Literature DB >> 2393282

Comparison of cefprozil and cefaclor pharmacokinetics and tissue penetration.

R H Barbhaiya1, U A Shukla, C R Gleason, W C Shyu, R B Wilber, K A Pittman.   

Abstract

The pharmacokinetics and tissue penetration, as judged by skin blister fluid, of cefprozil and cefaclor were examined in 12 healthy male volunteers. Doses of 250 and 500 mg of each drug were given to fasting subjects in a crossover fashion. Serially obtained plasma, skin blister fluid, and urine samples were analyzed for cefprozil or cefaclor by validated high-pressure liquid chromatographic methods. After oral administration of 250 and 500 mg of cefprozil, mean concentrations in plasma rose to peak levels (Cmax) of 6.1 and 11.2 micrograms/ml, respectively, and those of cefaclor were 10.6 and 17.3 micrograms/ml, respectively. The elimination half-life of cefprozil (1.3 h) was significantly longer than that of cefaclor (0.6 h), and as a result, the area under the curve for cefprozil was about two times greater than that for cefaclor. Both cephalosporins were primarily excreted unchanged in urine. The mean skin blister Cmax values were 3.0 and 5.8 micrograms/ml for cefprozil and 3.6 and 6.5 micrograms/ml for cefaclor after the 250- and 500-mg oral doses, respectively. The mean Cmax values in skin blister fluid for both cephalosporins were comparable and were significantly lower than the corresponding Cmax values in plasma. However, the levels of cefprozil and cefaclor in skin blister fluid declined more slowly than they did in plasma. The skin blister fluid half-life estimates for cefprozil were significantly longer than they were for cefaclor. Parallel to the observation in plasma, the mean skin blister fluid areas under the curve for cefprozil were significantly higher than they were for cefaclor. The plasma and skin blister fluid pharmacokinetic analyses suggest that the exposure of humans to cefprozil is significantly greater than that to cefaclor at the same dose.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2393282      PMCID: PMC171785          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.34.6.1204

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  24 in total

1.  An improved method to determine interstitial fluid pharmacokinetics.

Authors:  W C Shyu; R Quintiliani; C H Nightingale
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 5.226

2.  Comparative antibacterial activity of a new oral cephalosporin, BMY-28100.

Authors:  N X Chin; H C Neu
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  In vitro activity of BMY-28100, a new oral cephalosporin.

Authors:  G M Eliopoulos; E Reiszner; C Wennersten; R C Moellering
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Suction skin blister, skin window, and skin chamber techniques to determine extravascular passage of cefotaxime in humans.

Authors:  R F Frongillo; L Galuppo; A Moretti
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Simultaneous comparison of three methods for assessing ceftazidime penetration into extravascular fluid.

Authors:  D M Ryan; B Hodges; G R Spencer; S M Harding
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Determination of cefaclor by high-performance liquid chromatography.

Authors:  M C Nahata
Journal:  J Chromatogr       Date:  1982-03-12

7.  In vitro activity and serum protein-binding of cefaclor.

Authors:  F P Tally; N V Jacobus; M Barza
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 5.790

8.  The application of statistical moment theory to the evaluation of in vivo dissolution time and absorption time.

Authors:  S Riegelman; P Collier
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1980-10

9.  Comparative pharmacokinetics of cephalexin, cefaclor, cefadroxil, and CGP 9000.

Authors:  H Lode; R Stahlmann; P Koeppe
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1979-07       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  BMY 28100, a new oral cephalosporin.

Authors:  F Leitner; T A Pursiano; R E Buck; Y H Tsai; D R Chisholm; M Misiek; J V Desiderio; R E Kessler
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 5.191

View more
  21 in total

1.  Phase I study of multiple-dose cefprozil and comparison with cefaclor.

Authors:  R H Barbhaiya; U A Shukla; C R Gleason; W C Shyu; R B Wilber; R R Martin; K A Pittman
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Comparison of cefprozil and cefaclor for treatment of acute urinary tract infections in women.

Authors:  A Iravani
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Multiple-dose pharmacokinetics of cefprozil and its impact on intestinal flora of volunteers.

Authors:  H Lode; C Müller; K Borner; C E Nord; P Koeppe
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 4.  Comparative pharmacokinetics of the new oral cephalosporins.

Authors:  H Lode; M Fassbender; T Schaberg; K Borner; P Koeppe
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 9.546

5.  Comparison of the effects of food on the pharmacokinetics of cefprozil and cefaclor.

Authors:  R H Barbhaiya; U A Shukla; C R Gleason; W C Shyu; K A Pittman
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 6.  Comparative studies of cefprozil in the management of skin and soft-tissue infections.

Authors:  T Nolen
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 7.  Cefprozil. A review of its antibacterial activity, pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic potential.

Authors:  L R Wiseman; P Benfield
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 8.  Clinical pharmacokinetics of newer cephalosporins.

Authors:  M E Klepser; M N Marangos; K B Patel; D P Nicolau; R Quintiliani; C H Nightingale
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 9.  Cefprozil: a review.

Authors:  Sumit Bhargava; Rakesh Lodha; S K Kabra
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 1.967

10.  Comparative efficacy and safety of cefprozil (BMY-28100) and cefaclor in the treatment of acute group A beta-hemolytic streptococcal pharyngitis.

Authors:  J C Christenson; E Swenson; W M Gooch; J N Herrod
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 5.191

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.