Literature DB >> 23934607

Alterations in the EGFR pathway coincide in colorectal cancer and impact on prognosis.

Jens Neumann1, Laura Wehweck, Susanne Maatz, Jutta Engel, Thomas Kirchner, Andreas Jung.   

Abstract

Alterations of the downstream effectors of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) are common events in colorectal cancer (CRC) carcinogenesis. Since EGFR serves as a target for therapy and some downstream effectors of EGFR have predictive and prognostic impact, reliable information on the frequency and concordance of alterations in the signaling pathway has become clinically significant. We, therefore, determined the frequency and coincidence of mutations in the EGFR pathway. We also analyzed the concordance of these alterations between primary tumor and distant metastases. Furthermore, we assessed their prognostic relevance for the development of metastasis. Mutations of KRAS exon 2, BRAF exons 11 and 15, AKT exon 3, and PIK3CA exons 9 and 20 were analyzed by pyrosequencing in 171 primary CRC samples as well as in 63 corresponding metastases. Furthermore, the expression of PTEN and EGFR was assessed by immunohistochemistry. Of the 171 tumors investigated, 60.2 % showed mutations in one or more genes of pathways downstream of EGFR. KRAS exon 2 and BRAF exon 15 mutations were detected in 40.9 and 11.1 % of cases, respectively, and were mutually exclusive. Mutations in exons 9 and 20 of the PIK3CA gene (18.7 %) largely overlapped with exon 2 KRAS mutations (16 of 32 cases; 50.0 %) and, to a lesser extent, with exon 15 mutations of BRAF (2 of 32 cases; 6.3 %). Only one case had simultaneous mutations of AKT exon 3 (0.6 %) and BRAF exon 15. Mutation analysis for KRAS exon 2, BRAF exon 15, PIK3CA exon 20, and AKT exon 3 in primary tumors and in their corresponding metastases revealed 100 % concordance. In one case, a PIK3CA exon 9 mutation in the primary tumor could not be detected in the matched distant metastases (κ = 0.9). Three different scores were applied for the evaluation of EGFR immunohistochemistry, and the range of positive cases varied between 8.8 and 52.6 %. Loss of PTEN expression was detected in 38.6 %. Although the expression of both markers does coincide with KRAS exon 2, BRAF exon 15, AKT exon 3, and PIK3CA exons 9 and 20 mutations, high discordance rates were found. The presence of at least one alteration in downstream effectors of the EGFR pathway was associated with a higher rate of distant metastases (p = 0.002). PIK3CA exons 9 and 20 mutations overlap with KRAS exon 2 and BRAF exon 15 mutations, and BRAF exon 15 and AKT exon 3 mutations co-occur in a single tumor, whereas KRAS exon 2 and BRAF exon 15 mutations are mutually exclusive. This suggests that mutations in the PIK3CA/PTEN/AKT branch of the EGFR pathway are less important than those of the RAS/RAF/MAPK branch for the progression of CRC. We found no difference in the mutational status of KRAS exon 2, BRAF exon 15, and AKT exon 3 between primary tumor and distant metastasis, validating both for diagnostic purposes. PIK3CA exons 9 and 20 mutations can be discordant between primary tumor and distant metastasis, and therefore, the lesion which is targeted for therapy should be tested. Protein expression of PTEN and EGFR using current protocols yields highly discordant results, and better standardization is needed before these markers can be used for diagnostic purposes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23934607     DOI: 10.1007/s00428-013-1450-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Virchows Arch        ISSN: 0945-6317            Impact factor:   4.064


  38 in total

1.  Quality assurance for detection of estrogen and progesterone receptors by immunohistochemistry in Austrian pathology laboratories.

Authors:  Peter Regitnig; Angelika Reiner; Hans-Peter Dinges; Gerald Höfler; Elisabeth Müller-Holzner; Sigurd F Lax; Peter Obrist; Margaretha Rudas; Franz Quehenberger
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2002-09-17       Impact factor: 4.064

2.  Molecularly targeted therapy for metastatic colon cancer: proven treatments and promising new agents.

Authors:  Majed El Zouhairi; Aline Charabaty; Michael J Pishvaian
Journal:  Gastrointest Cancer Res       Date:  2011-01

3.  The importance of KRAS mutations and EGF61A>G polymorphism to the effect of cetuximab and irinotecan in metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  K-L Garm Spindler; N Pallisgaard; A A Rasmussen; J Lindebjerg; R F Andersen; D Crüger; A Jakobsen
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2009-01-29       Impact factor: 32.976

4.  PI3KCA/PTEN deregulation contributes to impaired responses to cetuximab in metastatic colorectal cancer patients.

Authors:  F Perrone; A Lampis; M Orsenigo; M Di Bartolomeo; A Gevorgyan; M Losa; M Frattini; C Riva; S Andreola; E Bajetta; L Bertario; E Leo; M A Pierotti; S Pilotti
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2008-07-31       Impact factor: 32.976

5.  High concordance of KRAS status between primary colorectal tumors and related metastatic sites: implications for clinical practice.

