| Literature DB >> 23936558 |
Ernatus Martin Mkupasi1, Chummy Sikalizyo Sikasunge, Helena Aminiel Ngowi, Maria Vang Johansen.
Abstract
Porcine cysticercosis, an infection caused by Taenia solium metacestodes, is continuously being reported in low-income countries of Latin America, Asia, and sub-Saharan Africa. The disease was declared eradicable by the International Task Force for Diseases Eradication (ITFDE) in 1993, and it is listed among the 17 WHO Neglected Tropical Diseases and Neglected Zoonoses that are potentially eradicable. In view of that, WHO has proposed a step-wise approach to its elimination, including chemotherapy of infected pigs. Different drugs have been tested on porcine cysticercosis with varying efficacies. These include flubendazole, fenbendazole, albendazole, albendazole sulphoxide, oxfendazole, praziquantel, and nitazoxanide. This review summarises available information on the efficacies and adverse effects shown by these drugs in pigs. Oxfendazole has shown to be effective for the control of porcine cysticercosis; however, it needs to be integrated with other control approaches. There is a need for standardised guidelines for evaluating the efficacy of anthelmintics against porcine cysticercosis, and more efficacy studies are needed since the conclusions so far are based on a limited number of studies using few infected pigs.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23936558 PMCID: PMC3723597 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002200
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS Negl Trop Dis ISSN: 1935-2727
Efficacy of different anthelmintics tested against porcine cysticercosis.
| Reference | Anthelmintic | Dose (mg/kg) | Treated pigs | Control pigs | TE (wks) | KR | Effect on MC | Effect on BC |
| 12 | FLU | 5.5–40 | 15 | 11 | 1–4 | 0–100 | Variable | Variable |
| 14 | FBZ | 5–45 | 16 | 2 | 3–5 | NR | Good | Variable |
| 17 | ABZ | 30 & 50 | 12 | 5 | 10–12 | 89–99 | Good | Variable |
| 20 | ABZSO | 15 | 4 | 3 | 12 | 59–100 | Variable | Variable |
| 23 | PZQ | 50 | 4 | 4 | 10–12 | 0–10 | No effect | No effect |
| 23 | PZQ+OFZ | 30+50 | 4 | ,, | 10–12 | 100 | Good | Good |
| 23 | OFZ | 30 | 4 | ,, | 10–12 | 100 | Good | Good |
| 24 | OFZ | 10 | 6 | 6 | 10 | 88–96 | Good | Low |
| 24 | OFZ | 20 | 6 | ,, | 10 | 100 | Good | Good |
| 24 | OFZ | 30 | 5 | ,, | 10 | 100 | Good | Good |
| 25 | OFZ | 30 | 16 | 4 | 1–12 | 80–100 | Good | Variable |
| 26 | OFZ | 30 | 20 | 40 | 32 | 100 | Good | NE |
| 27 | OFZ | 30 | 20 | 20 | 1–26 | 82–100 | Good | Low |
| 32 | PZQ | 50 | 11 | 2 | 1–65 | 20–75 | Variable | Variable |
| 33 | PZQ | 25 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 55–100 | Variable | Variable |
| 33 | PZQ | 50 | 6 | ,, | 5 | 78–100 | Good | Variable |
| 33 | PZQ | 100 | 6 | ,, | 5 | 18–100 | Variable | Variable |
| 34 | NZX | 150 | 6 | 6 | 10 | 0 | No effect | No effect |
KR - Killing rate, TE - Time evaluated, MC - Muscular cysts, BC - Brain cysts, NE - Not evaluated, NR - Not reported, wks - weeks.
Reported adverse effects after anthelmintics treatment of porcine cysticercosis.
| Reference | Anthelmintic | Dose (mg/kg) | Treatment duration | Adverse effects |
| 12 | FLU | 5.5–40 | 10 consecutive days | Reduced appetite |
| 14 | FBZ | 5–45 | 7 or 14 consecutive days | Slightly reduced appetite |
| 17 | ABZ | 30 | 3 consecutive days | Lethargy and anorexia |
| 17 | ABZ | 50 | Single-dose treatment | Prostration, anorexia, lethargia, and death |
| 20 | ABZSO | 15 | 8 consecutive days | Ulcers developed in 2 pigs at injection site |
| 23 | PZQ | 50 | Single dose | No side effect reported |
| 23 | PZQ+OFZ | 30+50 | Single dose | No side effect reported |
| 23 | OFZ | 30 | Single dose | No side effect reported |
| 24 | OFZ | 10, 20 & 30 | Single dose | No side effect observed |
| 25 | OFZ | 30 | Single dose | No side effect observed |
| 26 | OFZ | 30 | Single dose | Not reported |
| 27 | OFZ | 30 | Single dose | Not reported |
| 32 | PZQ | 50 | >15 days | Not reported |
| 33 | PZQ | 25, 50 & 100 | Single day | Not reported |
| 34 | NZX | 150 | 7 consecutive days | No side effect observed |