Literature DB >> 23934314

Power and sample size calculations for Mendelian randomization studies using one genetic instrument.

Guy Freeman1, Benjamin J Cowling, C Mary Schooling.   

Abstract

Mendelian randomization, which is instrumental variable analysis using genetic variants as instruments, is an increasingly popular method of making causal inferences from observational studies. In order to design efficient Mendelian randomization studies, it is essential to calculate the sample sizes required. We present formulas for calculating the power of a Mendelian randomization study using one genetic instrument to detect an effect of a given size, and the minimum sample size required to detect effects for given levels of significance and power, using asymptotic statistical theory. We apply the formulas to some example data and compare the results with those from simulation methods. Power and sample size calculations using these formulas should be more straightforward to carry out than simulation approaches. These formulas make explicit that the sample size needed for Mendelian randomization study is inversely proportional to the square of the correlation between the genetic instrument and the exposure and proportional to the residual variance of the outcome after removing the effect of the exposure, as well as inversely proportional to the square of the effect size.

Keywords:  Mendelian randomization; power; sample size

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23934314     DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyt110

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0300-5771            Impact factor:   7.196


  61 in total

1.  Serum uric acid levels and cardiovascular disease: the Gordian knot.

Authors:  Efrén Martínez-Quintana; Antonio Tugores; Fayna Rodríguez-González
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Integration of summary data from GWAS and eQTL studies predicts complex trait gene targets.

Authors:  Zhihong Zhu; Futao Zhang; Han Hu; Andrew Bakshi; Matthew R Robinson; Joseph E Powell; Grant W Montgomery; Michael E Goddard; Naomi R Wray; Peter M Visscher; Jian Yang
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2016-03-28       Impact factor: 38.330

Review 3.  Mendelian Randomization as an Approach to Assess Causality Using Observational Data.

Authors:  Peggy Sekula; Fabiola Del Greco M; Cristian Pattaro; Anna Köttgen
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 10.121

4.  Inferring causal relationships between phenotypes using summary statistics from genome-wide association studies.

Authors:  Xiang-He Meng; Hui Shen; Xiang-Ding Chen; Hong-Mei Xiao; Hong-Wen Deng
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2018-02-19       Impact factor: 4.132

5.  Hypothyroidism and Kidney Function: A Mendelian Randomization Study.

Authors:  Christina Ellervik; Samia Mora; Paul M Ridker; Daniel I Chasman
Journal:  Thyroid       Date:  2020-02-14       Impact factor: 6.568

6.  Homocysteine-reducing B vitamins and ischemic heart disease: a separate-sample Mendelian randomization analysis.

Authors:  J V Zhao; C M Schooling
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2016-11-30       Impact factor: 4.016

7.  Instrumental variable methods for causal inference.

Authors:  Michael Baiocchi; Jing Cheng; Dylan S Small
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  No causal effect of serum urate on bone-related outcomes among a population of postmenopausal women and elderly men of Chinese Han ethnicity--a Mendelian randomization study.

Authors:  A Xiong; Q Yao; J He; W Fu; J Yu; Z Zhang
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-11-20       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Effects of selenium on coronary artery disease, type 2 diabetes and their risk factors: a Mendelian randomization study.

Authors:  Abigail A Rath; H Simon Lam; C Mary Schooling
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2021-04-07       Impact factor: 4.016

10.  The Role of Mendelian Randomization Studies in Deciphering the Effect of Obesity on Cancer.

Authors:  Zhe Fang; Mingyang Song; Dong Hoon Lee; Edward L Giovannucci
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 13.506

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.