Literature DB >> 23935258

Short-Run Prosocial Behavior in Response to Receiving Corrections and Affirmations in Three Therapeutic Communities.

Keith L Warren1, Nathan Doogan, George De Leon, Gary S Phillips, James Moody, Ashleigh Hodge.   

Abstract

Therapeutic communities (TC s) have a strong record of maintaining a high quality social climate on prison units. One possible reason for this is the system of mutual monitoring among TC residents, based on the assumption that peer affirmation of behavior in accord with TC norms and peer correction of behavior contrary to TC norms will lead to increased resident prosocial behavior. Laboratory experiments have demonstrated that such peer monitoring can lead to cooperation, but there has been no quantitative test of this hypothesis in an actual TC. In this article we test this assumption by using the affirmations that residents of three different TCs send as a measure of prosocial behavior following the reception of peer affirmations and corrections. At all three facilities residents send more affirmations following the reception of both affirmations and corrections, with this relationship being stronger and longer lasting after receiving affirmations. No other variable consistently predicts the number of affirmations that residents send to peers. These findings imply that mutual monitoring among TC residents can lead to increased levels of prosocial behavior within the facility, and that prosocial behavior in response to peer affirmations plays a key role.

Entities:  

Year:  2013        PMID: 23935258      PMCID: PMC3735223          DOI: 10.1080/10509674.2013.782776

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Offender Rehabil        ISSN: 1050-9674


  5 in total

1.  Treatment process in prison therapeutic communities: motivation, participation, and outcome.

Authors:  G Melnick; G De Leon; G Thomas; D Kressel; H K Wexler
Journal:  Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 3.829

2.  THE ENVIRONMENT AND DISEASE: ASSOCIATION OR CAUSATION?

Authors:  A B HILL
Journal:  Proc R Soc Med       Date:  1965-05

Review 3.  Five rules for the evolution of cooperation.

Authors:  Martin A Nowak
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-12-08       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Do dimensions of therapeutic community treatment predict retention and outcomes?

Authors:  Wallace Mandell; Maria O Edelen; Suzanne L Wenzel; James Dahl; Patricia Ebener
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  2008-01-14

5.  Verbal feedback in therapeutic communities: pull-ups and reciprocated pull-ups as predictors of graduation.

Authors:  Keith Warren; Danielle Hiance; Nathan Doogan; George De Leon; Gary Phillips
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  2012-10-12
  5 in total
  5 in total

1.  Building the community: Endogenous network formation, homophily and prosocial sorting among therapeutic community residents.

Authors:  Keith Warren; Benjamin Campbell; Skyler Cranmer; George De Leon; Nathan Doogan; Mackenzie Weiler; Fiona Doherty
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2019-11-26       Impact factor: 4.492

2.  Network Integration within a Prison-Based Therapeutic Community.

Authors:  David R Schaefer; Kimberly M Davidson; Dana L Haynie; Martin Bouchard
Journal:  Soc Networks       Date:  2020-08-07

3.  Semantic Networks, Schema Change, and Reincarceration Outcomes of Therapeutic Community Graduates.

Authors:  Nathan J Doogan; Keith Warren
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  2016-06-29

4.  Difference in Response to Feedback and Gender in Three Therapeutic Community Units.

Authors:  Keith Warren; Nathan J Doogan; Fiona Doherty
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 5.435

5.  A network of helping: Generalized reciprocity and cooperative behavior in response to peer and staff affirmations and corrections among therapeutic community residents.

Authors:  Nathan J Doogan; Keith Warren
Journal:  Addict Res Theory       Date:  2017-01-18
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.