Literature DB >> 23933053

Emergency department visits in the United States for upper urinary tract stones: trends in hospitalization and charges.

Khurshid R Ghani1, Florian Roghmann2, Jesse D Sammon3, Vincent Trudeau4, Shyam Sukumar3, Haider Rahbar3, Ramesh Kumar3, Pierre I Karakiewicz4, James O Peabody3, Mani Menon3, Maxine Sun4, Quoc-Dien Trinh5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Using the Nationwide Emergency Department Sample (NEDS) we examined trends in visits, hospitalization and charges for patients with upper urinary tract stones who presented to the emergency department in the United States.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: All visits with a primary diagnosis of kidney calculus (ICD-9-CM code 592.0), ureter calculus (592.1) or urinary calculus unspecified (592.9) were extracted from NEDS between 2006 and 2009. A weighted sample was used to calculate incidence rates. Temporal trends were quantified by the estimated annual percent change. Patient and hospital characteristics associated with hospitalization were evaluated using logistic regression models adjusted for clustering.
RESULTS: Between 2006 and 2009 there were 3,635,054 emergency department visits for upper urinary tract stones. The incidence increased from 289 to 306/100,000 individuals. More men visited than women but women showed significant increases in visits (estimated annual percent change 2.85%, p = 0.018). Total monthly emergency department visits ranged from 5.8% in February to 8.4% in August. Overall 12.0% of patients were hospitalized and the hospitalization rate remained stable (estimated annual percent change -1.02%, p = 0.634). Patients were more likely to be hospitalized if they were female, more ill, seen at an urban teaching or low volume hospital, or had Medicaid or Medicare (each p <0.001). Sepsis was associated with the highest likelihood of hospital admission (OR 69.64, p <0.001). In 2009 charges for emergency department visits increased to $5 billion (estimated annual percent change 10.06%, p = 0.003).
CONCLUSIONS: Women showed significant annual increases in emergency department visits for upper urinary tract stones. While emergency department charges increased substantially, hospitalization rates remained stable. Greater use of computerized tomography and medical expulsive therapy could be the reasons for this observation, which warrants further study.
Copyright © 2014 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CCI; CT; Charlson comorbidity index; EAPC; ED; MET; computerized tomography; emergencies; emergency department; estimated annual percent change; fees and charges; hospitalization; medical expulsive therapy; urinary tract; urolithiasis

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23933053     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.07.098

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  29 in total

1.  The potential of at-home prediction of the formation of urolithiasis by simple multi-frequency electrical conductivity of the urine and the comparison of its performance with urine ion-related indices, color and specific gravity.

Authors:  Angelito A Silverio; Wen-Yaw Chung; Cheanyeh Cheng; Hai-Lung Wang; Chien-Min Kung; Jun Chen; Vincent F S Tsai
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2015-08-13       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 2.  The microbiome of the urinary tract--a role beyond infection.

Authors:  Samantha A Whiteside; Hassan Razvi; Sumit Dave; Gregor Reid; Jeremy P Burton
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2015-01-20       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 3.  Medical expulsive therapy for ureteral stones: where do we go from here?

Authors:  Bhaskar K Somani; Omar Aboumarzouk; Olivier Traxer; Joyce Baard; Guido Kamphuis; Jean de la Rosette
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 14.432

4.  Design and challenges of a randomized clinical trial of medical expulsive therapy (tamsulosin) for urolithiasis in the emergency department.

Authors:  Pamela K Burrows; Judd E Hollander; Allan B Wolfson; Michael C Kurz; Lorna Richards; Sara DiFiore; Phillip Watts; Nivedita Patkar; Jeremy Brown; Stephen Jackman; Ziya Kirkali; John W Kusek; Chloe Michel; Andrew C Meltzer
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2016-11-23       Impact factor: 2.226

5.  Simultaneous vs staged treatment of urolithiasis in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Boyd R Viers; Matthew K Tollefson; David E Patterson; Matthew T Gettman; Amy E Krambeck
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2014-11-16       Impact factor: 1.337

Review 6.  Handling and protecting your flexible ureteroscope: how to maximise scope usage.

Authors:  Khaled Hosny; Jennifer Clark; Shalom J Srirangam
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2019-09

7.  Assessment of the combination of temperature and relative humidity on kidney stone presentations.

Authors:  Michelle E Ross; Ana M Vicedo-Cabrera; Robert E Kopp; Lihai Song; David S Goldfarb; Jose Pulido; Steven Warner; Susan L Furth; Gregory E Tasian
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2017-12-28       Impact factor: 6.498

8.  Evaluation of Renal Calculi Passage While Riding a Roller Coaster.

Authors:  Michael R Bailey
Journal:  J Am Osteopath Assoc       Date:  2017-06-01

9.  Some Work on the Diagnosis and Management of Kidney Stones with Ultrasound.

Authors:  Julianna C Simon; Adam D Maxwell; Michael R Bailey
Journal:  Acoust Today       Date:  2017

10.  Payer Type, Race/Ethnicity, and the Timing of Surgical Management of Urinary Stone Disease.

Authors:  William D Brubaker; Kai B Dallas; Christopher S Elliott; Alan C Pao; Glenn M Chertow; John T Leppert; Simon L Conti
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2018-11-16       Impact factor: 2.942

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.