PURPOSE: To examine the relevance of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) to CBR monitoring and evaluation by investigating the relationship between the ICF and information in published CBR monitoring and evaluation reports. METHOD: A three-stage literature search and analysis method was employed. Studies were identified via online database searches for peer-reviewed journal articles, and hand-searching of CBR network resources, NGO websites and specific journals. From each study "information items" were extracted; extraction consistency among authors was established. Finally, the resulting information items were coded to ICF domains and categories, with consensus on coding being achieved. RESULTS: Thirty-six articles relating to monitoring and evaluating CBR were selected for analysis. Approximately one third of the 2495 information items identified in these articles (788 or 32%) related to concepts of functioning, disability and environment, and could be coded to the ICF. These information items were spread across the entire ICF classification with a concentration on Activities and Participation (49% of the 788 information items) and Environmental Factors (42%). CONCLUSIONS: The ICF is a relevant and potentially useful framework and classification, providing building blocks for the systematic recording of information pertaining to functioning and disability, for CBR monitoring and evaluation. Implications for Rehabilitation The application of the ICF, as one of the building blocks for CBR monitoring and evaluation, is a constructive step towards an evidence-base on the efficacy and outcomes of CBR programs. The ICF can be used to provide the infrastructure for functioning and disability information to inform service practitioners and enable national and international comparisons.
PURPOSE: To examine the relevance of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) to CBR monitoring and evaluation by investigating the relationship between the ICF and information in published CBR monitoring and evaluation reports. METHOD: A three-stage literature search and analysis method was employed. Studies were identified via online database searches for peer-reviewed journal articles, and hand-searching of CBR network resources, NGO websites and specific journals. From each study "information items" were extracted; extraction consistency among authors was established. Finally, the resulting information items were coded to ICF domains and categories, with consensus on coding being achieved. RESULTS: Thirty-six articles relating to monitoring and evaluating CBR were selected for analysis. Approximately one third of the 2495 information items identified in these articles (788 or 32%) related to concepts of functioning, disability and environment, and could be coded to the ICF. These information items were spread across the entire ICF classification with a concentration on Activities and Participation (49% of the 788 information items) and Environmental Factors (42%). CONCLUSIONS: The ICF is a relevant and potentially useful framework and classification, providing building blocks for the systematic recording of information pertaining to functioning and disability, for CBR monitoring and evaluation. Implications for Rehabilitation The application of the ICF, as one of the building blocks for CBR monitoring and evaluation, is a constructive step towards an evidence-base on the efficacy and outcomes of CBR programs. The ICF can be used to provide the infrastructure for functioning and disability information to inform service practitioners and enable national and international comparisons.
Keywords:
Community-based rehabilitation; Disability and Health (ICF); International Classification of Functioning; environmental factors; participation
Authors: Surya P Bhatt; Siddharth B Patel; Erica M Anderson; Daniel Baugh; Tina Givens; Christopher Schumann; J Gregory Sanders; Samuel T Windham; Gary R Cutter; Mark T Dransfield Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2019-08-15 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Brian W Waldersen; Jennifer L Wolff; Laken Roberts; Allysin E Bridges; Laura N Gitlin; Sarah L Szanton Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2016-12-19 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: Taina Ala-Nikkola; Sami Pirkola; Minna Kaila; Grigori Joffe; Raija Kontio; Olli Oranta; Minna Sadeniemi; Kristian Wahlbeck; Samuli I Saarni Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2018-05-31 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Thomas Maribo; Kirsten S Petersen; Charlotte Handberg; Hanne Melchiorsen; Anne-Mette H Momsen; Claus V Nielsen; Matilde Leonardi; Merete Labriola Journal: J Clin Med Res Date: 2015-12-03
Authors: Manuel José Lopes; Lara Guedes de Pinho; César Fonseca; Margarida Goes; Henrique Oliveira; José Garcia-Alonso; Anabela Afonso Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-06-30 Impact factor: 3.390