Literature DB >> 23944915

Force control and its relation to timing.

S W Keele1, R I Ivry, R A Pokorny.   

Abstract

Previous work (Keele & Hawkins, 1982; Keele, Pokorny, Corcos, & Ivry, 1985) has suggested two general factors of coordination that differentiate people across a variety of motor movements, factors of timing and maximum rate of successive movements. This study provides comparable evidence for a third general factor of coordination, that of force control. Subjects who exhibit low variability in reproducing a target force with one effector, the finger, tend to show low variability with two other effectors, the foot and forearm. In addition, ability in force control cuts across different force ranges and across situations where force control is either the primary goal or the secondary goal. Force records obtained during a periodic tapping task show that, although force control is largely independent of timing, there are some interactions between the two factors. Force variation appears to distort timing a small amount in part because larger forces speed up implementation of movement, thereby shortening preceding intervals and lengthening following ones, and in part because force variation alters central-timing mechanisms.

Entities:  

Year:  1987        PMID: 23944915     DOI: 10.1080/00222895.1987.10735402

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mot Behav        ISSN: 0022-2895            Impact factor:   1.328


  11 in total

1.  Individual differences in timing of discrete and continuous movements: a dimensional approach.

Authors:  H Lorås; A K Stensdotter; F Öhberg; H Sigmundsson
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2013-05-28

2.  Cooperative selection of movements: the optimal selection model.

Authors:  J Vaughan; D A Rosenbaum; F J Diedrich; C M Moore
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  1996

3.  Timing at peak force may be the hidden target controlled in continuation and synchronization tapping.

Authors:  Yue Du; Jane E Clark; Jill Whitall
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-03-02       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Individual differences in implicit motor learning: task specificity in sensorimotor adaptation and sequence learning.

Authors:  Alit Stark-Inbar; Meher Raza; Jordan A Taylor; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-11-02       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Corrective jitter motion shows similar individual frequencies for the arm and the finger.

Authors:  Lior Noy; Uri Alon; Jason Friedman
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Continuation tapping to triggered melodies: motor resonance effects of melodic motion.

Authors:  Paolo Ammirante; William F Thompson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-10-25       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  The timing effect of accent production in synchronization and continuation tasks performed by musicians and nonmusicians.

Authors:  M Billon; A Semjen
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  1995

8.  The effects of Parkinson's disease and age on syncopated finger movements.

Authors:  Elizabeth L Stegemöller; Tanya Simuni; Colum D Mackinnon
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2009-07-09       Impact factor: 3.252

9.  Effect of movement frequency on repetitive finger movements in patients with Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Elizabeth L Stegemöller; Tanya Simuni; Colum MacKinnon
Journal:  Mov Disord       Date:  2009-06-15       Impact factor: 10.338

Review 10.  Physical and neural entrainment to rhythm: human sensorimotor coordination across tasks and effector systems.

Authors:  Jessica Marie Ross; Ramesh Balasubramaniam
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.