| Literature DB >> 23940605 |
Dorrit E Jacob1, Bernd Grohe, Michaela Geßner, Bodo B Beck, Bernd Hoppe.
Abstract
To investigate potential differences in stone composition with regard to the type of Primary Hyperoxaluria (PH), and in relation to the patient's medical therapy (treatment naïve patients versus those on preventive medication) we examined twelve kidney stones from ten PH I and six stones from four PH III patients. Unfortunately, no PH II stones were available for analysis. The study on this set of stones indicates a more diverse composition of PH stones than previously reported and a potential dynamic response of morphology and composition of calculi to treatment with crystallization inhibitors (citrate, magnesium) in PH I. Stones formed by PH I patients under treatment are more compact and consist predominantly of calcium-oxalate monohydrate (COM, whewellite), while calcium-oxalate dihydrate (COD, weddellite) is only rarely present. In contrast, the single stone available from a treatment naïve PH I patient as well as stones from PH III patients prior to and under treatment with alkali citrate contained a wide size range of aggregated COD crystals. No significant effects of the treatment were noted in PH III stones. In disagreement with findings from previous studies, stones from patients with primary hyperoxaluria did not exclusively consist of COM. Progressive replacement of COD by small COM crystals could be caused by prolonged stone growth and residence times in the urinary tract, eventually resulting in complete replacement of calcium-oxalate dihydrate by the monohydrate form. The noted difference to the naïve PH I stone may reflect a reduced growth rate in response to treatment. This pilot study highlights the importance of detailed stone diagnostics and could be of therapeutic relevance in calcium-oxalates urolithiasis, provided that the effects of treatment can be reproduced in subsequent larger studies.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23940605 PMCID: PMC3734250 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0070617
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Synopsis of stones used in this study with details of preventive treatment and genotype.
| Sample | PHsubtype | Gender,age (yr) | StoneComposition | Age at firstsymptom/ageat diagnosis | Past/ | Urinary Calciumexcretion (mg/kg/d)Diagnosis/current | Urinary oxalateexcretion(mmol/1.73 m2/d)Diagnosis/current | Plasmaoxalate(µmol/l)current | Treatment attime of stoneextraction,length (yrs) | Genotype |
| H1 | PH I | M, 21 | COM | 2/5 | Recurrent UL/ | 1.04/3.05 | 2.56/0.63 | 13.24 | Citrate+ Vit B6(p.resp.) (16) | c.508G>A/c.958delCA |
| H2 | PH I | M, 15 | COM | 1/7 | Recurrent UL/ | 4.83/0.83 | 2.32/1.37 | 8.43 | Citrate+ Vit B6(responsive) (9) | c.454T>A/c.1151T>C |
| H3, H5 | PH I | M, 21 | COM, COM | 4/12 | Recurrent UL/ | 1.6/1.09 | 1.08/0.92 | 16.69 | Citrate+ Vit B6(responsive) (9) | c.508G>A/c.846+1G>T |
| H6 | PH I | M, 12 | COM | 3/5 | Recurrent UL/ | 0.95/5.05 | 1.61/2.46 | 10.68 | Citrate+ Vit B6 (9)(HCT since 01/12) | c.481G>A/c.976DelG |
| H9 | PH I | F, 18 | COM | 3/12 | Recurrent UL/ | 1.8/1.75 | 1.76/1.48 | 11.14 | Citrate+ Vit B6(responsive) (8) | c.508G>A/c.846-3C>G |
| H10 | PH I | M, 25 | COM | ?/20 (ESRD) | Recurrent UL, mal-compliance/ | 2.12 (post Tx) | 5.32 (pre Tx) 0.37(post Tx) | 7.48 | Citrate (post Tx 7years) Vit B6(acute post Txperiod, respons.) | c.508G>A/c.846-3C>G |
| H18* | PH I | M, 23 | COD+COM | 4/14 | Recurrent UL/ | n.d./2.95 | 1.61/2.14 | 16.8 | None, (9) | c.121G>A/C.846+1G>A |
| H21b, H21w | PH I | M, 44 | COD+COM+CAP;COM, CAP | 3/36 | Recurrent UL/ | 0.6/0.35 | 2.76/2.92 | 35.26 | Citrate+ Mg (8) | c.449C>T/c.1110del |
| H25 | PH I | F, 16 | COM | 2/6 | Recurrent UL/ | 0.75/1.19 | 3.16/1.87 | 14.46 | Citrate+ Vit B6(not respons.) (10) | c.847-1G>C homozygous |
| H27 | PH I | F, 7 | COM | 1/3 | NC Grade I/ | n.d./0.74 | 1.7/0.61 | 19.64 | Citrate+ Vit B6(respons.) (4) | c.508G>A homozygous |
