Literature DB >> 23932541

Randomized clinical study comparing piezosurgery and conventional rotatory surgery in mandibular cyst enucleation.

Sabrina Pappalardo1, Renzo Guarnieri2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of the present study is to compare piezoelectric surgery to the conventional rotatory surgery in mandibular cyst enucleation, and to determine the 2 method's suitability and the postoperative outcomes.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Eighty patients were included in the study. 35 male and 45 female, which showed cystic mandibular lesions, compared with the inferior alveolar nerve or the mental nerve. The patients were randomly divided into two groups. In the test group, cystectomy was performed using conventional rotatory instrumentation (rotatory-group), and in the other one piezoelectric surgery (piezo-group). The swelling was documented 24/48/72 h and 1 week post-surgery and the patients recorded their subjective postoperative pain daily for 7 days using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS).
RESULTS: Patients treated with piezoelectric technique have presented a lower VAS, minor swelling and less recovery time compared to the rotatory-group. No lesions of the mandible nerve were detected with piezosurgery whereas surgery with rotary instruments resulted in 8% hypesthesia at least up to one week.
CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest that piezosurgery may be considered effective in cyst enucleation compared to traditional procedures with burs, since it grants the patients significantly less post-surgical pain and swelling.
Copyright © 2013 European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cystectomy; Piezosurgery; Rotatory surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23932541     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2013.06.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg        ISSN: 1010-5182            Impact factor:   2.078


  7 in total

1.  Comparison of the C-Reactive Protein Level and Visual Analog Scale Scores between Piezosurgery and Rotatory Osteotomy in Mandibular Impacted Third Molar Extraction.

Authors:  Lakshmi Shetty; Khushal Gangwani; Uday Londhe; Swati Bharadwaj; Mohammed Mousa H Bakri; Ahmed Alamoudi; Rodolfo Reda; Shilpa Bhandi; A Thirumal Raj; Shankargouda Patil; Luca Testarelli
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-20

2.  Successful management of spontaneous bone regeneration after jaws cystectomy using PRGF approach; case series.

Authors:  Cristian Adrian Raţiu; Ioana Adela Raţiu; Simona Cavalu; Adina Bianca Boşca; Gabriela Ciavoi
Journal:  Rom J Morphol Embryol       Date:  2020 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.033

3.  Biomechanical Stability of Dental Implants in Augmented Maxillary Sites: Results of a Randomized Clinical Study with Four Different Biomaterials and PRF and a Biological View on Guided Bone Regeneration.

Authors:  Troedhan Angelo; Wainwright Marcel; Kurrek Andreas; Schlichting Izabela
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-04-12       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Comparison of Piezosurgery and Conventional Rotary Instruments for Removal of Impacted Mandibular Third Molars: A Randomized Controlled Clinical and Radiographic Trial.

Authors:  Hani Arakji; Mohamed Shokry; Nayer Aboelsaad
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2016-08-14

5.  Virtual Surgical Planning and Piezoelectric Surgery in Tumor Extirpative Surgery Aimed at Inferior Alveolar Nerve Preservation.

Authors:  Eric L Chung; Faizan Alawi; Anh D Le; Rabie M Shanti
Journal:  Case Rep Surg       Date:  2017-12-31

6.  Comparison Between the Bone Lid Technique and the Traditional Technique in Surgical Treatment of the Posterior Mandibular Lesions: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Mohamad Husam Abu Hawa; Zaed Shehri; Issam Alkhouri
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-06-22

Review 7.  The Bone Lid Technique in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Stefano Sivolella; Giulia Brunello; Sourav Panda; Lucia Schiavon; Fouad Khoury; Massimo Del Fabbro
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 4.964

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.