Literature DB >> 23938362

Towards reference dosimetry for the MR-linac: magnetic field correction of the ionization chamber reading.

K Smit1, B van Asselen, J G M Kok, A H L Aalbers, J J W Lagendijk, B W Raaymakers.   

Abstract

In the UMC Utrecht a prototype MR-linac has been installed. The system consists of a 6 MV Elekta (Crawley, UK) linear accelerator and a 1.5 T Philips (Best, The Netherlands) Achieva MRI system. This paper investigates the feasibility to correct the ionization chamber reading for the magnetic field within the dosimetry calibration method described by Almond et al (1999 Med. Phys. 26 1847-70). Firstly, the feasibility of using an ionization chamber in an MR-linac was assessed by investigating possible influences of the magnetic field on NE2571 Farmer-type ionization chamber characteristics: linearity, repeatability, orientation in the magnetic field; and AAPM TG51 correction factor for voltage polarity and ion recombination. We found that these AAPM correction factors for the NE2571 chamber were not influenced by the magnetic field. Secondly, the influence of the permanent 1.5 T magnetic field on the NE2571 chamber reading was quantified. The reading is influenced by the magnetic field; therefore, a correction factor has been added. For the standardized setup used in this paper, the NE2571 chamber reading increases by 4.9% (± 0.2%) due to the transverse 1.5 T magnetic field. Dosimetry measurements in an MR-linac are feasible, if a setup-specific magnetic field correction factor (P1.5 T) for the charge reading is introduced. For the setup investigated in this paper, the P1.5 T has a value of 0.953.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23938362     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/58/17/5945

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  14 in total

1.  Relative dosimetry with an MR-linac: Response of ion chambers, diamond, and diode detectors for off-axis, depth dose, and output factor measurements.

Authors:  Daniel J O'Brien; James Dolan; Stefan Pencea; Nicholas Schupp; Gabriel O Sawakuchi
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Radiological tissue equivalence of deformable silicone-based chemical radiation dosimeters (FlexyDos3D).

Authors:  Yi Du; Ruoxi Wang; Meijiao Wang; Haizhen Yue; Yibao Zhang; Hao Wu; Weihu Wang
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2019-06-11       Impact factor: 2.102

3.  Development of a hybrid magnetic resonance/computed tomography-compatible phantom for magnetic resonance guided radiotherapy.

Authors:  Min-Joo Kim; Seu-Ran Lee; Kyu-Ho Song; Hyeon-Man Baek; Bo-Young Choe; Tae Suk Suh
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2020-03-23       Impact factor: 2.724

Review 4.  Positron emission tomography-magnetic resonance imaging: technical review.

Authors:  Raymond F Muzic; Frank P DiFilippo
Journal:  Semin Roentgenol       Date:  2014-10-18       Impact factor: 0.800

5.  Optical imaging method to quantify spatial dose variation due to the electron return effect in an MR-linac.

Authors:  Jacqueline M Andreozzi; Petr Brůža; Jochen Cammin; Brian W Pogue; David J Gladstone; Olga Green
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2019-12-25       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Multimodality functional imaging in radiation therapy planning: relationships between dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI, diffusion-weighted MRI, and 18F-FDG PET.

Authors:  Moisés Mera Iglesias; David Aramburu Núñez; José Luis Del Olmo Claudio; Antonio López Medina; Iago Landesa-Vázquez; Francisco Salvador Gómez; Brandon Driscoll; Catherine Coolens; José L Alba Castro; Victor Muñoz
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2015-02-19       Impact factor: 2.238

7.  Technical Note: Consistency of PTW30013 and FC65-G ion chamber magnetic field correction factors.

Authors:  S J Woodings; B van Asselen; T L van Soest; L A de Prez; J J W Lagendijk; B W Raaymakers; J W H Wolthaus
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2019-06-17       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Impact of magnetic fields on dose measurement with small ion chambers illustrated in high-resolution response maps.

Authors:  Joerg Lehmann; Toby Beveridge; Chris Oliver; Tracy E Bailey; Jessica E Lye; Jayde Livingstone; Andrew W Stevenson; Duncan J Butler
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2019-06-11       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 9.  Medical physics challenges in clinical MR-guided radiotherapy.

Authors:  Christopher Kurz; Giulia Buizza; Guillaume Landry; Florian Kamp; Moritz Rabe; Chiara Paganelli; Guido Baroni; Michael Reiner; Paul J Keall; Cornelis A T van den Berg; Marco Riboldi
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-05-05       Impact factor: 3.481

10.  Characterization of EBT3 radiochromic films for dosimetry of proton beams in the presence of magnetic fields.

Authors:  Fatima Padilla-Cabal; Peter Kuess; Dietmar Georg; Hugo Palmans; Lukas Fetty; Hermann Fuchs
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2019-05-31       Impact factor: 4.071

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.