BACKGROUND: very few studies have examined the association between intra-individual reaction time variability and subsequent mortality. Furthermore, the ability of simple measures of variability to predict mortality has not been compared with more complex measures. METHOD: a prospective cohort study of 896 community-based Australian adults aged 70+ were interviewed up to four times from 1990 to 2002, with vital status assessed until June 2007. From this cohort, 770-790 participants were included in Cox proportional hazards regression models of survival. Vital status and time in study were used to conduct survival analyses. The mean reaction time and three measures of intra-individual reaction time variability were calculated separately across 20 trials of simple and choice reaction time tasks. Models were adjusted for a range of demographic, physical health and mental health measures. RESULTS: greater intra-individual simple reaction time variability, as assessed by the raw standard deviation (raw SD), coefficient of variation (CV) or the intra-individual standard deviation (ISD), was strongly associated with an increased hazard of all-cause mortality in adjusted Cox regression models. The mean reaction time had no significant association with mortality. CONCLUSION: intra-individual variability in simple reaction time appears to have a robust association with mortality over 17 years. Health professionals such as neuropsychologists may benefit in their detection of neuropathology by supplementing neuropsychiatric testing with the straightforward process of testing simple reaction time and calculating raw SD or CV.
BACKGROUND: very few studies have examined the association between intra-individual reaction time variability and subsequent mortality. Furthermore, the ability of simple measures of variability to predict mortality has not been compared with more complex measures. METHOD: a prospective cohort study of 896 community-based Australian adults aged 70+ were interviewed up to four times from 1990 to 2002, with vital status assessed until June 2007. From this cohort, 770-790 participants were included in Cox proportional hazards regression models of survival. Vital status and time in study were used to conduct survival analyses. The mean reaction time and three measures of intra-individual reaction time variability were calculated separately across 20 trials of simple and choice reaction time tasks. Models were adjusted for a range of demographic, physical health and mental health measures. RESULTS: greater intra-individual simple reaction time variability, as assessed by the raw standard deviation (raw SD), coefficient of variation (CV) or the intra-individual standard deviation (ISD), was strongly associated with an increased hazard of all-cause mortality in adjusted Cox regression models. The mean reaction time had no significant association with mortality. CONCLUSION: intra-individual variability in simple reaction time appears to have a robust association with mortality over 17 years. Health professionals such as neuropsychologists may benefit in their detection of neuropathology by supplementing neuropsychiatric testing with the straightforward process of testing simple reaction time and calculating raw SD or CV.
Entities:
Keywords:
all-cause mortality; coefficient of variation; intra-individual standard deviation; intra-individual variability; older people; reaction time
Authors: Steven Morrison; Cortney N Armitano; C Teal Raffaele; Stephen I Deutsch; Serina A Neumann; Hope Caracci; Maria R Urbano Journal: Exp Brain Res Date: 2018-06-06 Impact factor: 1.972
Authors: Steven Morrison; Jacquelyn Moxey; Nick Reilly; Daniel M Russell; Karen M Thomas; Alex A Grunsfeld Journal: Exp Brain Res Date: 2021-04-29 Impact factor: 1.972
Authors: Christopher R Brydges; Michelle C Carlson; Ryan M Andrews; George W Rebok; Allison A M Bielak Journal: J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci Date: 2021-03-14 Impact factor: 4.077
Authors: Nicole A Kochan; David Bunce; Sarah Pont; John D Crawford; Henry Brodaty; Perminder S Sachdev Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-08-09 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Eelco van Duinkerken; Guilherme J Schmidt; Ana Lúcia Taboada Gjorup; Carolina Ribeiro Mello; André Casarsa Marques; Áureo do Carmo Filho; Paula Regina Yuri Fukusawa; Simone Gonçalves de Assis; Júlio Cesar Tolentino; Sergio L Schmidt Journal: Behav Neurol Date: 2021-06-25 Impact factor: 3.342
Authors: Rogier A Kievit; Simon W Davis; John Griffiths; Marta M Correia; Richard N Henson Journal: Neuropsychologia Date: 2016-08-09 Impact factor: 3.139