Literature DB >> 23943217

Cost-effectiveness of surgical decompression for space-occupying hemispheric infarction.

Jeannette Hofmeijer1, H Bart van der Worp, L Jaap Kappelle, Sara Eshuis, Ale Algra, Jacoba P Greving.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Surgical decompression reduces mortality and increases the probability of a favorable functional outcome after space-occupying hemispheric infarction. Its cost-effectiveness is uncertain.
METHODS: We assessed clinical outcomes, costs, and cost-effectiveness for the first 3 years in patients who were randomized to surgical decompression or best medical treatment within 48 hours after symptom onset in the Hemicraniectomy After Middle Cerebral Artery Infarction With Life-Threatening Edema Trial (HAMLET). Data on medical consumption were derived from case record files, hospital charts, and general practitioners. We calculated costs per quality-adjusted life year (QALY). Uncertainty was assessed with bootstrapping. A Markov model was constructed to estimate costs and health outcomes after 3 years.
RESULTS: Of 39 patients enrolled within 48 hours, 21 were randomized to surgical decompression. After 3 years, 5 surgical (24%) and 14 medical patients (78%) had died. In the first 3 years after enrollment, operated patients had more QALYs than medically treated patients (mean difference, 1.0 QALY [95% confidence interval, 0.6-1.4]), but at higher costs (mean difference, €127,000 [95% confidence interval, 73,100-181,000]), indicating incremental costs of €127,000 per QALY gained. Ninety-eight percent of incremental cost-effectiveness ratios replicated by bootstrapping were >€80,000 per QALY gained. Markov modeling suggested costs of ≈€60,000 per QALY gained for a patient's lifetime.
CONCLUSIONS: Surgical decompression for space-occupying infarction results in an increase in QALYs, but at very high costs. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION URL: http://www.controlled-trials.com. Unique identifier: ISRCTN94237756.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cost-effectiveness analysis; decompression, surgical; hemicraniectomy; malignant infarction; space-occupying infarction

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23943217     DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.002445

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stroke        ISSN: 0039-2499            Impact factor:   7.914


  5 in total

1.  Cost-effectiveness of transfers to centers with neurological intensive care units after intracerebral hemorrhage.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Fletcher; Vikas Kotagal; Aaron Mammoser; Mark Peterson; Lewis B Morgenstern; James F Burke
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 7.914

Review 2.  Hemicraniectomy versus medical treatment with large MCA infarct: a review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Paul Alexander; Diane Heels-Ansdell; Reed Siemieniuk; Neera Bhatnagar; Yaping Chang; Yutong Fei; Yuqing Zhang; Shelley McLeod; Kameshwar Prasad; Gordon Guyatt
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-11-24       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  Costs of clinical events in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients in the Netherlands: A systematic review.

Authors:  Alexander V van Schoonhoven; Judith J Gout-Zwart; Marijke J S de Vries; Antoinette D I van Asselt; Evgeni Dvortsin; Pepijn Vemer; Job F M van Boven; Maarten J Postma
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-09-06       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Decompressive hemicraniectomy for malignant middle cerebral artery infarction. Experience from the Western Province of Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Haifa M Algethamy; Afnan Samman; Saleh S Baeesa; Mohammed A Almekhlafi; Yousef A Al Said; Ahmed Hassan
Journal:  Neurosciences (Riyadh)       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 0.906

5.  A Real-World Assessment of Outcomes, Health Resource Utilization, and Costs Associated with Cerebral Edema in US Patients with Large Hemispheric Infarction.

Authors:  Nicole Tsao; Qiang Hou; Shih-Yin Chen; Steven R Messe
Journal:  Pharmacoecon Open       Date:  2021-08-22
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.