Literature DB >> 23932061

Predicting date of birth and examining the best time to date a pregnancy.

Amina Z Khambalia1, Christine L Roberts, Martin Nguyen, Charles S Algert, Michael C Nicholl, Jonathan Morris.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the estimated date of birth (eDOB) from the last menstrual period (LMP) and ultrasound scans at varying gestations (<7(0), 7(0)-10(6), 11(0)-14(0), 14(1)-19(6), and 20(0)-27(6)weeks) with the actual date of birth (aDOB).
METHODS: In a retrospective study, data were analyzed from 18 708 women with spontaneous labor who delivered a single neonate without major anomalies in a local health district in Australia between 2007 and 2011. Data were sourced from a computerized population birth database. The study outcomes were duration of pregnancy expressed as total days, and the difference between aDOB and eDOB by dating method.
RESULTS: Only 5% of births occurred on the eDOB, regardless of the dating method or timing of the dating. Approximately 66% of births occurred within 7days of the eDOB, and there was little difference among the ultrasound examinations performed at varying gestational weeks. The ultrasound scans at 11(0)-14(0)weeks of gestation performed as well as ultrasound scans conducted at other gestational ages.
CONCLUSION: On a population basis, there were no meaningful differences in the prediction of date of birth by ultrasound scan date. An early dating scan (≤10weeks) is unnecessary if LMP is reliable.
© 2013.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gestation; Last menstrual period; Pregnancy; Risk factors; Ultrasound

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23932061     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2013.05.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet        ISSN: 0020-7292            Impact factor:   3.561


  4 in total

1.  Childhood outcomes following preterm prelabor rupture of the membranes (PPROM): a population-based record linkage cohort study.

Authors:  C L Roberts; P Wagland; S Torvaldsen; J R Bowen; J P Bentley; J M Morris
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 2.521

2.  Preterm birth and future risk of maternal cardiovascular disease - is the association independent of smoking during pregnancy?

Authors:  Anh D Ngo; Jian Sheng Chen; Gemma Figtree; Jonathan M Morris; Christine L Roberts
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2015-07-04       Impact factor: 3.007

3.  Estimated date of delivery with electronic medical records by a hybrid GBDT-GRU model.

Authors:  Yina Wu; Yichao Zhang; Xu Zou; Zhenming Yuan; Wensheng Hu; Sha Lu; Xiaoyan Sun; Yingfei Wu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-22       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Errors in estimated gestational ages reduce the likelihood of health facility deliveries: results from an observational cohort study in Zanzibar.

Authors:  Isabel Fulcher; Kaya Hedt; Stella Marealle; Jalia Tibaijuka; Omar Abdalla; Rachel Hofmann; Erica Layer; Marc Mitchell; Bethany Hedt-Gauthier
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-01-20       Impact factor: 2.655

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.