关性。Kaplan-Meier法(组间生存率比较采用Log-rank检验)及Cox单因素以及多因素风险回归模型进行生存分析。双侧P < 0.05为差异有统计学意义。

结果

肺癌患者和健康人Cat X和cystatin C表达水平比较

肺癌患者及健康人血清Cat X水平分别为(2.24±0.07) ng/mL、(1.85±0.09) ng/mL;cystatin C分别为(529.77 ±6.15) ng/mL、(476.76±13.95) ng/mL。肺癌患者血清Cat Xcystatin C水平明显高于健康人(P < 0.01)。此外,肺癌患者cystatin C/Cat X比值与健康人相比,差异无统计学意义(P=0.372)。Pearson相关分析显示,肺癌患者血清Cat Xcystatin C水平无明显相关性(r=-0.049, P=0.66)。

肺癌患者Cat X和cystatin C表达水平与临床病理特征的关系

Cat Xcystatin C/Cat X与肺癌患者性别、年龄、病理类型、淋巴结转移、细胞分化及TNM分期无明显相关,但Cat X与病理类型有相关趋势(P=0.076),cystatin C/Cat X与淋巴结转移有相关趋势(P=0.058)。cystatin C水平与肺癌分期相关,Ⅲ期+Ⅳ期肺癌患者cystatin C水平明显高于Ⅰ期+Ⅱ期(P=0.01),与其它临床病理特征无关(表 1)。
1

肺癌患者血清Cat X和cystatin C表达水平与临床病理特征的关系

Relationship of Cat X and cystatin C in the sera of patients with lung cancer on the clinicopathological parameters

CharacteristicnCat XCystatin CCystatin C/Cat X
Mean±SDPMean±SDPMean±SDP
Cat X: Cathepsin X; Cats, Cathepsins; SCC: squamous cell carcinoma; ADC: adenocarcinoma; SCLC: small cell lung cancer.
GenderMale502.34±0.9410.222531.73±8.330.483245.30±10.800.196
Female342.08±0.108526.88±9.10276.33±14.75
Age (yr)≥61.5422.13±0.0990.137526.61±10.020.308267.77±12.780.137
< 61.6422.34±0.103532.92 ±7.22247.95±12.29
Pathological typeSCC302.34± 0.1250.076537.14±9.530.575251.45±15.420.076
ADC402.05 ±0.774527.99±9.47273.21±11.97
SCLC142.56 ±0.233519.05±15.03227.69±22.92
Lymph node metastasisYes502.16±0.9020.279537.37±8.330.126269.33±10.830.058
No342.38±0.117516.09±8.03237.21±14.94
GradeG1+G2422.23±0.100.694536.54±8.800.376259.65±12.160.741
G3422.24±0.105523.00±8.46256.08±13.08
StageⅠ+Ⅱ282.22±0.1480.232507.99±8.940.01258.23±17.720.992
Ⅲ+Ⅳ562.25± 0.08540.66±7.71257.68±10.07
肺癌患者血清Cat Xcystatin C表达水平与临床病理特征的关系 Relationship of Cat X and cystatin C in the sera of patients with lung cancer on the clinicopathological parameters

肺癌患者Cat X和cystatin C水平与预后的关系

Kaplan-Meier生存分析

将患者性别、淋巴结状态、分化程度、分期分组,以及根据年龄、Cat Xcystatin Ccystatin C/Cat X的中位数以二分法的方式分 < 中位数组以及≥中位数组,进行Kaplan-Meier生存分析,生存差异的统计学意义用Log-rank法判定。结果示低Cat X和高Cat X患者中位OS分别为22.9个月和15.8个月,差异有统计学意义(P=0.019, RR=1.678),低Cat X患者和高Cat X患者相比OS更长(图 1)。Ⅰ期+Ⅱ期和Ⅲ期+Ⅳ期肺癌患者中位OS分别为23.8个月和15.4个月,差异有统计学意义(P=0.011, RR=1.827),晚期肺癌患者预后更差(图 2)。高、低cystatin C/Cat X值患者中位OS分别为23.5个月和18.5个月,差异无统计学意义,但有一定的差异趋势(P=0.069)。性别、年龄、淋巴结状态、分化程度以及cystatin C对肺癌患者OS无明显影响(表 2)。
1

血清Cat X高表达组和低表达组肺癌患者Kaplan-Meier生存曲线

Kaplan-Meier survival curves of lung cancer patients with low or high levels of Cat X in sera

