Literature DB >> 23932409

The academic welfare state: making peer-review count.

Diogo Veríssimo1, David L Roberts.   

Abstract

The peer-review process is a central pillar of academic publishing. However, the work that goes into ensuring the quality of published content is rarely recognised. Here we present a correction factor for the h-index, one of the most popular metrics for quantifying academic output, that will allow for the inclusion of peer-review effort in the evaluation of the outputs produced by an academic.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23932409     DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2013.07.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol        ISSN: 0169-5347            Impact factor:   17.712


  2 in total

1.  The missing metric: quantifying contributions of reviewers.

Authors:  Maurício Cantor; Shane Gero
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2015-02-11       Impact factor: 2.963

2.  Imbalance in individual researcher's peer review activities quantified for four British Ecological Society journals, 2003-2010.

Authors:  Owen L Petchey; Jeremy W Fox; Lindsay Haddon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.