PURPOSE: To investigate MR imaging findings of primary hepatic neuroendocrine carcinoma (PHNEC) including preliminary observations on diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: MR images of eight patients with pathologically confirmed PHNEC were retrospectively analyzed. The morphological characteristics and dynamic enhancement patterns were evaluated. RESULTS: One case showed a well-defined solitary nodule with homogenous hypointensity on T1-weighted imaging (T1WI) and hyperintensity on T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) and DWI. The remaining seven cases appeared as well-defined dominant masses with multiple satellite nodules. The dominant masses demonstrated heterogeneous hypointensity on T1WI and hyperintensity on T2WI, which all appeared as a marked enhancement at arterial phase and rapid washout at portal venous phase. Six cases demonstrated rim-like enhancement at equilibrium phase. The satellite lesions showed heterogeneous hypointensity on T1WI and marked hyperintensity on T2WI with variable enhancements, such as homogeneous, rim-like enhancement. All the dominant masses and satellite nodules appeared as markedly hyperintensity and reduced apparent coefficient (ADCs) values on DWI. The mean ADC value of the tumors was significantly lower than that of surrounding liver parenchyma (1.02 ± 0.57 vs. 2.24 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s, p = 0.000). CONCLUSION: PHNECs typically appear as a large dominant hypervascular mass accompanied by satellite nodules, with rapid washout and capsular enhancement on dynamic MR imaging and restricted diffusion on DWI.
PURPOSE: To investigate MR imaging findings of primary hepatic neuroendocrine carcinoma (PHNEC) including preliminary observations on diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: MR images of eight patients with pathologically confirmed PHNEC were retrospectively analyzed. The morphological characteristics and dynamic enhancement patterns were evaluated. RESULTS: One case showed a well-defined solitary nodule with homogenous hypointensity on T1-weighted imaging (T1WI) and hyperintensity on T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) and DWI. The remaining seven cases appeared as well-defined dominant masses with multiple satellite nodules. The dominant masses demonstrated heterogeneous hypointensity on T1WI and hyperintensity on T2WI, which all appeared as a marked enhancement at arterial phase and rapid washout at portal venous phase. Six cases demonstrated rim-like enhancement at equilibrium phase. The satellite lesions showed heterogeneous hypointensity on T1WI and marked hyperintensity on T2WI with variable enhancements, such as homogeneous, rim-like enhancement. All the dominant masses and satellite nodules appeared as markedly hyperintensity and reduced apparent coefficient (ADCs) values on DWI. The mean ADC value of the tumors was significantly lower than that of surrounding liver parenchyma (1.02 ± 0.57 vs. 2.24 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s, p = 0.000). CONCLUSION: PHNECs typically appear as a large dominant hypervascular mass accompanied by satellite nodules, with rapid washout and capsular enhancement on dynamic MR imaging and restricted diffusion on DWI.