Literature DB >> 2394234

Recording and identification of single motor units in the free-to-move primate hand.

R N Lemon1, G W Mantel, P A Rea.   

Abstract

A new technique is described for recording the activity of single motor units in human or monkey hand muscles. A pair of microwire electrodes is introduced into the muscle using a fine needle. After insertion, the needle can be completely removed, leaving the recording microwires in situ. The method allows stable recording of a motor unit during natural movement of the hand and fingers. The identity of a given single motor unit was reflected in the form and amplitude of the motor unit-triggered average (MU-TA), derived by averaging the unrectified surface EMG recorded from the muscle with discharges of the motor unit. The MU-TA of a given unit remained constant despite variations in the form and size of its action potential. Inspection of successive MU-TAs increased confidence that records were taken from one and the same unit over long recording periods. Control experiments in human first dorsal interosseous showed that the peak-to-peak amplitude of the MU-TA was highly correlated with both the twitch force (r = 0.65-0.92, mean 0.82, six subjects) and force threshold (r = 0.62-0.93, mean 0.83) of a given unit. Similar findings were obtained for human abductor pollicis brevis (AbPB) motor units. In the monkey, AbPB motor units which were recruited early in a precision grip task and which discharged steadily during the grip had smaller MU-TAs than late-recruited, phasic units. The combination of methods described in this paper enable a single motor unit to be identified and recognised. The relative size of the unit, which is an important parameter in most motor unit studies, can be reliably estimated from the amplitude of the MU-TA. This allows indirect assessment of motor unit size in a free-to-move animal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2394234     DOI: 10.1007/bf00230105

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  20 in total

1.  Relation between size of neurons and their susceptibility to discharge.

Authors:  E HENNEMAN
Journal:  Science       Date:  1957-12-27       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Effects of single intracortical microstimuli in motor cortex on activity of identified forearm motor units in behaving monkeys.

Authors:  S S Palmer; E E Fetz
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Effect of motor unit firing pattern on twitches obtained by spike-triggered averaging.

Authors:  M A Nordstrom; T S Miles; J L Veale
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 3.217

4.  Muscle fibre conduction velocity in motor units of the human anterior tibial muscle: a new size principle parameter.

Authors:  S Andreassen; L Arendt-Nielsen
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Cross-correlation reveals facilitation of single motor units in thenar muscles by single corticospinal neurones in the conscious monkey.

Authors:  G W Mantel; R N Lemon
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  1987-06-01       Impact factor: 3.046

6.  A microwire technique for recording single neurons in unrestrained animals.

Authors:  C Palmer
Journal:  Brain Res Bull       Date:  1978 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.077

Review 7.  Motor unit and muscle activity in voluntary motor control.

Authors:  H J Freund
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  1983-04       Impact factor: 37.312

8.  An improved time-amplitude window discriminator.

Authors:  M J Bak; E M Schmidt
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1977-09       Impact factor: 4.538

9.  Innervation ratios for large and small limb muscles in the baboon.

Authors:  S H Wray
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1969-10       Impact factor: 3.215

10.  Motor units in cat soleus muscle: physiological, histochemical and morphological characteristics.

Authors:  R E Burke; D N Levine; M Salcman; P Tsairis
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1974-05       Impact factor: 5.182

View more
  10 in total

1.  Task dependence of responses in first dorsal interosseous muscle to magnetic brain stimulation in man.

Authors:  D Flament; P Goldsmith; C J Buckley; R N Lemon
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Recruitment order of motoneurons during functional tasks.

Authors:  K E Jones; M Lyons; P Bawa; R N Lemon
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Excitability of human upper limb motoneurones during rhythmic discharge tested with transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  E Olivier; P Bawa; R N Lemon
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1995-05-15       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  The influence of single monkey cortico-motoneuronal cells at different levels of activity in target muscles.

Authors:  K M Bennett; R N Lemon
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1994-06-01       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Interfacing Motor Units in Non-Human Primates Identifies a Principal Neural Component for Force Control Constrained by the Size Principle.

Authors:  Alessandro Del Vecchio; Rachael H A Jones; Ian S Schofield; Thomas M Kinfe; Jaime Ibáñez; Dario Farina; Stuart N Baker
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2022-08-22       Impact factor: 6.709

6.  Influences of object weight and instruction on grip force adjustments.

Authors:  C J Winstein; J H Abbs; D Petashnick
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Electromyographic evidence of two functional subdivisions in the rhesus monkey's flexor digitorum profundus.

Authors:  M H Schieber
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Recruitment of motor units in response to transcranial magnetic stimulation in man.

Authors:  P Bawa; R N Lemon
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Correlations between size parameters and the amplitude of the excitatory postsynaptic potential evoked by magnetic brain stimulation in human hand muscle motoneurons.

Authors:  F Awiszus; H Feistner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Long-latency Responses to a Mechanical Perturbation of the Index Finger Have a Spinal Component.

Authors:  Demetris S Soteropoulos; Stuart N Baker
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-04-03       Impact factor: 6.167

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.