Tomoyoshi Takenaka1, Masakazu Katsura, Yasunori Shikada, Sadanori Takeo. 1. Department of Thoracic Surgery, Clinical Research Institute, National Hospital Organization, Kyushu Medical Center, Jigyohama 1-chome, 8-1, Chuo-ku, Fukuoka, 810-8563, Japan, ttake@surg2.med.kyushu-u.ac.jp.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The T3 category of the 7th Edition of the TNM classification of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has added two factors that do not appear in the 6th Edition, large tumor size (>7 cm) and pulmonary metastasis of the same lobe. These factors are considered to have different biological and clinical features. In the present study we assessed the outcome of surgical resection as a first line therapy for T3 NSCLC. METHODS: A total of 145 patients who were diagnosed according to the TNM 7th Edition with pathologic T3 NSCLC received surgical resection in our institution as a first line treatment. The outcomes of their treatment were analyzed. RESULTS: The 5-year survival rate was 46.9 %. On the basis of the 6th TNM Edition, the 5-year survival rate was 63.1 % for patients diagnosed with T2 disease (large tumor size), 44.3 % for patients diagnosed with T3 disease, and 33.1 % for patients diagnosed with T4 disease (pulmonary metastasis of the same lobe). There were no significant correlations between these categories and overall survival (OS). Nevertheless, 6th Edition T factors were found to be significantly correlated with lymph node status (p < 0.01). The univariate analyses showed that age, lymph node metastasis, and curative resection had significant effects on OS. In addition, the multivariate analysis identified age and N factor as independent prognostic factors in this cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Indications for surgical resection as a first line therapy in T3 NSCLC should be based on N factors and patient age. Lymph node metastasis, especially N2 disease, was increasingly frequent in patients with 6th Edition T classifications.
BACKGROUND: The T3 category of the 7th Edition of the TNM classification of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has added two factors that do not appear in the 6th Edition, large tumor size (>7 cm) and pulmonary metastasis of the same lobe. These factors are considered to have different biological and clinical features. In the present study we assessed the outcome of surgical resection as a first line therapy for T3 NSCLC. METHODS: A total of 145 patients who were diagnosed according to the TNM 7th Edition with pathologic T3 NSCLC received surgical resection in our institution as a first line treatment. The outcomes of their treatment were analyzed. RESULTS: The 5-year survival rate was 46.9 %. On the basis of the 6th TNM Edition, the 5-year survival rate was 63.1 % for patients diagnosed with T2 disease (large tumor size), 44.3 % for patients diagnosed with T3 disease, and 33.1 % for patients diagnosed with T4 disease (pulmonary metastasis of the same lobe). There were no significant correlations between these categories and overall survival (OS). Nevertheless, 6th Edition T factors were found to be significantly correlated with lymph node status (p < 0.01). The univariate analyses showed that age, lymph node metastasis, and curative resection had significant effects on OS. In addition, the multivariate analysis identified age and N factor as independent prognostic factors in this cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Indications for surgical resection as a first line therapy in T3 NSCLC should be based on N factors and patient age. Lymph node metastasis, especially N2 disease, was increasingly frequent in patients with 6th Edition T classifications.
Authors: Benedict D T Daly; Michael I Ebright; Allan J Walkey; Hiran C Fernando; Ken S Zaner; Donna M Morelli; Lisa A Kachnic Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 2011-02-01 Impact factor: 5.209
Authors: I Yoshino; R Nakanishi; T Osaki; S Hasuda; S Taga; M Takenoyama; T Yoshimatsu; K Yasumoto Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 1997-09 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: R Arriagada; A Auperin; S Burdett; J P Higgins; D H Johnson; T Le Chevalier; C Le Pechoux; M K B Parmar; J P Pignon; R L Souhami; R J Stephens; L A Stewart; J F Tierney; H Tribodet; J van Meerbeeck Journal: Lancet Date: 2010-03-24 Impact factor: 79.321