Authors:  Daniele Santini; Fotios Loupakis; Bruno Vincenzi; Irene Floriani; Irene Stasi; Emanuele Canestrari; Eliana Rulli; Paolo Enrico Maltese; Francesca Andreoni; Gianluca Masi; Francesco Graziano; Giacomo Giulio Baldi; Lisa Salvatore; Antonio Russo; Giuseppe Perrone; Maria Rosa Tommasino; Mauro Magnani; Alfredo Falcone; Giuseppe Tonini; Annamaria Ruzzo
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2008-12-04

6.  Molecular changes in the Ki-ras and APC genes in primary colorectal carcinoma and synchronous metastases compared with the findings in accompanying adenomas.

Authors:  P Zauber; M Sabbath-Solitare; S P Marotta; D T Bishop
Journal:  Mol Pathol       Date:  2003-06

7.  K-ras point mutations in human colorectal carcinomas: relation to aneuploidy and metastasis.

Authors:  B Suchy; C Zietz; H M Rabes
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  1992-08-19       Impact factor: 7.396

8.  Prevalence and heterogeneity of KRAS, BRAF, and PIK3CA mutations in primary colorectal adenocarcinomas and their corresponding metastases.

Authors:  Stephan E Baldus; Karl-L Schaefer; Rainer Engers; Dinah Hartleb; Nikolas H Stoecklein; Helmut E Gabbert
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2010-01-26       Impact factor: 12.531

9.  KRAS codon 61, 146 and BRAF mutations predict resistance to cetuximab plus irinotecan in KRAS codon 12 and 13 wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  F Loupakis; A Ruzzo; C Cremolini; B Vincenzi; L Salvatore; D Santini; G Masi; I Stasi; E Canestrari; E Rulli; I Floriani; K Bencardino; N Galluccio; V Catalano; G Tonini; M Magnani; G Fontanini; F Basolo; A Falcone; F Graziano
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-07-14       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  KRAS, BRAF and PIK3CA mutations and the loss of PTEN expression in Chinese patients with colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Chen Mao; Junhua Zhou; Zuyao Yang; Yafang Huang; Xinyin Wu; Hong Shen; Jinling Tang; Qing Chen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-07       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  14 in total

Review 1.  [Molecular pathology of colorectal cancer].

Authors:  J H L Neumann; A Jung; T Kirchner
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 1.011

2.  Molecular spectrum of KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, PIK3CA, TP53, and APC somatic gene mutations in Arab patients with colorectal cancer: determination of frequency and distribution pattern.

Authors:  Humaid O Al-Shamsi; Jeremy Jones; Yazan Fahmawi; Ibrahim Dahbour; Aziz Tabash; Reham Abdel-Wahab; Ahmed O S Abousamra; Kenna R Shaw; Lianchun Xiao; Manal M Hassan; Benjamin R Kipp; Scott Kopetz; Amr S Soliman; Robert R McWilliams; Robert A Wolff
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2016-12

Review 3.  Genetic and epigenetic biomarkers for diagnosis, prognosis and treatment of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Fabio Coppedè; Angela Lopomo; Roberto Spisni; Lucia Migliore
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 4.  Segmental distribution of some common molecular markers for colorectal cancer (CRC): influencing factors and potential implications.

Authors:  Petros Christakis Papagiorgis
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2016-02-03

5.  Molecular spectrum of KRAS, BRAF, and PIK3CA gene mutation: determination of frequency, distribution pattern in Indian colorectal carcinoma.

Authors:  Swati Bisht; Firoz Ahmad; Satyakam Sawaimoon; Simi Bhatia; Bibhu Ranjan Das
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2014-07-30       Impact factor: 3.064

6.  Highly sensitive detection of the PIK3CA (H1047R) mutation in colorectal cancer using a novel PCR-RFLP method.

Authors:  Wan-Ming Li; Ting-Ting Hu; Lin-Lin Zhou; Yi-Ming Feng; Yun-Yi Wang; Jin Fang
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 4.430

7.  Use of Multicenter Data in a Large Cancer Registry for Evaluation of Outcome and Implementation of Novel Concepts.

Authors:  Gabriele Schubert-Fritschle; Stephanie E Combs; Thomas Kirchner; Volkmar Nüssler; Jutta Engel
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2017-09-29       Impact factor: 6.244

8.  WNT signaling and distant metastasis in colon cancer through transcriptional activity of nuclear β-Catenin depend on active PI3K signaling.

Authors:  Steffen Ormanns; Jens Neumann; David Horst; Thomas Kirchner; Andreas Jung
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2014-05-30

9.  miRs-134 and -370 function as tumor suppressors in colorectal cancer by independently suppressing EGFR and PI3K signalling.

Authors:  Sherien M El-Daly; Mohammed L Abba; Nitin Patil; Heike Allgayer
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  BRAF, PIK3CA, and HER2 Oncogenic Alterations According to KRAS Mutation Status in Advanced Colorectal Cancers with Distant Metastasis.

Authors:  Soo Kyung Nam; Sumi Yun; Jiwon Koh; Yoonjin Kwak; An Na Seo; Kyoung Un Park; Duck-Woo Kim; Sung-Bum Kang; Woo Ho Kim; Hye Seung Lee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.