Literature DB >> 23939355

The short-term prognosis of cardiogenic shock can be determined using hemodynamic variables: a retrospective cohort study*.

Fabio Rigamonti1, Guillaume Graf, Paolo Merlani, Karim Bendjelid.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Few reports address the relationship between hemodynamic variables and the cardiogenic shock outcome in critically ill patients. The present study aimed to investigate the association between hemodynamic variables and early cardiogenic shock mortality in critically ill patients.
DESIGN: Retrospective, single-center cohort study.
SETTING: Tertiary academic hospital's 36-bed multidisciplinary intensive care. PATIENTS: Initial presentation with cardiogenic shock.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The authors retrospectively analyzed medical information and the hemodynamic variables (recorded during the first 24 hr following admission to the ICU) of patients with cardiogenic shock. For all the patients, the Simplified Acute Physiology Score II, cardiac index, cardiac power index, and continuous hemodynamic values following the first 24 hours of admission were reviewed. Mortality within 28 days was the primary endpoint. All the variables were then compared with survival and nonsurvival status and those variables with a significant association in the univariate analysis were entered into a multivariate logistic regression model. Seventy-one patients were included. Among them, 26 (37%) died within 28 days after ICU admission and were classified as "nonsurvivors." The minimum value for diastolic arterial blood pressure during the first 24 hours was independently associated with the 28-day mortality in the univariate and multivariate analyses model. This model performed better than the model using the Simplified Acute Physiology Score II, even when assessing the effect of inotrope and vasoactive treatments at 24, 48, and 72 hours.
CONCLUSIONS: In the first 24 hours of an ICU admission, the minimum diastolic arterial blood pressure was a hemodynamic variable that was independently associated with 28-day mortality in cardiogenic shock patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23939355     DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182982ac3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  9 in total

1.  Predictors of intra-aortic balloon pump hemodynamic failure in non-acute myocardial infarction cardiogenic shock.

Authors:  Steven Hsu; Swetha Kambhampati; Christopher M Sciortino; Stuart D Russell; Steven P Schulman
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2017-12-13       Impact factor: 4.749

Review 2.  Hypertension and patients with acute coronary syndrome: Putting blood pressure levels into perspective.

Authors:  Konstantinos Konstantinou; Costas Tsioufis; Areti Koumelli; Manos Mantzouranis; Alexandros Kasiakogias; Michalis Doumas; Dimitris Tousoulis
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2019-07-12       Impact factor: 3.738

Review 3.  Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Devices and ECMO in the Management of Acute Decompensated Heart Failure.

Authors:  William E Lawson; Michael Koo
Journal:  Clin Med Insights Cardiol       Date:  2015-04-01

Review 4.  Renal autoregulation and blood pressure management in circulatory shock.

Authors:  Emiel Hendrik Post; Jean-Louis Vincent
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2018-03-22       Impact factor: 9.097

5.  Differential responses to larger volume intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation: Hemodynamic and clinical outcomes.

Authors:  David A Baran; Gautam K Visveswaran; Ahmed Seliem; Michael DiVita; Najam Wasty; Marc Cohen
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2017-10-31       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Post-resuscitation diastolic blood pressure is a prognostic factor for outcomes of cardiac arrest patients: a multicenter retrospective registry-based analysis.

Authors:  Chien-Yu Chi; Min-Shan Tsai; Li-Kuo Kuo; Hsin-Hui Hsu; Wei-Chun Huang; Chih-Hung Lai; Herman Chih-Heng Chang; Chu-Lin Tsai; Chien-Hua Huang
Journal:  J Intensive Care       Date:  2022-08-06

Review 7.  Heart rate and diastolic arterial pressure in cardiac arrest patients: A nationwide, multicenter prospective registry.

Authors:  Chul Han; Jae Hoon Lee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-09-14       Impact factor: 3.752

8.  The baseline and repeated measurements of DBP to assess in-hospital mortality risk among critically ill patients with acute myocardial infarction: A retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Sulan Huang; Yanlan Luo; Li Liang; Ning Guo; Xiangjie Duan; Quan Zhou; Liangqing Ge
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-10-07       Impact factor: 1.817

9.  Prognostic Value of Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio in Cardiogenic Shock: A Cohort Study.

Authors:  Yangpei Peng; Jie Wang; Huaqiang Xiang; Yingbei Weng; Fangning Rong; Yangjing Xue; Kangting Ji
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2020-05-18
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.