2

TNM Ⅰ+Ⅱ组和Ⅲ+Ⅳ组肺癌患者生存曲线

Kaplan-Meier survival curves of lung cancer patients with TNM stage Ⅰ+Ⅱ or stage Ⅲ+Ⅳ

2

单因素和多因素分析肺癌Cat X、cystatin C及其它因素与预后的情况

Univariate and multivariate analysis of Cat X, cystatin C, and other potential factors for prognosis in patients with lung cancer

CharacteristicnOverall survival (month)Univariate analysisMultivariate analysis
PRRPRR
Cat X< 2.304422.90.0191.6780.7681.131
≥2.303015.8
Cystatin C< 523.184522.60.1051.4360.1520.89
≥523.183917.3
Cystatin C/Cat X< 233.004218.50.0690.6650.5820.783
≥233.004223.5
GenderMale5017.30.1030.6880.3580.789
Female3422.3
Age (yr)< 61.54221.10.1771.3570.3761.26
≥61.54217.9
Pathological typeSCC3017.60.6381.0780.1931.25
ADC4020.5
SCLC1417.9
Lymph node metastasisYes5418.20.4090.8270.9941.002
No3020.3
GradeG1+G24220.60.3451.2320.0721.634
G34216.8
StageⅠ+Ⅱ2823.80.0111.8270.0092.25
Ⅲ+Ⅳ5615.4
血清Cat X高表达组和低表达组肺癌患者Kaplan-Meier生存曲线 Kaplan-Meier survival curves of lung cancer patients with low or high levels of Cat X in sera TNM Ⅰ+Ⅱ组和Ⅲ+Ⅳ组肺癌患者生存曲线 Kaplan-Meier survival curves of lung cancer patients with TNM stage Ⅰ+Ⅱ or stage Ⅲ+Ⅳ 单因素和多因素分析肺癌Cat Xcystatin C及其它因素与预后的情况 Univariate and multivariate analysis of Cat X, cystatin C, and other potential factors for prognosis in patients with lung cancer

Cox比例风险回归模型分析

采取单因素及多因素Cox回归法分析影响肺癌患者预后的独立危险因素。利用Cox单因素回归分析发现Cat x高表达以及tnm分期是影响肺癌预后独立因素,继续将各个变量引入Cox多因素回归模型,结果显示,仅有TNM分期是患者预后的独立危险因素(表 2)。

