Literature DB >> 23932821

Earlier-start versus usual-start dialysis in patients with community-acquired acute kidney injury: a randomized controlled trial.

Tukaram E Jamale1, Niwrutti K Hase, Manjunath Kulkarni, K J Pradeep, Vaibhav Keskar, Sunil Jawale, Dinesh Mahajan.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Optimum timing of the initiation of dialysis therapy in acute kidney injury is not clear. STUDY
DESIGN: Prospective, open label, 2-arm, randomized, controlled trial. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: 208 adults with acute kidney injury with progressively worsening azotemia at the artificial kidney dialysis unit of a tertiary-care referral center in western India. INTERVENTION: Earlier-start dialysis was initiated when serum urea nitrogen and/or creatinine levels increased to 70 and 7 mg/dL, respectively, whereas the usual-start dialysis patients (control group) received dialysis when clinically indicated as judged by treating nephrologists. OUTCOMES: Primary outcome was in-hospital mortality and dialysis dependence at 3 months. Secondary outcome in patients receiving dialysis was time to recovery of kidney function, computed from time of enrollment to the last dialysis session.
RESULTS: Of 585 screened patients, 102 were assigned to earlier-start dialysis, and 106 to usual-start dialysis. Baseline characteristics were similar between randomized groups. 93 (91.1%) and 88 (83.1%) participants received dialysis in the intervention and control groups, respectively. Mean serum urea nitrogen and serum creatinine levels at dialysis therapy initiation were 71.7 ± 21.7 (SD) and 7.4 ± 5.3 mg/dL, respectively, in the intervention group versus 100.9 ± 32.6 and 10.41 ± 3.3 mg/dL in the control group. Data on primary outcome were available for all patients. In-hospital mortality was 20.5% and 12.2% in the intervention and control groups, respectively (relative risk, 1.67; 95% CI, 0.88-3.17; P = 0.2). 4.9% and 4.7% of patients in the intervention and control groups, respectively, were dialysis dependent at 3 months (relative risk, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.29-3.7; P = 0.9). LIMITATIONS: Study was not double blind, event rate (ie, mortality) was less than predicted, wide CIs preclude definitive findings.
CONCLUSIONS: Our data do not support the earlier initiation of dialysis therapy in community-acquired acute kidney injury.
Copyright © 2013 National Kidney Foundation, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acute kidney injury; dialysis dependence; dialysis start; mortality

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23932821     DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2013.06.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis        ISSN: 0272-6386            Impact factor:   8.860


  40 in total

1.  Does early-start renal replacement therapy improve outcomes for patients with acute kidney injury?

Authors:  John R Prowle; Andrew Davenport
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 10.612

2.  Does this patient with AKI need RRT?

Authors:  Miet Schetz; Lui G Forni; Michael Joannidis
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Comparison of standard and accelerated initiation of renal replacement therapy in acute kidney injury.

Authors:  Ron Wald; Neill K J Adhikari; Orla M Smith; Matthew A Weir; Karen Pope; Ashley Cohen; Kevin Thorpe; Lauralyn McIntyre; Francois Lamontagne; Mark Soth; Margaret Herridge; Stephen Lapinsky; Edward Clark; Amit X Garg; Swapnil Hiremath; David Klein; C David Mazer; Robert M A Richardson; M Elizabeth Wilcox; Jan O Friedrich; Karen E A Burns; Sean M Bagshaw
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2015-07-08       Impact factor: 10.612

4.  Should we apply "early" initiation of renal replacement therapy to critically ill patients with acute kidney injury?

Authors:  Matthieu Legrand
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 2.895

5.  A policy of preemption: the timing of renal replacement therapy in AKI.

Authors:  F Perry Wilson
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2014-08-08       Impact factor: 8.237

6.  Acute kidney injury: Timing of renal replacement therapy in AKI.

Authors:  Sean M Bagshaw; Ron Wald
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2016-06-27       Impact factor: 28.314

7.  RRT in AKI: Start Early or Wait?

Authors:  Kathleen D Liu; Paul M Palevsky
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 8.237

Review 8.  Timing of initiation of renal replacement therapy for acute kidney injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials.

Authors:  Yongxing Xu; Jianjun Gao; Xinming Zheng; Bo Zhong; Yu Na; Jiamei Wei
Journal:  Clin Exp Nephrol       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 2.801

Review 9.  Current state of the art for renal replacement therapy in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury.

Authors:  Sean M Bagshaw; Michael Darmon; Marlies Ostermann; Fredric O Finkelstein; Ron Wald; Ashita J Tolwani; Stuart L Goldstein; David J Gattas; Shigehiko Uchino; Eric A Hoste; Stephane Gaudry
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2017-03-13       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 10.  The Japanese clinical practice guideline for acute kidney injury 2016.

Authors:  Kent Doi; Osamu Nishida; Takashi Shigematsu; Tomohito Sadahiro; Noritomo Itami; Kunitoshi Iseki; Yukio Yuzawa; Hirokazu Okada; Daisuke Koya; Hideyasu Kiyomoto; Yugo Shibagaki; Kenichi Matsuda; Akihiko Kato; Terumasa Hayashi; Tomonari Ogawa; Tatsuo Tsukamoto; Eisei Noiri; Shigeo Negi; Koichi Kamei; Hirotsugu Kitayama; Naoki Kashihara; Toshiki Moriyama; Yoshio Terada
Journal:  Clin Exp Nephrol       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 2.801

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.