Jignesh P Patel1, Bruce Green, Raj K Patel, Michael S Marsh, J Graham Davies, Roopen Arya. 1. King's Thrombosis Centre, Department of Haematological Medicine (J.P.P., R.K.P., R.A.), and Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (M.S.M.), King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, UK; Institute of Pharmaceutical Science, King's College London, UK (J.P.P., J.G.D.); and Model Answers Pty Ltd, Australia (B.G.).
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The optimal dosing strategy of low-molecular-weight heparins for the treatment of antenatal venous thromboembolism is not known. The physiological changes associated with pregnancy alter the pharmacokinetic profile of low-molecular-weight heparins, which has led to controversy and subsequent variation in practice, when pregnant women with venous thromboembolism are treated with low-molecular-weight heparins. Our objective was to develop a robust pharmacokinetic model of enoxaparin during the antenatal period to address this problem. METHOD AND RESULTS: Women prescribed antenatal enoxaparin were eligible to enroll in the study. Recruited women were reviewed monthly and had up to 3 anti-Xa activities (trough and 1 and 3 hours after dose) drawn at each clinic attendance. Compartmental pharmacokinetic modeling was conducted using nonlinear mixed-effects modeling. One hundred twenty-three patients contributed 795 anti-Xa activities for pharmacokinetic modeling purposes. Both enoxaparin clearance and volume of distribution were increased during pregnancy. Simulations of once- versus twice-daily enoxaparin administration demonstrated that both dosing regimens would reach target 3-hour plasma concentrations throughout the duration of the pregnancy. When trough anti-Xa activity was simulated, both once- and twice-daily regimens exhibited an increase in trough anti-Xa activity with the progression of pregnancy. This is explained by the significant increase in volume of distribution observed during pregnancy. CONCLUSIONS: The half-life of enoxaparin is prolonged with the progression of pregnancy, and our work provides compelling evidence for prescribing once-daily enoxaparin for the treatment of antenatal venous thromboembolism. National and international guideline recommendations should be reconsidered.
BACKGROUND: The optimal dosing strategy of low-molecular-weight heparins for the treatment of antenatalvenous thromboembolism is not known. The physiological changes associated with pregnancy alter the pharmacokinetic profile of low-molecular-weight heparins, which has led to controversy and subsequent variation in practice, when pregnant women with venous thromboembolism are treated with low-molecular-weight heparins. Our objective was to develop a robust pharmacokinetic model of enoxaparin during the antenatal period to address this problem. METHOD AND RESULTS:Women prescribed antenatalenoxaparin were eligible to enroll in the study. Recruited women were reviewed monthly and had up to 3 anti-Xa activities (trough and 1 and 3 hours after dose) drawn at each clinic attendance. Compartmental pharmacokinetic modeling was conducted using nonlinear mixed-effects modeling. One hundred twenty-three patients contributed 795 anti-Xa activities for pharmacokinetic modeling purposes. Both enoxaparin clearance and volume of distribution were increased during pregnancy. Simulations of once- versus twice-daily enoxaparin administration demonstrated that both dosing regimens would reach target 3-hour plasma concentrations throughout the duration of the pregnancy. When trough anti-Xa activity was simulated, both once- and twice-daily regimens exhibited an increase in trough anti-Xa activity with the progression of pregnancy. This is explained by the significant increase in volume of distribution observed during pregnancy. CONCLUSIONS: The half-life of enoxaparin is prolonged with the progression of pregnancy, and our work provides compelling evidence for prescribing once-daily enoxaparin for the treatment of antenatalvenous thromboembolism. National and international guideline recommendations should be reconsidered.
Authors: Jamil M Kazma; John van den Anker; Karel Allegaert; André Dallmann; Homa K Ahmadzia Journal: J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn Date: 2020-02-06 Impact factor: 2.745
Authors: Tian Yu; Sarah C Campbell; Chris Stockmann; Casey Tak; Katherine Schoen; Erin A S Clark; Michael W Varner; Michael G Spigarelli; Catherine M T Sherwin Journal: J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2015-12-22 Impact factor: 3.126
Authors: Francois Dos Santos; Lucia Baris; Alice Varley; Jerome Cornette; Joanna Allam; Philip Steer; Lorna Swan; Michael Gatzoulis; Jolien Roos-Hesselink; Mark R Johnson Journal: Obstet Med Date: 2020-06-02
Authors: Funda Celik; Alwin D R Huitema; Jan H Hooijberg; Arnold W J M van de Laar; Dees P M Brandjes; Victor E A Gerdes Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2015-04 Impact factor: 4.129