Literature DB >> 23942167

Optimizing Interval Training at Power Output Associated With Peak Oxygen Uptake in Well-Trained Cyclists.

Bent R Rønnestad1, Joar Hansen.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the acute physiological responses of interval protocols using the minimal power output (MAP) that elicits peak oxygen uptake (V[Combining Dot Above]O2peak) as exercise intensity and different durations of work intervals during intermittent cycling. In randomized order, 13 well-trained male cyclists (V[Combining Dot Above]O2peak = 67 ± 6 ml·kg·min) performed 3 different interval protocols to exhaustion. Time to exhaustion and time ≥ 90% of V[Combining Dot Above]O2peak were measured with MAP as exercise intensity, and work duration of the intervals equals either 80% of Tmax, 50% of Tmax, or 30 seconds with recovery period being 50% of the work duration at intensity equal to 50% of MAP. The major findings were that the interval protocol using 30-second work periods induced longer time ≥90% of V[Combining Dot Above]O2peak and longer work duration at MAP intensity than the interval protocols using work periods of 50% of Tmax or 80% of Tmax (p ≤ 0.05). There was no difference between the protocols using work periods of 50% of Tmax or 80% of Tmax. In conclusion, the present study suggests that the 30-second work interval protocol acutely induces a larger exercise stimulus in well-trained cyclists than the protocols using work periods of 50% of Tmax or 80% of Tmax. The practical application of the present findings is that fixed 30-second work intervals can be used to optimize training time at MAP and time ≥90% of V[Combining Dot Above]O2peak in well-trained cyclists using MAP exercise intensity and a 2:1 work:recovery ratio.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 23942167     DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3182a73e8a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   3.775


  5 in total

1.  Six Weeks of Polarized Versus Moderate Intensity Distribution: A Pilot Intervention Study.

Authors:  Golo Röhrken; Steffen Held; Lars Donath
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2020-11-12       Impact factor: 4.566

2.  High-intensity resistance exercise is not as effective as traditional high-intensity interval exercise for increasing the cardiorespiratory response and energy expenditure in recreationally active subjects.

Authors:  Laura Järvinen; Sofi Lundin Petersdotter; Thomas Chaillou
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2021-11-19       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Time limit and V̇O2 kinetics at maximal aerobic velocity: Continuous vs. intermittent swimming trials.

Authors:  Tiago A F Almeida; Danilo A Massini; Osvaldo T Silva Júnior; Rubens Venditti Júnior; Mário A C Espada; Anderson G Macedo; Joana F Reis; Francisco B Alves; Dalton M Pessôa Filho
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-09-30       Impact factor: 4.755

4.  Physiological Responses During High-Intensity Interval Training in Young Swimmers.

Authors:  Tiago André Freire Almeida; Dalton Müller Pessôa Filho; Mário Cunha Espada; Joana Filipa Reis; Andrei Sancassani; Danilo Alexandre Massini; Fernando Jorge Santos; Francisco Besone Alves
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 4.566

5.  High-intensity decreasing interval training (HIDIT) increases time above 90% [Formula: see text]O2peak.

Authors:  Filippo Vaccari; N Giovanelli; S Lazzer
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2020-08-11       Impact factor: 3.078

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.