BACKGROUND: Traditional risk factors, particularly obesity, do not completely explain the excess risk of diabetes among African Americans compared to whites. OBJECTIVE: We sought to quantify the impact of recently identified, non-traditional risk factors on the racial disparity in diabetes risk. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: We analyzed data from 2,322 African-American and 8,840 white participants without diabetes at baseline from the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study. MAIN MEASURES: We used Cox regression to quantify the association of incident diabetes by race over 9 years of in-person and 17 years of telephone follow-up, adjusting for traditional and non-traditional risk factors based on literature search. We calculated the mediation effect of a covariate as the percent change in the coefficient of race in multivariate models without and with the covariate of interest; 95 % confidence intervals (95 % CI) were calculated using boot-strapping. KEY RESULTS: African American race was independently associated with incident diabetes. Body mass index (BMI), forced vital capacity (FVC), systolic blood pressure, and serum potassium had the greatest explanatory effects for the difference in diabetes risk between races, with mediation effects (95 % CI) of 22.0 % (11.7 %, 42.2 %), 21.7 %(9.5 %, 43.1 %), 17.9 % (10.2 %, 37.4 %) and 17.7 % (8.2 %, 39.4 %), respectively, during 9 years of in-person follow-up, with continued effect over 17 years of telephone follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Non-traditional risk factors, particularly FVC and serum potassium, are potential mediators of the association between race and diabetes risk. They should be studied further to verify their importance and to determine if they mark causal relationships that can be addressed to reduce the racial disparity in diabetes risk.
BACKGROUND: Traditional risk factors, particularly obesity, do not completely explain the excess risk of diabetes among African Americans compared to whites. OBJECTIVE: We sought to quantify the impact of recently identified, non-traditional risk factors on the racial disparity in diabetes risk. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: We analyzed data from 2,322 African-American and 8,840 white participants without diabetes at baseline from the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study. MAIN MEASURES: We used Cox regression to quantify the association of incident diabetes by race over 9 years of in-person and 17 years of telephone follow-up, adjusting for traditional and non-traditional risk factors based on literature search. We calculated the mediation effect of a covariate as the percent change in the coefficient of race in multivariate models without and with the covariate of interest; 95 % confidence intervals (95 % CI) were calculated using boot-strapping. KEY RESULTS: African American race was independently associated with incident diabetes. Body mass index (BMI), forced vital capacity (FVC), systolic blood pressure, and serum potassium had the greatest explanatory effects for the difference in diabetes risk between races, with mediation effects (95 % CI) of 22.0 % (11.7 %, 42.2 %), 21.7 %(9.5 %, 43.1 %), 17.9 % (10.2 %, 37.4 %) and 17.7 % (8.2 %, 39.4 %), respectively, during 9 years of in-person follow-up, with continued effect over 17 years of telephone follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Non-traditional risk factors, particularly FVC and serum potassium, are potential mediators of the association between race and diabetes risk. They should be studied further to verify their importance and to determine if they mark causal relationships that can be addressed to reduce the racial disparity in diabetes risk.
Authors: Barbora Vozarova; Christian Weyer; Robert S Lindsay; Richard E Pratley; Clifton Bogardus; P Antonio Tataranni Journal: Diabetes Date: 2002-02 Impact factor: 9.461
Authors: Qing He; Moonseong Heo; Stanley Heshka; Jack Wang; Richard N Pierson; Jeanine Albu; Zimian Wang; Steven B Heymsfield; Dympna Gallagher Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2003-07 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Bruce B Duncan; Maria Inês Schmidt; James S Pankow; Christie M Ballantyne; David Couper; Alvaro Vigo; Ron Hoogeveen; Aaron R Folsom; Gerardo Heiss Journal: Diabetes Date: 2003-07 Impact factor: 9.461
Authors: L A Raynor; James S Pankow; Bruce B Duncan; Maria I Schmidt; Ron C Hoogeveen; Mark A Pereira; J Hunter Young; Christie M Ballantyne Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2012-08-28 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Erin R Kulick; Yeseon P Moon; Ken Cheung; Joshua Z Willey; Ralph L Sacco; Mitchell S V Elkind Journal: Prev Med Date: 2015-12-04 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: Ranee Chatterjee; Clemontina A Davenport; Laura P Svetkey; Bryan C Batch; Pao-Hwa Lin; Vasan S Ramachandran; Ervin R Fox; Jane Harman; Hsin-Chieh Yeh; Elizabeth Selvin; Adolfo Correa; Kenneth Butler; David Edelman Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2016-12-14 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Michael P Bancks; Kiarri Kershaw; April P Carson; Penny Gordon-Larsen; Pamela J Schreiner; Mercedes R Carnethon Journal: JAMA Date: 2017-12-26 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Keisha L Bentley-Edwards; Loneke T Blackman Carr; Paul A Robbins; Eugenia Conde; Khaing Zaw; William A Darity Journal: J Relig Health Date: 2020-12
Authors: Thomas E Fuller-Rowell; Lydia K Homandberg; David S Curtis; Vera K Tsenkova; David R Williams; Carol D Ryff Journal: Psychoneuroendocrinology Date: 2019-04-29 Impact factor: 4.905