BACKGROUND: Veterans Health Administration (VHA) is a national health care system with variation in hand hygiene (HH) measurement and improvement practices across its facilities. The objective of this national survey was to characterize this variability and identify opportunities for standardization. METHODS: Survey covered 3 major areas of HH: (1) methods of measuring HH compliance, (2) interventions to improve HH compliance, and (3) site-specific targets for HH compliance. RESULTS: One hundred forty-one (100%) VHA medical centers returned the survey. A majority (98.6%) of the medical centers conduct direct observations to measure HH compliance rates. Fewer than half (45.3%) validate the observer process at the onset, and fewer still (39.6%) continue to validate observers. Main behaviors that are considered HH opportunities are room entry (69.1%) and exit (71.9%). Improvement interventions include posters (97.2%), feedback (eg, 98.6% to leadership), and improved access to HH products (eg, 90.6% provide individual hand sanitizers to staff). Mandatory education programs for clinical staff are conducted in 88.5% of the medical centers. The majority of the medical centers (77.3%) set their HH compliance target over 90%. CONCLUSION: Although HH improvement interventions are relatively similar across VHA medical centers, variation exists in compliance monitoring. Findings will assist in standardizing surveillance and next steps in hand hygiene policy in VHA. Published by Mosby, Inc.
BACKGROUND: Veterans Health Administration (VHA) is a national health care system with variation in hand hygiene (HH) measurement and improvement practices across its facilities. The objective of this national survey was to characterize this variability and identify opportunities for standardization. METHODS: Survey covered 3 major areas of HH: (1) methods of measuring HH compliance, (2) interventions to improve HH compliance, and (3) site-specific targets for HH compliance. RESULTS: One hundred forty-one (100%) VHA medical centers returned the survey. A majority (98.6%) of the medical centers conduct direct observations to measure HH compliance rates. Fewer than half (45.3%) validate the observer process at the onset, and fewer still (39.6%) continue to validate observers. Main behaviors that are considered HH opportunities are room entry (69.1%) and exit (71.9%). Improvement interventions include posters (97.2%), feedback (eg, 98.6% to leadership), and improved access to HH products (eg, 90.6% provide individual hand sanitizers to staff). Mandatory education programs for clinical staff are conducted in 88.5% of the medical centers. The majority of the medical centers (77.3%) set their HH compliance target over 90%. CONCLUSION: Although HH improvement interventions are relatively similar across VHA medical centers, variation exists in compliance monitoring. Findings will assist in standardizing surveillance and next steps in hand hygiene policy in VHA. Published by Mosby, Inc.
Keywords:
Compliance; Intervention; Monitoring; System-wide survey; VA
Authors: Humberto Guanche Garcell; Ariadna Villanueva Arias; Isme Borroto Garcés; Alexis Cardoso Gil; Pedro Rivero Companioni; Katiana Figueredo Arias; Osiris I Escobar More; Norgely Rivero Rodríguez; Francisco Gutierrez García Journal: Oman Med J Date: 2018-01
Authors: John Adam Reich; Monica E Goodstein; Susan E Callahan; Kathleen M Callahan; Lindsay W Crossley; Shira I Doron; David R Snydman; Stanley A Nasraway Journal: Crit Care Date: 2015-08-14 Impact factor: 9.097
Authors: Barbara Liu; Julia E Moore; Ummukulthum Almaawiy; Wai-Hin Chan; Sobia Khan; Joycelyne Ewusie; Jemila S Hamid; Sharon E Straus Journal: Age Ageing Date: 2018-01-01 Impact factor: 10.668
Authors: Daniel J Livorsi; Cassie Cunningham Goedken; Michael Sauder; Mark W Vander Weg; Eli N Perencevich; Heather Schacht Reisinger Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2018-10-05