Literature DB >> 23941008

Thermography is not a feasible method for breast cancer screening.

Boris Brkljacić1, Damir Miletić, Francesco Sardanelli.   

Abstract

Breast cancer is a common malignancy causing high mortality in women especially in developed countries. Due to the contribution of mammographic screening and improvements in therapy, the mortality rate from breast cancer has decreased considerably. An imaging-based early detection of breast cancer improves the treatment outcome. Mammography is generally established not only as diagnostic but also as screening tool, while breast ultrasound plays a major role in the diagnostic setting in distinguishing solid lesions from cysts and in guiding tissue sampling. Several indications are established for contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Thermography was not validated as a screening tool and the only study performed long ago for evaluating this technology in the screening setting demonstrated very poor results. The conclusion that thermography might be feasible for screening cannot be derived from studies with small sample size, unclear selection of patients, and in which mammography and thermography were not blindly compared as screening modalities. Thermography can not be used to aspirate, biopsy or localize lesions preoperatively since no method so far was described to accurately transpose the thermographic location of the lesion to the mammogram or ultrasound and to surgical specimen. Thermography cannot be proclaimed as a screening method, without any evidence whatsoever.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23941008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Coll Antropol        ISSN: 0350-6134


  3 in total

1.  Position paper on screening for breast cancer by the European Society of Breast Imaging (EUSOBI) and 30 national breast radiology bodies from Austria, Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Israel, Lithuania, Moldova, The Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Serbia, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and Turkey.

Authors:  Francesco Sardanelli; Hildegunn S Aase; Marina Álvarez; Edward Azavedo; Henk J Baarslag; Corinne Balleyguier; Pascal A Baltzer; Vanesa Beslagic; Ulrich Bick; Dragana Bogdanovic-Stojanovic; Ruta Briediene; Boris Brkljacic; Julia Camps Herrero; Catherine Colin; Eleanor Cornford; Jan Danes; Gérard de Geer; Gul Esen; Andrew Evans; Michael H Fuchsjaeger; Fiona J Gilbert; Oswald Graf; Gormlaith Hargaden; Thomas H Helbich; Sylvia H Heywang-Köbrunner; Valentin Ivanov; Ásbjörn Jónsson; Christiane K Kuhl; Eugenia C Lisencu; Elzbieta Luczynska; Ritse M Mann; Jose C Marques; Laura Martincich; Margarete Mortier; Markus Müller-Schimpfle; Katalin Ormandi; Pietro Panizza; Federica Pediconi; Ruud M Pijnappel; Katja Pinker; Tarja Rissanen; Natalia Rotaru; Gianni Saguatti; Tamar Sella; Jana Slobodníková; Maret Talk; Patrice Taourel; Rubina M Trimboli; Ilse Vejborg; Athina Vourtsis; Gabor Forrai
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-11-02       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  The influence of size, depth and histologic characteristics of invasive ductal breast carcinoma on thermographic properties of the breast.

Authors:  Marko Mance; Krešimir Bulic; Anko Antabak; Milan Miloševic
Journal:  EXCLI J       Date:  2019-07-22       Impact factor: 4.068

Review 3.  Application of infrared thermography in computer aided diagnosis.

Authors:  Oliver Faust; U Rajendra Acharya; E Y K Ng; Tan Jen Hong; Wenwei Yu
Journal:  Infrared Phys Technol       Date:  2014-06-20       Impact factor: 2.638

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.