Literature DB >> 23934011

Differential diagnosis of colorectal polyps with respect to similar capabilities of white light colonoscopy and narrow-band imaging.

Wei-Chih Shen1, Shwn-Huey Shieh, Ming-Hung Tsai, Tzu-Liang Kung, Wen-Hsin Huang, Chun-Fu Ting, Chun-Lung Feng.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The responses of polyps to light essentially determine the diagnostic capability of an endoscopy system in differentiating adenomas from hyperplastic polyps. Compared with white light colonoscopy (WLC), narrow-band imaging (NBI) is expected to improve the diagnostic capability. The diagnostic capabilities of WLC and NBI are evaluated and compared based on the polyp responses.
METHODS: The following WLC and NBI images were retrospectively reviewed and categorized: 195 images and polyps (89 WLC, 106 NBI) with the best visual quality were categorized in the best image group (BG), and 484 images of 242 polyps (both WLC and NBI) were categorized in the paired image group (PG). For each reflection of light used for WLC or NBI, the polyp responses were objectively expressed as reflection features. The reflection features were then used to establish a classification model for identifying adenomas. The diagnostic capability of reflection feature or classification model was measured by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).
RESULTS: In both image groups, the diverse and heterogeneous features of the polyp responses enabled accurate identification of adenomas, regardless of the light source used for WLC and NBI. For differential diagnosis of adenomas and hyperplastic polyps, the WLC and NBI did not significantly differ in BG (AUC, 0.905 and 0.922, respectively; P = 0.690) or in PG (AUC, 0.782 and 0. 769, respectively; P = 0.755).
CONCLUSIONS: Using WLC and NBI as classification models is effective in differential diagnosis of colorectal polyps and exhibited similar capabilities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23934011     DOI: 10.1007/s00384-013-1757-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 0179-1958            Impact factor:   2.571


  16 in total

Review 1.  Narrow-band imaging of the gastrointestinal tract.

Authors:  Manabu Muto; Takahiro Horimatsu; Yasumasa Ezoe; Kimiko Hori; Yoshiyuki Yukawa; Shuko Morita; Shinichi Miyamoto; Tsutomu Chiba
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-01-22       Impact factor: 7.527

2.  High accuracy of narrow band imaging without magnification for the real-time characterization of polyp histology and its comparison with high-definition white light colonoscopy: a prospective study.

Authors:  Amit Rastogi; John Keighley; Vikas Singh; Peggy Callahan; Ajay Bansal; Sachin Wani; Prateek Sharma
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-07-07       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 3.  Narrow band imaging and multiband imaging.

Authors:  Louis Michel Wong Kee Song; Douglas G Adler; Jason D Conway; David L Diehl; Francis A Farraye; Sergey V Kantsevoy; Richard Kwon; Petar Mamula; Betsy Rodriguez; Raj J Shah; William M Tierney
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 9.427

4.  A prospective comparative study of narrow-band imaging, chromoendoscopy, and conventional colonoscopy in the diagnosis of colorectal neoplasia.

Authors:  Han-Mo Chiu; Chi-Yang Chang; Chien-Chuan Chen; Yi-Chia Lee; Ming-Shiang Wu; Jaw-Town Lin; Chia-Tung Shun; Hsiu-Po Wang
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2006-09-27       Impact factor: 23.059

5.  Narrow-band imaging in the diagnosis of colorectal mucosal lesions: a pilot study.

Authors:  H Machida; Y Sano; Y Hamamoto; M Muto; T Kozu; H Tajiri; S Yoshida
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 10.093

6.  Comparison of white light and narrow band high definition images in predicting colon polyp histology, using standard colonoscopes without optical magnification.

Authors:  S Sikka; D A Ringold; S Jonnalagadda; B Banerjee
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2008-07-30       Impact factor: 10.093

7.  Narrow-band versus white-light high definition television endoscopic imaging for screening colonoscopy: a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  Andreas Adler; Jens Aschenbeck; Timur Yenerim; Michael Mayr; Alireza Aminalai; Rolf Drossel; Andreas Schröder; Matthias Scheel; Bertram Wiedenmann; Thomas Rösch
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 8.  Molecular biology of colon polyps and colon cancer.

Authors:  J I Allen
Journal:  Semin Surg Oncol       Date:  1995 Nov-Dec

9.  Diagnostic accuracy of narrow-band imaging and pit pattern analysis significantly improved for less-experienced endoscopists after an expanded training program.

Authors:  Reiji Higashi; Toshio Uraoka; Jun Kato; Kenji Kuwaki; Shin Ishikawa; Yutaka Saito; Takahisa Matsuda; Hiroaki Ikematsu; Yasushi Sano; Seiyuu Suzuki; Yoshitaka Murakami; Kazuhide Yamamoto
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2010-05-20       Impact factor: 9.427

10.  A comparison of conventional endoscopy, chromoendoscopy, and the optimal-band imaging system for the differentiation of neoplastic and non-neoplastic colonic polyps.

Authors:  Kazutomo Togashi; Hiroyuki Osawa; Koji Koinuma; Yoshikazu Hayashi; Tomohiko Miyata; Keijiro Sunada; Mitsuhiro Nokubi; Hisanaga Horie; Hironori Yamamoto
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 9.427

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.