STUDY DESIGN: A single-center institutional review board-approved prospective cross-sectional observational study. CONTEXT: Urodynamic studies are essential to accurately direct bladder management following spinal cord injury (SCI). There is no consensus on how often testing should be performed. OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact of annual urodynamic studies on guiding bladder management following SCI. METHODS: Individuals with traumatic SCI undergoing annual urological evaluations were enrolled in this study. They had to be injured for at least 2 years so that urodynamic changes could be compared with their previous annual urodynamic evaluation. Changes in the urodynamic parameters and autonomic dysreflexia were determined by comparing this study with the previous year's study. All studies were done with the same physician and nursing staff. Demographic data, bladder management, urodynamic parameters, and the need and type of interventions based on the urodynamic study were obtained. The main outcome measure was whether or not there was a need for an intervention based on the urodynamics. Interventions were classified as urological intervention, non-urological intervention, or a combination of urological and non-urological intervention. The impact of the type of bladder management, length of injury, and level of injury was also evaluated. RESULTS: Ninety-six consecutive individuals with SCI undergoing annual urodynamic evaluations were enrolled over a 5-month period. Overall, 47.9% of individuals required at least one type of intervention based on urodynamic studies: 82.6% were urological interventions (medication changes were most common, comprising 54.3% of urological interventions); 13.0% were non-urological interventions; and 4.3% were a combination of non-urological and urological interventions. The need for interventions did not appear to be influenced by the type of bladder management, the length of time post-injury or level of injury. CONCLUSION: Annual urodynamic evaluation plays an important role in guiding bladder management following SCI.
STUDY DESIGN: A single-center institutional review board-approved prospective cross-sectional observational study. CONTEXT: Urodynamic studies are essential to accurately direct bladder management following spinal cord injury (SCI). There is no consensus on how often testing should be performed. OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact of annual urodynamic studies on guiding bladder management following SCI. METHODS: Individuals with traumatic SCI undergoing annual urological evaluations were enrolled in this study. They had to be injured for at least 2 years so that urodynamic changes could be compared with their previous annual urodynamic evaluation. Changes in the urodynamic parameters and autonomic dysreflexia were determined by comparing this study with the previous year's study. All studies were done with the same physician and nursing staff. Demographic data, bladder management, urodynamic parameters, and the need and type of interventions based on the urodynamic study were obtained. The main outcome measure was whether or not there was a need for an intervention based on the urodynamics. Interventions were classified as urological intervention, non-urological intervention, or a combination of urological and non-urological intervention. The impact of the type of bladder management, length of injury, and level of injury was also evaluated. RESULTS: Ninety-six consecutive individuals with SCI undergoing annual urodynamic evaluations were enrolled over a 5-month period. Overall, 47.9% of individuals required at least one type of intervention based on urodynamic studies: 82.6% were urological interventions (medication changes were most common, comprising 54.3% of urological interventions); 13.0% were non-urological interventions; and 4.3% were a combination of non-urological and urological interventions. The need for interventions did not appear to be influenced by the type of bladder management, the length of time post-injury or level of injury. CONCLUSION: Annual urodynamic evaluation plays an important role in guiding bladder management following SCI.
Authors: Steven C Kirshblum; Stephen P Burns; Fin Biering-Sorensen; William Donovan; Daniel E Graves; Amitabh Jha; Mark Johansen; Linda Jones; Andrei Krassioukov; M J Mulcahey; Mary Schmidt-Read; William Waring Journal: J Spinal Cord Med Date: 2011-11 Impact factor: 1.985
Authors: Abeer Khurram; Shani E Ross; Zachariah J Sperry; Aileen Ouyang; Christopher Stephan; Ahmad A Jiman; Tim M Bruns Journal: J Neural Eng Date: 2017-03-21 Impact factor: 5.379
Authors: Sarah A Moore; Nicolas Granger; Natasha J Olby; Ingo Spitzbarth; Nick D Jeffery; Andrea Tipold; Yvette S Nout-Lomas; Ronaldo C da Costa; Veronika M Stein; Linda J Noble-Haeusslein; Andrew R Blight; Robert G Grossman; D Michele Basso; Jonathan M Levine Journal: J Neurotrauma Date: 2017-03-22 Impact factor: 5.269