讨论

肺癌是目前发病率高的恶性肿瘤之一,大部分发现时已经是中晚期,失去了手术机会,患者生存期短,5年生存率约15%[。因此肺癌的早诊断、早治疗至关重要。血清肿瘤标记物具有取材方便、方法易行等独特优势,在肺癌早期诊断、预后判断中有重要价值,因此人们一直在寻找有价值的血清肿瘤标记物。 Cat X是近年来发现一种新的Cats,通常以酶原形式存在于免疫细胞的溶酶体内,受到激活后,转化为有活性的酶释放到血液和细胞外基质中[。Cat X在恶性肿瘤患者血清和细胞外基质中也有表达,Vizin等[研究了Cat X在结肠癌、腺瘤、其它结肠良性病变以及健康者血清中的表达情况,虽未发现Cat X在4组中表达有差异,但Cat X水平高的结肠癌患者OS更短。Decock等[比较了早期乳癌和炎性乳癌中血清Cat X水平,发现炎性乳癌患者中血清Cat X中水平低,有可能为炎性乳癌的诊断提供一定的参考价值。本研究检测了肺癌患者和健康人血清Cat X水平,结果提示肺癌患者Cat X水平明显高于健康人,提示Cat X可能与肺癌发生有关,有希望作为肺癌的肿瘤标记物。 Cystatin CCats抑制剂,可能会减轻Cats在肿瘤侵袭、转移过程中作用[。Nishikawa等[用ELISA法检测良、恶性卵巢瘤患者和健康人的血清cystatin C,发现卵巢癌患者血清cystatin C水平明显高于良性肿瘤及健康人。Saleh等[也发现在结直肠癌组织中cystatin C高表达,特别是在腺癌中达到100%。然而也有研究[表明在肺鳞癌和正常肺组织中表达无明显差异。Wegiel等[则发现前列腺癌中cystatin C表达减低。我们检测了肺癌患者和健康人血清cystatin C水平,结果示肺癌患者血清cystatin C水平明显高于健康人。究其原因可能是肺癌患者中Cats升高,cystatin C为了抑制其活性也随之升高,但是仍然无法有效抑制蛋白水解酶的活性,导致肿瘤发生。 Cystatin CCats之间的失衡可能与肿瘤发生有关。Zore等[发现结肠癌患者血清Cat B的含量增加,cystatin C也随之增加,但Cat B的活性并未被相应增加的cystatin C抑制,提示随着肿瘤的进展,两者改变的同时伴随Cat B和cystatin C之间的失平衡。故有人把cystatin CCats的比值作为诊断肿瘤恶性程度的指标。本研究提示肺癌患者cystatin C/Cat X比值与健康人相比,无统计学差异,未见到cystatin CCat X失衡与肺癌相关。我们研究发现肺癌患者血清cystatin CCat X之间无相关性。Chen等[报道cystatin CCat B、Cat L之间无明显相关。原因可能是由于cystatin C并不是Cats唯一的抑制剂,其它抑制剂如stefn A也可能涉及到Cats的抑制。 本研究显示,Cat X与肺癌患者性别、年龄、病理类型、淋巴结转移、细胞分化及TNM分期之间无明显相关。Sevenich等[研究提示,在基因敲除的乳腺癌小鼠模型中,Cat X在肿瘤发展的初期表达增高,而在进展期及转移瘤中表达降低。此外Hidaka等[研究结果提示20q13.2扩增与结肠癌进展和转移有关。Wang等[研究也发现Cat X与晚期肝癌有关。而Lines等[报道了相反的结论,提示Cat X降低了细胞粘附,并减少胰腺癌转移。这些不同研究结果可能由于样本量偏小、检测方法以及检测标本不同或Cat X在不同肿瘤中表达不同所致。 本研究显示,cystatin C与肺癌分期有关,但是与其它临床特征之间无明显相关。Vigneswaran等[研究发现cystatin C与乳腺癌淋巴结转移无关,但与肿瘤大小有关。Saleh等[研究发现cystatin C在晚期结肠癌中表达高于早期结肠癌。本研究与上述研究一致,提示cystatin C升高可能与肿瘤浸润、转移有关。 本研究未发现cystatin C/Cat X比值与肺癌临床病理特征相关。Kolwijck等[报道cystatin C/Cat H和cystatin C/ Cat X比值与卵巢癌病理类型相关,在低分化癌中明显升高。cystatin CCat X失衡与肿瘤研究甚少,还需要进一步扩大样本量或在其它肿瘤上进一步研究。 本研究表明,Cat X低水平肺癌患者同高水平患者相比有更好的OS。Vizin等[报道了血清Cat X高水平的结肠癌患者OS更短,与结肠癌预后有关。本研究与Vizin等[研究一致,提示Cat X有希望作为判断肺癌预后的指标。 我们研究提示,血清cystatin C高水平的肺癌患者OS短于低水平者(22.6个月vs 13.7个月),但差异无统计学意义(P=0.105)。Strojan等[研究报道cystatin C与头颈部肿瘤预后有关,cystatin C低表达的患者无病生存期更长。Kos等[研究了黑色素瘤患者中cystatin C与预后关系,未发现两者之间存在相关性。 我们用单因素Cox回归分析发现Cat X水平以及TNM分期是影响肺癌预后独立因素,Cat X高水平以及晚期肺癌患者预后更差。多因素回归分析表明分期是影响肺癌患者生存的独立危险因素,晚期患者预后更差、OS更短,死亡的风险是早期的2.250倍。我们的结果进一步佐证了晚期肺癌预后更差。 总之,我们的研究初步证明在肺癌患者中血清Cat Xcystatin C水平升高,可能与肺癌的发生、发展有关。cystatin C在晚期肺癌中表达增高,可能与肺癌转移、侵袭相关。Cat X高水平的患者OS更短,单因素Cox回归分析显示Cat X是影响肺癌患者预后的独立因素。但本研究样本量还不大,需要扩大样本量进一步研究Cat X等因子与肺癌临床特征及预后的关系。
  32 in total

1.  Human cathepsin X: A cysteine protease with unique carboxypeptidase activity.

Authors:  D K Nägler; R Zhang; W Tam; T Sulea; E O Purisima; R Ménard
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1999-09-28       Impact factor: 3.162

2.  Expression analysis of cystatin C and M in laser-capture microdissectioned human breast cancer cells--a preliminary study.

