Literature DB >> 23942476

Predictive power of quantitative and qualitative fecal immunochemical tests for hemoglobin in population screening for colorectal neoplasm.

Yanqin Huang1, Qilong Li, Weiting Ge, Shanrong Cai, Suzhan Zhang, Shu Zheng.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of qualitative and quantitative fecal immunochemical tests (FITs) in population screening for colorectal neoplasm. A total of 9000 participants aged between 40 and 74 years were enrolled in this study. Each participant received two stool sampling tubes and was asked to simultaneously submit two stool samples from the same bowel movement. The stool samples of each participant were tested using an immunogold labeling FIT dipstick (qualitative FIT) and an automated fecal blood analyzer (quantitative FIT). Colonoscopy was performed for those who test positive in either FIT. The positive predictive values and population detection rates of the FITs for predicting colorectal neoplasm were compared. A total of 6494 (72.16%) participants simultaneously submitted two stool samples. The diagnostic consistency for a positive result between quantitative and qualitative FITs was poor (κ=0.278, 95% confidence interval=0.223-0.333). The positive predictive values of the quantitative FIT were significantly higher than those of the qualitative FIT for predicting large (≥1 cm) adenomas (23 cases, 14.29% and 16 cases, 6.72%, P=0.013) and colorectal cancer (10 cases, 6.21% and 5 cases, 2.10%, P=0.034); however, the population detection rate for advanced neoplasm of the quantitative FIT was not significantly different from that of the qualitative FIT. Quantitative FIT is superior to qualitative FIT in predicting advanced colorectal neoplasm during colorectal cancer screening. Further studies are needed to elucidate the causes of the predictive superiority.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 23942476     DOI: 10.1097/CEJ.0b013e328364f229

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer Prev        ISSN: 0959-8278            Impact factor:   2.497


  7 in total

1.  Time to fecal immunochemical test completion for colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Cameron B Haas; Amanda I Phipps; Anjum Hajat; Jessica Chubak; Karen J Wernli
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 2.229

Review 2.  Which bacterial toxins are worthy of validation as markers in colorectal cancer screening? A critical review.

Authors:  Kristyna Mezerova; Vladislav Raclavsky; Lubomir Stary
Journal:  Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub       Date:  2021-11-05       Impact factor: 1.245

3.  One-sample quantitative and two-sample qualitative faecal immunochemical tests for colorectal cancer screening: a cross-sectional study in China.

Authors:  Le Wang; Hongda Chen; Yunfeng Zhu; Ming Lu; Youqing Wang; Xinmin Chen; Weihua Ma; Lingbin Du; Wanqing Chen
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 3.006

Review 4.  Recommendations on Fecal Immunochemical Testing to Screen for Colorectal Neoplasia: A Consensus Statement by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Douglas J Robertson; Jeffrey K Lee; C Richard Boland; Jason A Dominitz; Francis M Giardiello; David A Johnson; Tonya Kaltenbach; David Lieberman; Theodore R Levin; Douglas K Rex
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 10.864

5.  Risk of Interval Cancer in Fecal Immunochemical Test Screening Significantly Higher During the Summer Months: Results from the National Cancer Screening Program in Korea.

Authors:  Jae Myung Cha; Mina Suh; Min Seob Kwak; Na Young Sung; Kui Son Choi; Boyoung Park; Jae Kwan Jun; Sang-Hyun Hwang; Do-Hoon Lee; Byung Chang Kim; You Kyoung Lee; Dong Soo Han
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 6.  Faecal Occult Blood Point-of-Care Tests.

Authors:  Barbara Kościelniak-Merak; Branimir Radosavljević; Andrzej Zając; Przemysław J Tomasik
Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2018-12

Review 7.  Emerging Designs of Electronic Devices in Biomedicine.

Authors:  Maria Laura Coluccio; Salvatore A Pullano; Marco Flavio Michele Vismara; Nicola Coppedè; Gerardo Perozziello; Patrizio Candeloro; Francesco Gentile; Natalia Malara
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2020-01-22       Impact factor: 2.891

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.