Literature DB >> 23932598

The cell biology of synaptic specificity during development.

Ryan Christensen1, Zhiyong Shao, Daniel A Colón-Ramos.   

Abstract

Proper circuit connectivity is critical for nervous system function. Connectivity derives from the interaction of two interdependent modules: synaptic specificity and synaptic assembly. Specificity involves both targeting of neurons to specific laminar regions and the formation of synapses onto defined subcellular areas. In this review, we focus discussion on recently elucidated molecular mechanisms that control synaptic specificity and link them to synapse assembly. We use these molecular pathways to underscore fundamental cell biological concepts that underpin, and help explain, the rules governing synaptic specificity.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23932598      PMCID: PMC3886710          DOI: 10.1016/j.conb.2013.07.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol        ISSN: 0959-4388            Impact factor:   6.627


  82 in total

Review 1.  Cell-cell signaling during synapse formation in the CNS.

Authors:  Peter Scheiffele
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2003-02-26       Impact factor: 12.449

Review 2.  Synaptic adhesion molecules.

Authors:  Masahito Yamagata; Joshua R Sanes; Joshua A Weiner
Journal:  Curr Opin Cell Biol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 8.382

3.  Sonic hedgehog expression in corticofugal projection neurons directs cortical microcircuit formation.

Authors:  Corey C Harwell; Philip R L Parker; Steven M Gee; Ami Okada; Susan K McConnell; Anatol C Kreitzer; Arnold R Kriegstein
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 4.  Genetics and cell biology of building specific synaptic connectivity.

Authors:  Kang Shen; Peter Scheiffele
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 12.449

5.  The immunoglobulin superfamily protein SYG-1 determines the location of specific synapses in C. elegans.

Authors:  Kang Shen; Cornelia I Bargmann
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2003-03-07       Impact factor: 41.582

6.  Sonic hedgehog signaling confers ventral telencephalic progenitors with distinct cortical interneuron fates.

Authors:  Qing Xu; Lihua Guo; Holly Moore; Ronald R Waclaw; Kenneth Campbell; Stewart A Anderson
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2010-02-11       Impact factor: 17.173

7.  Trans-synaptic Teneurin signalling in neuromuscular synapse organization and target choice.

Authors:  Timothy J Mosca; Weizhe Hong; Vardhan S Dani; Vincenzo Favaloro; Liqun Luo
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-03-18       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Teneurins instruct synaptic partner matching in an olfactory map.

Authors:  Weizhe Hong; Timothy J Mosca; Liqun Luo
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-03-18       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Multiple interactions control synaptic layer specificity in the Drosophila visual system.

Authors:  Matthew Y Pecot; Wael Tadros; Aljoscha Nern; Maya Bader; Yi Chen; S Lawrence Zipursky
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 17.173

10.  Localized netrins act as positional cues to control layer-specific targeting of photoreceptor axons in Drosophila.

Authors:  Katarina Timofeev; Willy Joly; Dafni Hadjieconomou; Iris Salecker
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2012-07-12       Impact factor: 17.173

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Specification of synaptic connectivity by cell surface interactions.

Authors:  Joris de Wit; Anirvan Ghosh
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 34.870

Review 2.  In vitro studies of neuronal networks and synaptic plasticity in invertebrates and in mammals using multielectrode arrays.

Authors:  Paolo Massobrio; Jacopo Tessadori; Michela Chiappalone; Mirella Ghirardi
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 3.599

3.  MAPK3 at the Autism-Linked Human 16p11.2 Locus Influences Precise Synaptic Target Selection at Drosophila Larval Neuromuscular Junctions.

Authors:  Sang Mee Park; Hae Ryoun Park; Ji Hye Lee
Journal:  Mol Cells       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 5.034

4.  In silico Identification and Expression of Protocadherin Gene Family in Octopus vulgaris.

Authors:  Ruth Styfhals; Eve Seuntjens; Oleg Simakov; Remo Sanges; Graziano Fiorito
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2019-01-14       Impact factor: 4.566

5.  Stereotyped terminal axon branching of leg motor neurons mediated by IgSF proteins DIP-α and Dpr10.

Authors:  Lalanti Venkatasubramanian; Zhenhao Guo; Shuwa Xu; Liming Tan; Qi Xiao; Sonal Nagarkar-Jaiswal; Richard S Mann
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 8.140

6.  Comparison of Developmental Dynamics in Human Fetal Retina and Human Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Retinal Tissue.

Authors:  Ratnesh K Singh; Paige A Winkler; Francois Binette; Simon M Petersen-Jones; Igor O Nasonkin
Journal:  Stem Cells Dev       Date:  2021-04       Impact factor: 3.272

7.  A dynamic formin-dependent deep F-actin network in axons.

Authors:  Archan Ganguly; Yong Tang; Lina Wang; Kelsey Ladt; Jonathan Loi; Bénédicte Dargent; Christophe Leterrier; Subhojit Roy
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2015-07-27       Impact factor: 10.539

8.  Presynaptic partner selection during retinal circuit reassembly varies with timing of neuronal regeneration in vivo.

Authors:  Takeshi Yoshimatsu; Florence D D'Orazi; Clare R Gamlin; Sachihiro C Suzuki; Arminda Suli; David Kimelman; David W Raible; Rachel O Wong
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  The receptor protein tyrosine phosphatase CLR-1 is required for synaptic partner recognition.

Authors:  Aruna Varshney; Kelli Benedetti; Katherine Watters; Raakhee Shankar; David Tatarakis; Doris Coto Villa; Khristina Magallanes; Venia Agenor; William Wung; Fatima Farah; Nebat Ali; Nghi Le; Jacqueline Pyle; Amber Farooqi; Zanett Kieu; Martina Bremer; Miri VanHoven
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2018-05-09       Impact factor: 5.917

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.