Literature DB >> 23945084

Effect of a 2-week joint mobilization intervention on single-limb balance and ankle arthrokinematics in those with chronic ankle instability.

Matthew C Hoch1, David R Mullineaux, Richard D Andreatta, Robert A English, Jennifer M Medina-McKeon, Carl G Mattacola, Patrick O McKeon.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: A single talocrural joint-mobilization treatment has improved spatiotemporal measures of postural control but not ankle arthrokinematics in individuals with chronic ankle instability (CAI). However, the effects of multiple treatment sessions on these aspects of function have not been investigated.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of a 2-wk anterior-to-posterior joint-mobilization intervention on instrumented measures of single-limb-stance static postural control and ankle arthrokinematics in adults with CAI.
DESIGN: Repeated measures.
SETTING: Research laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: 12 individuals with CAI (6 male, 6 female; age 27.4 ± 4.3 y, height 175.4 ± 9.78 cm, mass 78.4 ± 11.0 kg). INTERVENTION: Subjects received 6 treatments sessions of talocrural grade II joint traction and grade III anterior-to-posterior joint mobilization over 2 wk. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Instrumented measures of single-limb-stance static postural control (eyes open and closed) and anterior and posterior talar displacement and stiffness were assessed 1 wk before the intervention (baseline), before the first treatment (preintervention), 24-48 h after the final treatment (postintervention), and 1 wk later (1-wk follow-up). Postural control was analyzed as center-of-pressure velocity, center-of-pressure range, the mean of time-to-boundary minima, and standard deviation of time-to-boundary minima in the anteroposterior and mediolateral directions for each visual condition.
RESULTS: No significant differences were identified in any measures of postural control (P > .08) or ankle arthrokinematics (P > .21).
CONCLUSIONS: The 2-wk talocrural joint-mobilization intervention did not alter instrumented measures of single-limb-stance postural control or ankle arthrokinematics. Despite the absence of change in these measures, this study continues to clarify the role of talocrural joint mobilization as a rehabilitation strategy for patients with CAI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23945084     DOI: 10.1123/jsr.2012-0125

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sport Rehabil        ISSN: 1056-6716            Impact factor:   1.931


  4 in total

1.  A 4-Week Multimodal Intervention for Individuals With Chronic Ankle Instability: Examination of Disease-Oriented and Patient-Oriented Outcomes.

Authors:  Cameron J Powden; Johanna M Hoch; Beth E Jamali; Matthew C Hoch
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2018-12-27       Impact factor: 2.860

2.  Predicting balance improvements following STARS treatments in chronic ankle instability participants.

Authors:  Erik A Wikstrom; Patrick O McKeon
Journal:  J Sci Med Sport       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 4.319

3.  Acute Effects of Increased Joint Mobilization Treatment Duration on Ankle Function and Dynamic Postural Control in Female Athletes With Chronic Ankle Instability.

Authors:  Christopher J Holland; Jonathan D Hughes; Mark B A De Ste Croix
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2020-06-22

4.  Experiences of foot and ankle mobilisations combined with home stretches in people with diabetes: a qualitative study embedded in a proof-of-concept randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Vasileios Lepesis; Jonathan Marsden; Joanne Paton; Alec Rickard; Jos M Latour
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2022-01-29       Impact factor: 2.303

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.