Literature DB >> 23937756

Minimally invasive unilateral pedicle screw fixation and lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of lumbar degenerative disease.

Bin Lin, Yang Xu, Yong He, Bi Zhang, Qiuyan Lin, Mingchang He.   

Abstract

Minimally invasive unilateral pedicle screw fixation for the treatment of degenerative lumbar diseases has won the support of many surgeons. However, few data are available regarding clinical research on unilateral pedicle screw fixation associated with minimally invasive techniques for the treatment of lumbar spinal diseases. The purpose of this study was to evaluate clinical outcomes in a selected series of patients with lumbar degenerative diseases treated with minimally invasive unilateral vs classic bilateral pedicle screw fixation and lumbar interbody fusion. Patients in the unilateral group (n=43) underwent minimally invasive unilateral pedicle screw fixation with the Quadrant system (Medtronic, Memphis, Tennessee). The bilateral group (n=42) underwent bilateral instrumentation via the classic approach. Visual analog scale pain scores, Oswestry Disability Index scores, fusion rate, operative time, blood loss, and complications were analyzed. Mean operative time was 75 minutes in the unilateral group and 95 minutes in the bilateral group. Mean blood loss was 220 mL in the unilateral group and 450 mL in the bilateral group. Mean postoperative visual analog scale pain score was 3.10±0.16 in the unilateral group and 3.30±1.10 in the bilateral group. Mean postoperative Oswestry Disability Index score was 15.67±2.3 in the unilateral group and 14.93±2.6 in the bilateral group. Successful fusion was achieved in 92.34% of patients in the unilateral group and 93.56% of patients in the bilateral group. Minimally invasive unilateral pedicle screw fixation is an effective and reliable option for the surgical treatment of lumbar degenerative disease. It causes less blood loss, requires less operative time, and has a fusion rate comparable with that of conventional bilateral fixation. Copyright 2013, SLACK Incorporated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23937756     DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20130724-26

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopedics        ISSN: 0147-7447            Impact factor:   1.390


  14 in total

1.  Comparison of unilateral versus bilateral pedicle screw fixation in degenerative lumbar diseases: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ying-Chao Han; Zhu-Qing Liu; Shan-Jin Wang; Li-Jun Li; Jun Tan
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with unilateral pedicle screw fixation (UNILIF): morbidity, clinical and radiological 2-year outcomes of a 66-patient prospective series.

Authors:  H Giorgi; R Prebet; R Andriantsimiavona; P Tropiano; B Blondel; H F Parent
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Comparison of unilateral versus bilateral pedicle screw fixation with cage fusion in degenerative lumbar diseases: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Shan-Wen Xiao; Hua Jiang; Li-Jing Yang; Zeng-Ming Xiao
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-12-16       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  Unilateral versus Bilateral Instrumentation in Spinal Surgery: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Robert W Molinari; Ahmed Saleh; Robert Molinari; Jeff Hermsmeyer; Joseph R Dettori
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2015-06

5.  Minimally invasive unilateral versus bilateral technique in performing single-segment pedicle screw fixation and lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  Chen Chen; Xuecheng Cao; Lin Zou; Guangliang Hao; Zhenyu Zhou; Guichun Zhang
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 2.359

Review 6.  Quality and Quantity of Published Studies Evaluating Lumbar Fusion during the Past 10 Years: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Robert Hart; Jeffrey T Hermsmeyer; Rajiv K Sethi; Daniel C Norvell
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2015-06

7.  Unilateral versus bilateral pedicle screw fixation for degenerative lumbar diseases: a meta-analysis of 10 randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Xianzhou Li; Chaoliang Lv; Tingzhen Yan
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2015-03-16

8.  A meta-analysis of unilateral versus bilateral pedicle screw fixation in minimally invasive lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  Zheng Liu; Qi Fei; Bingqiang Wang; Pengfei Lv; Cheng Chi; Yong Yang; Fan Zhao; Jisheng Lin; Zhao Ma
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-06       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Unilateral Pedicle Screw Fixation with Bone Graft vs. Bilateral Pedicle Screw Fixation with Bone Graft or Cage: A Comparative Study.

Authors:  Si-Dong Yang; Qian Chen; Wen-Yuan Ding; Jian-Qiang Zhao; Ying-Ze Zhang; Yong Shen; Da-Long Yang
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2016-03-18

Review 10.  Unilateral versus bilateral pedicle screw fixation with posterior lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative diseases: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Huan Liu; Ying Xu; Si-Dong Yang; Tao Wang; Hui Wang; Feng-Yu Liu; Wen-Yuan Ding
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 1.889

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.