Literature DB >> 23932114

Evaluation of minimal versus conventional presurgical orthodontics in skeletal class III patients treated with two-jaw surgery.

Byungju Joh1, Mohamed Bayome, Jae Hyun Park, Je Uk Park, Yoonji Kim, Yoon-Ah Kook.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare changes in hard and soft tissues and the treatment efficacy of 2-jaw surgery combined with nonextraction treatment for skeletal Class III malocclusion in patients who received minimal presurgical orthodontics (MPO) versus those who received conventional presurgical orthodontics (CPO).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-two patients (16 in each group) with skeletal Class III malocclusion who underwent 2-jaw surgery were included in the study. Serial lateral cephalometric films were traced at 4 stages: before treatment (T0), before surgery (T1), 1 month after surgery (T2), and at debonding (T3). Cephalometric measurements and treatment duration were compared using independent t test and Mann-Whitney U test.
RESULTS: After the presurgical treatment phase, the angle between the lower incisor axis and mandibular plane, overjet, and soft tissue pogonion to the vertical reference line showed larger changes (P < 0.01) in the CPO group, whereas the pogonion to the horizontal reference line showed larger changes (P < .05) in the MPO group. In the postsurgical phase (T2 to T3), there were no significant differences between the 2 groups. Total treatment duration was significantly shorter in the MPO group.
CONCLUSIONS: There were no significant differences between the MPO and CPO groups in the hard and soft tissue cephalometric variables. The MPO group had a shorter total treatment time. It is therefore recommended that clinicians consider these results when selecting MPO as a treatment option for accurate diagnosis and treatment planning of Class III surgical patients.
Copyright © 2013 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23932114     DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2013.06.191

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0278-2391            Impact factor:   1.895


  4 in total

1.  Anchor Plate Efficiency in Postoperative Orthodontic Treatment Following Orthognathic Surgery via Minimal Presurgical Orthodontic Treatment.

Authors:  Tae-Min Jeong; Yoon-Ho Kim; Seung-Il Song
Journal:  Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2014-07-30

Review 2.  Oral Health-Related Quality of Life Changes in Patients with Dentofacial Deformities Class II and III after Orthognathic Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Valentina Duarte; Carlos Zaror; Julio Villanueva; Matías Andreo; Matías Dallaserra; Josefina Salazar; Àngels Pont; Montse Ferrer
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-02-09       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  Comparison of 3-dimensional postoperative dental movement in Class III surgical correction with and without presurgical orthodontic treatment.

Authors:  Rutapakon Insawak; Cheng-Hui Lin; Ying-An Chen; Ellen Wen-Ching Ko
Journal:  Biomed J       Date:  2020-12-25       Impact factor: 7.892

4.  Evaluation of stability after pre-orthodontic orthognathic surgery using cone-beam computed tomography: A comparison with conventional treatment.

Authors:  Hye-Rim Ann; Young-Soo Jung; Kee-Joon Lee; Hyoung-Seon Baik
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2016-09-19       Impact factor: 1.372

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.