Literature DB >> 23932562

Outcomes of sclerotherapy and embolization for arteriovenous and venous malformations.

Jessica Bowman1, Jonathan Johnson, Michael McKusick, Peter Gloviczki, David Driscoll.   

Abstract

Vascular malformations result from an arrest of development of a normal vascular structure or from abnormal growth of a vascular structure. Treatment continues to be a challenge. We sought to study the outcomes of sclerotherapy and embolization for vascular malformations. We reviewed clinical data of all patients treated with sclerotherapy or embolization for arteriovenous or venous malformations between 2006 and 2010 at Mayo Clinic. Follow-up information was obtained from clinical charts and a questionnaire sent to all patients. Overall, 60 patients (24 male and 36 female; mean age 31.7 years; range, 5.6 to 72.4 years) had 163 unique sclerotherapy or embolization procedures for lesions involving the lower extremity (55%), upper extremity (18.3%), pelvis (11.7%), abdomen (5%), chest (5%), back (3.3%), and multiple locations (1.7%). Thirty-one patients had low-flow venous malformations and 29 patients had high-flow arteriovenous malformations. Twenty-four patients required more than three sessions. The most common indication for intervention was pain (57 of 60 [95%]). Sixteen patients (27%) had documented or patient-reported complications. There was no significant difference in complication rates or lesion size between patients with low-flow or high-flow lesions. There were no procedural deaths. Mean available follow-up was 2.0 ± 1.3 years (range, 0.5 to 5.0 years). Median pain scores at most recent follow-up decreased significantly (P<.001). Eighty-three percent of the responders (24 of 29) would recommend treatment to others. With appropriate patient selection, sclerotherapy and embolization can decrease the pain of patients with arteriovenous and venous malformations. Multiple interventions might be necessary. Practitioners should be aware of the potential complications and counsel their patients about these risks.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23932562     DOI: 10.1053/j.semvascsurg.2013.04.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0895-7967            Impact factor:   1.000


  5 in total

1.  Long-Term Outcome of Single-Session, Ultrasound-Guided, Radiofrequency Ablation for Symptomatic Small, Lower Limb, Venous Malformations.

Authors:  Laurence Verhaeghe; Veerle Labarque; Jan Vranckx; Inge Fourneau; Steven Pans; Geert Maleux
Journal:  J Belg Soc Radiol       Date:  2022-07-13       Impact factor: 1.912

2.  Treatment of Low-Flow Vascular Malformations of the Extremities Using MR-Guided High Intensity Focused Ultrasound: Preliminary Experience.

Authors:  Pejman Ghanouni; Sirish Kishore; Matthew P Lungren; Rachelle Bitton; Lauren Chan; Raffi Avedian; Alberto Bazzocchi; Kim Butts Pauly; Alessandro Napoli; David M Hovsepian
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 3.464

3.  Transarterial embolization of peripheral high-flow arteriovenous malformation with ethylene vinyl alcohol copolymer (Onyx®): single-center 10-year experience.

Authors:  Francesco Giurazza; Fabio Corvino; Gianluca Cangiano; Errico Cavaglià; Francesco Amodio; Mattia Silvestre; Giuseppe De Magistris; Raffaella Niola
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2018-10-27       Impact factor: 3.469

4.  Combined glue embolization and excision for the treatment of venous malformations.

Authors:  Rush H Chewning; Eric J Monroe; Antoinette Lindberg; Kevin S H Koo; Basavaraj V Ghodke; Kenneth W Gow; Patrick J Javid; Thomas M Jinguji; Jonathan A Perkins; Giridhar M Shivaram
Journal:  CVIR Endovasc       Date:  2018-10-25

5.  Glossectomy in the severe maxillofacial vascular malformation with jaw deformity: a rare case report.

Authors:  Min-Hyeog Park; Chul-Man Kim; Dong-Young Chung; Jun-Young Paeng
Journal:  Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2015-11-14
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.