Authors:  Nadarajah Vigneswaran; Jean Wu; Susan Muller; Wolfgang Zacharias; Sena Narendran; Lavinia Middleton
Journal:  Pathol Res Pract       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.250

3.  Carboxypeptidases cathepsins X and B display distinct protein profile in human cells and tissues.

Authors:  Janko Kos; Andreja Sekirnik; Ales Premzl; Valentina Zavasnik Bergant; Tomaz Langerholc; Boris Turk; Bernd Werle; Rastko Golouh; Urska Repnik; Matjaz Jeras; Vito Turk
Journal:  Exp Cell Res       Date:  2005-05-15       Impact factor: 3.905

4.  Synergistic antitumor effects of combined cathepsin B and cathepsin Z deficiencies on breast cancer progression and metastasis in mice.

Authors:  Lisa Sevenich; Uta Schurigt; Kathrin Sachse; Mieczyslaw Gajda; Fee Werner; Sebastian Müller; Olga Vasiljeva; Anne Schwinde; Nicole Klemm; Jan Deussing; Christoph Peters; Thomas Reinheckel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-01-21       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Detection of cathepsin B, cathepsin L, cystatin C, urokinase plasminogen activator and urokinase plasminogen activator receptor in the sera of lung cancer patients.

Authors:  Qingyong Chen; Jun Fei; Lijun Wu; Zhongyong Jiang; Yuquan Wu; Yun Zheng; Guohua Lu
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2011-05-11       Impact factor: 2.967

Review 6.  The role of cathepsin X in cell signaling.

Authors:  Janko Kos; Zala Jevnikar; Natasa Obermajer
Journal:  Cell Adh Migr       Date:  2009-04-13       Impact factor: 3.405

7.  CD133/prominin1 is prognostic for GBM patient's survival, but inversely correlated with cysteine cathepsins' expression in glioblastoma derived spheroids.

Authors:  Seyed Y Ardebili; Irena Zajc; Boris Gole; Benito Campos; Christel Herold-Mende; Sara Drmota; Tamara T Lah
Journal:  Radiol Oncol       Date:  2011-06-03       Impact factor: 2.991

Review 8.  Cysteine proteinases and their inhibitors in extracellular fluids: markers for diagnosis and prognosis in cancer.

Authors:  J Kos; B Werle; T Lah; N Brunner
Journal:  Int J Biol Markers       Date:  2000 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 3.248

9.  Overexpression of cathepsin Z contributes to tumor metastasis by inducing epithelial-mesenchymal transition in hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Jian Wang; Leilei Chen; Yan Li; Xin-Yuan Guan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Cathepsin B, cathepsin H, cathepsin X and cystatin C in sera of patients with early-stage and inflammatory breast cancer.

Authors:  J Decock; N Obermajer; S Vozelj; W Hendrickx; R Paridaens; J Kos
Journal:  Int J Biol Markers       Date:  2008 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 3.248

View more
  5 in total

1.  Correlation analysis of serum cystatin C, uric acid and lactate dehydrogenase levels before chemotherapy on the prognosis of small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Haocheng Wang; Dongfeng Shan; Ya Dong; Xue Yang; Linwei Zhang; Zhuang Yu
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2020-11-25       Impact factor: 2.967

2.  Decreased levels of cathepsin Z mRNA expressed by immune blood cells: diagnostic and prognostic implications in prostate cancer.

Authors:  A A S Batista; B M Franco; M M Perez; E G Pereira; T Rodrigues; M L Wroclawski; F L A Fonseca; E R Suarez
Journal:  Braz J Med Biol Res       Date:  2021-08-06       Impact factor: 2.590

3.  Evaluation of novel cathepsin-X inhibitors in vitro and in vivo and their ability to improve cathepsin-B-directed antitumor therapy.

Authors:  Ana Mitrović; Janja Završnik; Georgy Mikhaylov; Damijan Knez; Urša Pečar Fonović; Petra Matjan Štefin; Miha Butinar; Stanislav Gobec; Boris Turk; Janko Kos
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 9.261

4.  Prognostic and predictive value of cathepsin X in serum from colorectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Tjaša Vižin; Ib Jarle Christensen; Michael Wilhelmsen; Hans Jørgen Nielsen; Janko Kos
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2014-04-13       Impact factor: 4.430

5.  Utility of cystatin C as a potential bladder tumour biomarker confirmed by surface plasmon resonance technique.

Authors:  Anna Tokarzewicz; Tomasz Guszcz; Anna Onopiuk; Robert Kozlowski; Ewa Gorodkiewicz
Journal:  Indian J Med Res       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 2.375

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.