Literature DB >> 2394232

Goal directed motor behavior and its adaptation following reversed tactile perception in man.

F Benedetti1.   

Abstract

When two adjacent fingers are crossed over each other and two tactile stimuli are touched to the two crossed fingertips, the two stimuli are perceived to be inverted in space. This phenomenon of tactile reversal was used in the present work to study the sensorimotor transformation occurring in goal directed motor behavior. When the subjects had to perform a movement toward a tactile stimulus (target) in tactile reversal conditions, the stimulus directed movements were performed wrongly, that is, away from the target. However, not all the subjects perceived a complete inversion of the stimuli; in this case, the target stimulus was perceived to be on the same side as its actual position, although with an error. In these conditions, the stimulus directed movements were performed correctly, that is, toward the target. These results show that the illusory spatial perception of the stimuli controls motor behavior on the basis of the amount of the perceptual error. Within the first hour of training, several compensatory responses occurred so as to produce correct motor performance. Despite this motor learning, reversed tactile perception remained reversed. Therefore, what subjects learned was the execution of the movements opposite to those necessary for reaching the target stimulus, without any change in perception. In the context of theories concerning the relationship between motor learning and perceptual adaptation, the present study shows that, with this experimental paradigm, motor learning during the first hour was mainly cognitive and did not have short-term effects upon perceptual processes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2394232     DOI: 10.1007/bf00230102

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  18 in total

1.  TWO TYPES OF ADAPTATION TO AN OPTICALLY-ROTATED VISUAL FIELD.

Authors:  H MIKAELIAN; R HELD
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  1964-06

2.  Motor-sensory feedback and the geometry of visual space.

Authors:  R HELD; J REKOSH
Journal:  Science       Date:  1963-08-23       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Perceptual learning following a long-lasting tactile reversal.

Authors:  F Benedetti
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Reorganization of tactile perception following the simulated amputation of one finger.

Authors:  F Benedetti
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.490

5.  Compensation for auditory re-arrangement in the absence of observer movement.

Authors:  R Kalil; S J Freedman
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  1967-04

6.  Processing of tactile spatial information with crossed fingers.

Authors:  F Benedetti
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Changing patterns of eye-head coordination during 6 h of optically reversed vision.

Authors:  G Melvill Jones; D Guitton; A Berthoz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Optimal input rates for tilt adaptation.

Authors:  S M Ebenholtz
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  1973-03

9.  Plasticity in sensory-motor systems.

Authors:  R Held
Journal:  Sci Am       Date:  1965-11       Impact factor: 2.142

10.  Localization of tactile stimuli and body parts in space: two dissociated perceptual experiences revealed by a lack of constancy in the presence of position sense and motor activity.

Authors:  F Benedetti
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  1 in total

1.  Fingers crossed! An investigation of somatotopic representations using spatial directional judgements.

Authors:  Alyanne M de Haan; Helen A Anema; H Chris Dijkerman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-24       Impact factor: 3.240

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.