| H4 | PH III | F, 14 | COD | 1/13 | Recurrent UL infirst decade of life/ | 2.29/1.35 | 1.95/0.88 | 10.84 | Citrate (12) | c.221T>G/c.700+5G>T |
| H7*, H13,H24 | PH III | M, 3 | H7: COD+COM,H13: COD+COM,H24: CAP+COD | 3 months/8months | Recurrent UL in first yearsof life/ | Ca/Crea ratios0.5–0.8 mol/mol | 0.8 Ox/Crea ratioup to 3 mol/mol | 17.62 | None at H7,Citrate (2) | c.728C>A homozygous |
| H11 | PH III | M, 5 | COD+COM | 1/1.5 | Recurrent UL and stoneremoval duringfirst year of life/ | Ca/Crea0.42 mol/mol/4.46 | Ox/Crea1.51 mol/mol/2.87 | 12.26 | Citrate (3) | c.221T>G/c.700+5G>T |
| H28* | PH III | M, 3 | CAP+COM+COD | 1.5/1.5 | UL, stone removalprocedure/ | Ca/Crea0.36/0.78 mol/mol | Ox/Crearatio 0.449/0.316 mol/mol | n.d. | None (1.5) | c.700+5G>T homozygous |
Asterisk denotes stones from newly-diagnosed and at the time untreated patients.
stone composition determined by multiple spot analyses on one polished surface. UL = Urolithiasis, NC = Nephrocalcinosis, HCT = Hydrochlorothiazide, GFR = Glomerular Filtration Rate, p.resp. = partly responsive to vit. B6 treatment.
Figure 1Light microscopy photographs of typical calculi from patients diagnosed with primary hyperoxaluria.
Panels A and B show stones from patients diagnosed with PH I before receiving treatment (A, sample H18) and stones formed under treatment with citrate and vitamin B6 (B, sample H9). Panels C and D depict stones from an untreated PH III patient (C, sample H28) and from a patient treated with citrate (D, sample H4). Note in 1C the large very fine-grained COM region and smaller crystalline region (arrow) with bipyramidal COD crystals. The inset shows the back of this stone. Panels E and F depict typical idiopathic Ca-Ox stones for comparison consisting of COM only. Note the dark pigmentation and the characteristic core and mantle structure in the cut and polished cross-section. Scale bars A = 2 mm, B = 500 µm, C = 200 µm, D = 250 µm, E = 500 µm, F = 250 µm.
Figure 2Reflected light microscopic images (polarized light) of polished sections of selected stones mounted in epoxy resin (A–C) and exemplary baseline-corrected Raman spectra (D) that identify COD and COM in the analysed stones.
Stones in (A) and (B) are from patients diagnosed with PHI (A, sample H18) and PHIII (B, sample H11), but as yet untreated. The stone in C (sample H10) is from a PHI patient receiving treatment with citrate and vitamin B6 (Table 1). Note the aggregated and brittle appearance of the stones in A&B in contrast with the massive appearance of the one formed under treatment (C). Arrows in C point to small cavities in the otherwise compact stone matrix. Black features in the micrographs are holes and gaps in the mounts; the epoxy matrix is light grey. Phases were identified by Raman spectroscopy and characteristic measured spectra for COM and COD are shown in panel D. COM appears as light grey small grains in A, B and C and is clearly identified in D by the double Raman band at 1463 and 1490 cm−1, while COD has a single band at 1478 cm−1 [45]. COM = calcium oxalate monohydrate, COD = calcium oxalate dihydrate.
Figure 3SEM micrographs of PHI stone fragments from the treatment group.
Panels A–D are images of stones (samples H1, H3) showing open structured crystal aggregates. Surfaces (B) of stones and internal structures (C, D) appear to be formed by COM crystals. Panels E–H show surfaces (F) and internal structures (G, H) from more compact PHI stones (samples H6, H9, H10). Scale bars A, E: 400 µm; B, D, F: 40 µm; C: 115 µm; G: 4 µm; H: 100 µm.
Figure 4SEM micrographs of PHIII stone fragments.
Panels A–D show a complete stone (A), surface characteristics (B, C) and internal structures (D). Panel C reveals a section of B showing small COD crystals (bipyramidal shapes) grown on a large uneven COD surface. The unevenness possibly originates from organic compounds coating the crystal surface. Panel D shows doughnut-shaped COM crystals in the interstitial spaces between large COD crystals. Scale bars (sample ID) A: 400 µm (H11); B: 100 µm (H13); C: 4 µm (H13); D: 14 µm (H7).