Literature DB >> 23933807

Changes in soil microbial community structure with planting years and cultivars of tree peony (Paeonia suffruticosa).

Dong Xue1, Xiangdong Huang.   

Abstract

To understand the effects of planting tree peony (Paeonia suffruticosa) on soil microbial community structure, soil samples were collected from the tree peony gardens with three peony cultivars and three planting years, and adjacent wasteland at Luoyang, Henan Province of China. Soil microbial communities were analyzed by the polymerase chain reaction-denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (PCR-DGGE) of partial 16S rDNA and sequencing methods. With the succeeding development of tree peony garden ecosystems, soil pH, organic C, total P, and available P increased. Soil total N, the cell numbers of bacteria, fungi, and actinomycetes, the Shannon's diversity index (H), richness (S), and Evenness (E(H)) first showed an increasing trend after wasteland was reclaimed and then a decreasing trend became apparent after 5 years of planting. Principal component analysis based on DGGE banding patterns showed that the microbial community structures were influenced by tree peony cultivars and planting years, and the influences of planting years were greater than those of tree peony cultivars. Sequence analysis of the DGGE bands revealed that the dominant bacteria in tree peony garden soils belonged to Proteobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Actinobacteria, Firmicutes, Acidobacteria, Planctomycetes, Euryarchaeota, and Unclassified-bacteria. Moreover, some bacteria closely related to Bradyrhizobium, Sphingopyxis, Novosphingobium, and Sphingomonas, which have been associated with nitrogen fixation and recalcitrant compounds degradation, disappeared with the increasing planting years of tree peony. The bacteria had similarity of 100% compared with Pseudomonas mandelii which was a denitrifying bacteria, and increased gradually with increasing planting years of tree peony.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23933807     DOI: 10.1007/s11274-013-1457-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol        ISSN: 0959-3993            Impact factor:   3.312


  20 in total

1.  Microbial and geochemical assessment of bauxitic un-mined and post-mined chronosequence soils from Mocho Mountains, Jamaica.

Authors:  Dawn E Lewis; Ashvini Chauhan; John R White; Will Overholt; Stefan J Green; Puja Jasrotia; Denis Wafula; Charles Jagoe
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2012-03-04       Impact factor: 4.552

2.  Influence of plant polymers on the distribution and cultivation of bacteria in the phylum Acidobacteria.

Authors:  Stephanie A Eichorst; Cheryl R Kuske; Thomas M Schmidt
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2010-11-19       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Spatial stratification of soil bacterial populations in aggregates of diverse soils.

Authors:  Daniel Mummey; William Holben; Johan Six; Peter Stahl
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2006-04-06       Impact factor: 4.552

4.  The rhizosphere effect on bacteria antagonistic towards the pathogenic fungus Verticillium differs depending on plant species and site.

Authors:  Gabriele Berg; Katja Opelt; Christin Zachow; Jana Lottmann; Monika Götz; Rodrigo Costa; Kornelia Smalla
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Ecol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 4.194

5.  Analysis of denitrification genes and comparison of nosZ, cnorB and 16S rDNA from culturable denitrifying bacteria in potato cropping systems.

Authors:  C E Dandie; D L Burton; B J Zebarth; J T Trevors; C Goyer
Journal:  Syst Appl Microbiol       Date:  2006-06-21       Impact factor: 4.022

6.  How to get more out of molecular fingerprints: practical tools for microbial ecology.

Authors:  Massimo Marzorati; Lieven Wittebolle; Nico Boon; Daniele Daffonchio; Willy Verstraete
Journal:  Environ Microbiol       Date:  2008-03-04       Impact factor: 5.491

Review 7.  Molecular characteristics of xenobiotic-degrading sphingomonads.

Authors:  Andreas Stolz
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2008-11-11       Impact factor: 4.813

8.  Tropical soil bacterial communities in Malaysia: pH dominates in the equatorial tropics too.

Authors:  Binu M Tripathi; Mincheol Kim; Dharmesh Singh; Larisa Lee-Cruz; Ang Lai-Hoe; A N Ainuddin; Rusea Go; Raha Abdul Rahim; M H A Husni; Jongsik Chun; Jonathan M Adams
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2012-02-23       Impact factor: 4.552

9.  Is microbial community composition in boreal forest soils determined by pH, C-to-N ratio, the trees, or all three?

Authors:  Mona N Högberg; Peter Högberg; David D Myrold
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2006-10-11       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Interrelationship of Bradyrhizobium sp. and plant growth-promoting bacteria in cowpea: survival and symbiotic performance.

Authors:  Artenisa Cerqueira Rodrigues; Jadson Emanuel Lopes Antunes; Antônio Félix da Costa; José de Paula Oliveira; Marcia do Vale Barreto Figueiredo
Journal:  J Microbiol       Date:  2013-03-02       Impact factor: 3.422

View more
  4 in total

1.  Changes in soil microbial functional diversity and biochemical characteristics of tree peony with amendment of sewage sludge compost.

Authors:  Xiangdong Huang; Dong Xue; Lian Xue
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 2.  Emerging Function of Ecotype-Specific Splicing in the Recruitment of Commensal Microbiome.

Authors:  Yue-Han Li; Yuan-You Yang; Zhi-Gang Wang; Zhuo Chen
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-04-27       Impact factor: 6.208

3.  Bacterial diversity associated with wild caught Anopheles mosquitoes from Dak Nong Province, Vietnam using culture and DNA fingerprint.

Authors:  Chung Thuy Ngo; Fabien Aujoulat; Francisco Veas; Estelle Jumas-Bilak; Sylvie Manguin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-06       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Pepino (Solanum muricatum) planting increased diversity and abundance of bacterial communities in karst area.

Authors:  Jinxiang Hu; Hui Yang; Xiaohua Long; Zhaopu Liu; Zed Rengel
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.