Literature DB >> 23933180

Sex-related preferences for real and doll faces versus real and toy objects in young infants and adults.

Paola Escudero1, Rachel A Robbins, Scott P Johnson.   

Abstract

Findings of previous studies demonstrate sex-related preferences for toys in 6-month-old infants; boys prefer nonsocial or mechanical toys such as cars, whereas girls prefer social toys such as dolls. Here, we explored the innate versus learned nature of this sex-related preferences using multiple pictures of doll and real faces (of men and women) as well as pictures of toy and real objects (cars and stoves). In total, 48 4- and 5-month-old infants (24 girls and 24 boys) and 48 young adults (24 women and 24 men) saw six trials of all relevant pairs of faces and objects, with each trial containing a different exemplar of a stimulus type. The infant results showed no sex-related preferences; infants preferred faces of men and women regardless of whether they were real or doll faces. Similarly, adults did not show sex-related preferences for social versus nonsocial stimuli, but unlike infants they preferred faces of the opposite sex over objects. These results challenge claims of an innate basis for sex-related preferences for toy real stimuli and suggest that sex-related preferences result from maturational and social development that continues into adulthood.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adults; Face preference; Faces; Infants; Real objects; Sex-related preferences; Toys

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23933180      PMCID: PMC3766397          DOI: 10.1016/j.jecp.2013.07.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol        ISSN: 0022-0965


  14 in total

1.  Beautiful faces have variable reward value: fMRI and behavioral evidence.

Authors:  I Aharon; N Etcoff; D Ariely; C F Chabris; E O'Connor; H C Breiter
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2001-11-08       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 2.  Sex-related variation in human behavior and the brain.

Authors:  Melissa Hines
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2010-08-18       Impact factor: 20.229

3.  Behavioral masculinization is independent of genital masculinization in prenatally androgenized female rhesus macaques.

Authors:  R W Goy; F B Bercovitch; M C McBrair
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 3.587

4.  The development of gender stereotype components.

Authors:  C L Martin; C H Wood; J K Little
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  1990-12

5.  Representation of the gender of human faces by infants: a preference for female.

Authors:  Paul C Quinn; Joshua Yahr; Abbie Kuhn; Alan M Slater; Olivier Pascalils
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 1.490

6.  Prenatal hormones and postnatal socialization by parents as determinants of male-typical toy play in girls with congenital adrenal hyperplasia.

Authors:  Vickie L Pasterski; Mitchell E Geffner; Caroline Brain; Peter Hindmarsh; Charles Brook; Melissa Hines
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb

7.  Testosterone implants into the amygdala during the neonatal period masculinize the social play of juvenile female rats.

Authors:  M J Meaney; B S McEwen
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1986-11-29       Impact factor: 3.252

8.  Preference for attractive faces in human infants extends beyond conspecifics.

Authors:  Paul C Quinn; David J Kelly; Kang Lee; Olivier Pascalis; Alan M Slater
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2008-01

9.  Observations of parent reactions to sex-stereotyped behaviors: age and sex effects.

Authors:  B I Fagot; R Hagan
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  1991-06

10.  Androgen and the development of human sex-typical behavior: rough-and-tumble play and sex of preferred playmates in children with congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH).

Authors:  M Hines; F R Kaufman
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  1994-08
View more
  8 in total

1.  Parents' Influence on Infants' Gender-Typed Toy Preferences.

Authors:  Josh L Boe; Rebecca J Woods
Journal:  Sex Roles       Date:  2017-11-03

2.  Infant attention to same- and other-race faces.

Authors:  Anantha Singarajah; Jill Chanley; Yoselin Gutierrez; Yoselin Cordon; Bryan Nguyen; Lauren Burakowski; Scott P Johnson
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2016-11-26

3.  Visual search and attention to faces during early infancy.

Authors:  Michael C Frank; Dima Amso; Scott P Johnson
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2013-11-06

4.  Sex differences in autism spectrum disorder based on DSM-5 criteria: evidence from clinician and teacher reporting.

Authors:  Rachel M Hiller; Robyn L Young; Nathan Weber
Journal:  J Abnorm Child Psychol       Date:  2014-11

5.  Do Animals Engage Greater Social Attention in Autism? An Eye Tracking Analysis.

Authors:  Georgitta J Valiyamattam; Harish Katti; Vinay K Chaganti; Marguerite E O'Haire; Virender Sachdeva
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-06-16

6.  Visual attention to faces in children with autism spectrum disorder: are there sex differences?

Authors:  Clare Harrop; Desiree Jones; Shuting Zheng; Sallie Nowell; Robert Schultz; Julia Parish-Morris
Journal:  Mol Autism       Date:  2019-06-28       Impact factor: 7.509

7.  Parents' Autistic Personality Traits and Sex-Biased Family Ratio Determine the Amount of Technical Toy Choice.

Authors:  Chris Lange-Küttner; Messiah A Korte; Christina Stamouli
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-09-20

8.  How Large Are Gender Differences in Toy Preferences? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Toy Preference Research.

Authors:  Jac T M Davis; Melissa Hines
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2020-01-27
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.