Literature DB >> 23945085

Domestic food preparation practices: a review of the reasons for poor home hygiene practices.

Ali Al-Sakkaf1.   

Abstract

New Zealand has a much higher rate of reported campylobacteriosis cases than the rest of the developed world. It has been suggested that New Zealanders have worse home hygiene practices during food preparation than the citizens of other developed countries. Thus, it is necessary to recognize and understand the reasons for consumer's poor practices in order to help develop a more effective message to improve New Zealanders' practices in the domestic environment. This could in turn lead to a reduction in the number of campylobacteriosis cases. The objective is to review cited literature on consumer practices which is related to food poisoning and to attempt to list the factors related to poor consumer practice. There are many internationally identifiable reasons for the poor practices of consumers. These reasons include psychological, demographic and socioeconomic variables; personal interest in new information; prior knowledge; cultural influence; educational background; perception of risk, control and liability; and attitude towards the addressed practices or hazards. The results have indicated that 'optimistic bias', the 'illusion of control', habits and lack of knowledge concerning food safety during domestic food preparation are prevalent among consumers. The research indicated the influence of demographic factors (age, gender, level of education, income, work hours, race, location, culture), as they play a potential role in determining domestic food safety behaviour. It appears that all these factors are applicable for New Zealand consumers and should be addressed in any future education strategy aimed at improving New Zealanders' food handling practices.
© The Author (2013). Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Consumer poor practice; demographic and socio-economic factors; food preparation; optimistic bias

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23945085     DOI: 10.1093/heapro/dat051

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Promot Int        ISSN: 0957-4824            Impact factor:   2.483


  5 in total

1.  Home Food Safety Practice and Household Food Insecurity: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach.

Authors:  Fatemeh Esfarjani; Hedayat Hosseini; Ramin Khaksar; Roshanak Roustaee; Haleh Alikhanian; Marjan Khalafi; Amin Mousavi Khaneghah; Fatemeh Mohammadi-Nasrabadi
Journal:  Iran J Public Health       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 1.429

2.  Kitchen layouts and consumers' food hygiene practices: Ergonomics versus safety.

Authors:  Octavian Augustin Mihalache; Trond Møretrø; Daniela Borda; Loredana Dumitraşcu; Corina Neagu; Christophe Nguyen-The; Isabelle Maître; Pierrine Didier; Paula Teixeira; Luis Orlando Lopes Junqueira; Monica Truninger; Tekla Izsó; Gyula Kasza; Silje Elisabeth Skuland; Solveig Langsrud; Anca Ioana Nicolau
Journal:  Food Control       Date:  2022-01       Impact factor: 5.548

3.  Food Safety Attitude and Associated Factors Among Mothers of Under 5 Children, Debarq Town: Community-Based Cross-Sectional Study, 2019.

Authors:  Henok Dagne; Jember Azanaw; Tesfaye Hagos; Kidstemariam Addis
Journal:  Environ Health Insights       Date:  2021-11-19

Review 4.  On how people deal with industrialized and non-industrialized food: A theoretical analysis.

Authors:  Alessandra Amorim; João Borges Laurindo; Paulo José do Amaral Sobral
Journal:  Front Nutr       Date:  2022-09-02

5.  Challenges and Opportunities towards the Development of Risk Assessment at the Consumer Phase in Developing Countries-The Case of Campylobacter Cross-Contamination during Handling of Raw Chicken in Two Middle Eastern Countries.

Authors:  Ihab Habib; Ali Harb; Ingrid Hansson; Ivar Vågsholm; Walaa Osama; Salma Adnan; Mohamed Anwar; Neveen Agamy; Sofia Boqvist
Journal:  Pathogens       Date:  2020-01-16
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.